GiantsFan2012
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 153
- Reaction score
- 20
Do you guys again plan on suspending all Seinfeld episodes when the Giants come in to town this week?
perhaps the players relative to each team the healthy Giants playerds are potential game changing impact onesI get your point...And logic says that could be true...It might affect the secondary, but not the offense..
But seeing how this years team has handled it self all year long, something tells me that 2 week layoff wont be an issue..Some it is 3..
On the NFLN just now, Brian Billeck talked to Rodgers before the last game vs the Lions...
Aaron was looking forward to having some time off..To be mentally dead for a few weeks.....
Billeck thinks Rodgers will be sharp..
Also on the NFLN in same segment they bring up the G-men players that are healthy now..With no mention of the healthy guys we have back..Why??
of course you dont. if you did, you would have to accept that they can and very well may lose. those giants are coming in hot and hungry off a few big wins. i think the more you speak in absolutes and refuse to see reality, the more you set yourself up to be let down. teams no matter how good go into funks when they take breaks. it happens in all sports. get real. they might come out and have a 700 yd game, but they might come out flat. it happens.
Do you guys again plan on suspending all Seinfeld episodes when the Giants come in to town this week?
We dont own the TV station that did it..
Go ask them??
How I see it coming into this game ...
1) Packers have already beaten the Giants this year in a close game.
2) Packers have a better team this year (and I'm a Giants fan)
3) Both QBs have taken their team all the way and both have done it by going over the other team (in 2007 in the NFC championship and last year for the Pack to get to the playoffs at the end of the year).
4) Giants are catching fire at the right time (sort of like how the Packers caught fire at the end of last season and beat the Giants to get into the playoffs)
5) Giants have a better run game. While our run game has been fairly horrid this year, we've topped 100+ yards in our last 4 games.
6) Giants have a better front 4 that are all healthy and playing well right now.
7) The Giants are playing with "house" money right now. No one expected them to do anything this year and most thought a new coaching regime was going to take over next year.
8) The Packers have more weapons then the Giants can cover in the secondary.
9) Rodgers is a mobile QB who can burn you on the ground (something the Giants have a really hard time with).
10) The Pack had one whoopsie game this year (the KC game). Statistically speaking, they're due for another one.
If the Giants can keep the Packers from starting fast, in a close game they could very well walk away with a win.
If the Packers bring their A game, independent of what the Giants do, the Packers win.
That's my take on the upcoming game. Good luck everyone ... I'm really looking forward to it.
P.S. - All our condolences and wishes to the Philbin family in this tragic time.
perhaps the players relative to each team the healthy Giants playerds are potential game changing impact ones
Uh, it was a joke....lighten up, Francis.
And so was my reply.
Could have used a different name, as the one you used is actually a males name..Unless you really think my name is Francis?
not as much as 2 pro bowl defensive ends a starting outside linebacker(Boley our defensive signal caller) both Bradshaw and Jacobs healty and the 3rd wideout ManninghamI see....
A pro bowl left tackle and a right guard that was named NFL Offensive Lineman of the Year by the NFL Alumni Association and was selected as a Pro Bowl alternate…..they are not game changers?? They didnt play in the 1st game..
A LB who has led the team or came in 2nd for tackles in every year he has been in the league, and was voted team captain by his team mates for the playoffs....Is not a game changer?
Then another LB that led team in pass defending, 2nd in team tackles despite only starting 12 games last year (plus the 4 playoff games) Is not a game changer?
maybe im riding too high, but I think our defense right now may possibly be the best defense in the league with a top 7 offense vs the packers top 2 offense and one of the worst defenses. Im not sure that right now in this moment I can say that the Packers have an overall better team.
6) Giants have a better front 4 that are all healthy and playing well right now.
lol, no, that is from the move Stripes
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Haven't you heard LTF, their D-Line is unstoppable, its like a wall that goes falling down, and its not like A-Rod can do anything against it, he might be able to throw over it, or even run around in the back field. Though we can credit it can stop our seemingly optional run game.And two of those players will be blocking your healthy D -L
REmember from Chief Lying horse of the cherokee nation (whoever the hell he is)What's Tom Coughlin's record after the first half of the season?
The Giants are the same old story every year. Start out beautifully, then crash and burn. It's actually funny to watch...
Reference jokes only work when a majority of people know about the reference..
I havent seen that flick in a long time..Might have to watch it again
Except that Osi and Tuck's return to health is in direct corellation to the turn around in the defense's play.Why don't you give me a list of all tv shows, movies, and books you've read so I can make sure my next reference meets the guidelines. =]
Why are people making such a big deal out of who has more healthy guys back this time around? Neither team was without their QB, that's all that really matters. Our last meeting has no bearing on this game besides letting the Giants know they can hang with GB, and letting GB know that our best shot (so far) wasn't good enough.
IMO, the injury stuff is lame. None of us know if those injured guys would have had a great game, a rare off game, or been a non-factor.
not as much as 2 pro bowl defensive ends a starting outside linebacker(Boley our defensive signal caller) both Bradshaw and Jacobs healty and the 3rd wideout Manningham
Except that Osi and Tuck's return to health is in direct corellation to the turn around in the defense's play.
I thought Boley played 1st game? dont make me go and check..
Brad and Jac both played 1st game...
he did play 1st game back and he stated he wasn't 100 per cent and felt helplessI thought Boley played 1st game? dont make me go and check..
Brad and Jac both played 1st game...
Why don't you give me a list of all tv shows, movies, and books you've read so I can make sure my next reference meets the guidelines. =]
Why are people making such a big deal out of who has more healthy guys back this time around? Neither team was without their QB, that's all that really matters. Our last meeting has no bearing on this game besides letting the Giants know they can hang with GB, and letting GB know that our best shot (so far) wasn't good enough.
IMO, the injury stuff is lame. None of us know if those injured guys would have had a great game, a rare off game, or been a non-factor.
I am just giving ya hard time..Chilax!!
We keep hearing how your d-l are healthy and will be all over the place.....
We have our best lineman back for this game..We didnt have them for the last game..They do have an impact on how well Rodgers is protected from your d-l..
That is why I am making a big deal out of it....No one is making mention of it, it is like only your d=l being healthy is important...