Last year I was nervous about the Bears after seeing how far and well they played during the 2010 season despite GB beating them at Soldier for the NFCCG.The records are both good/great and they have some solids wins already (mn must notably). Are these teams for real?
I thought the Vikings would be 4-12 at BEST.
I don't think that you watched that game. The 49ers weren't making a ton of unforced mistakes. They got out-played, out-hussled, and out-foxed by a team that wanted it much more. You could see it in every vicious hit.Honestly I think the Vikings win over the Niners was just playing a team that wasnt on their A game...
Well I would say, just don't worry about the Vikings until the Packers have to play them. They are not much improved, the really did nothing with the DB's. That new kid Smith is going to be a bust. Ponder is just a game manager like Alex Smith. So I wouldn't worry about them for a while.
BTW, if the playoffs started tomorrow, the Vikings would be the 3rd seed.
I really think we should re-visit this question in 4 weeks. Once we see the records then we will all have a better idea. But realistically a lot of teams won't hit stride until weeks 5 or 6, GB could go on a tear, as with Detroit and flop the whole division. Personally, I think Minnesota is winning because teams aren't used to their looks and maybe not giving them enough respect. Bears have a decent team but I would be surprised if GB struggled winning this division, and not saying this with bias. If Minn/Chi keep this up in 4 weeks, maybe we should take them a little more seriously as North contenders. For now I am sticking with the Pack.