all about da packers said:Tramon Williams was solid after he replaced Bush.
That bogus PI call not being taken into account, Williams has shown something this year.
all about da packers said:I saw more blitzing this game.
Not that any of those who blitzed actually got to the QB, but more blitzing was nice to see.
There are 20 other pissed off threads, can't we have one that looks at the positive side? Calm down, people.
nathaniel said:There are 20 other pissed off threads, can't we have one that looks at the positive side? Calm down, people.
WTF are you talking about? That WAS positive!
When the Packers play 11 against 18, including the refs, what do you expect?
BTW, the Cowboys Cheerleaders were good looking. Positive enough?
nathaniel said:There are 20 other pissed off threads, can't we have one that looks at the positive side? Calm down, people.
WTF are you talking about? That WAS positive!
When the Packers play 11 against 18, including the refs, what do you expect?
BTW, the Cowboys Cheerleaders were good looking. Positive enough?
this isnt as bad a people think it is. if woodson was playing and kgb was in, the 2 bad calls we got. the first one wilth al harris getting that fumble, and the PI call with the legs. the pack wins this game.
all about da packers said:I saw more blitzing this game.
Not that any of those who blitzed actually got to the QB, but more blitzing was nice to see.
How is blitzing without getting home nice to see. Blitzing is an invitation to a QB to make a big play if you don't get home.
Obi1 said:nathaniel said:There are 20 other pissed off threads, can't we have one that looks at the positive side? Calm down, people.
WTF are you talking about? That WAS positive!
When the Packers play 11 against 18, including the refs, what do you expect?
BTW, the Cowboys Cheerleaders were good looking. Positive enough?
Yep, complaining about the refs is positive. I love when we lose a game and I get "WTF are you talking about" from a guy rooting for the SAME TEAM.