Yeah the Vikes played well enough to win against the Bears. JJM does play very well in Q4 under pressure to produce. That makes his play in the other 3 quarters baffling.I have no idea where PA got that crap about our O-line. I don't think we have had the same 5 players on the line from one game to the next so far this year. At one time, we had 4 backups and one starter playing. The O-line has been so decimated with injuries this year, I can't even tell you who will be starting tomorrow.
As for JJM. He has flashes of brilliance placed in spaces of WTF are you doing? His best playing? Down by one score with 4 minutes left in the game. Look at the second Bears game. One good drive at the beginning of the game, a bunch of crap in the middle, then he lights it up at the end. Had our Special teams not given up 56 56-yard kickoff return, we might have won that game.
I haven't seen stats, but does JJM tend to hold the ball for 3 plus seconds? If that's true it may explain his struggles, and 6/9 TD/INT ratio. And it would (should?) present a feast for the Packers' D.
Regardless, the Vikes always find a way to play well against GB. GB fans can't take anything for granted with this team. I wish they could go back to the type of play against Detroit in week 1. They played with confidence and aggressiveness. They are a sluggish team now with very little team chemistry/energy.
I hate saying those words. MLF doesn't do a good job getting his players ready mentally to play a game. That's certainly been a weakness of his. And Love's play, while very good, looks unmotivated, unenergetic. A little fire from our QB would be a welcome change.

