Post Draft/UDFA/Off-Season Signings - Each Position Trade Block

OP
OP
tynimiller

tynimiller

Cheesehead
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,395
Reaction score
6,393
...........here's a twist for everyone....really curious to @Dantés your thoughts.

So, who is the one guy that all of us included are ignoring might be the perfect trade piece?

Who has proven to be an NFL starter for likely any team in the league...
Still has some great football ahead of him....
Other teams would want......
And the Packers have reserves in place to let him walk....


Elgton Jenkins folks.

IF Green Bay and Jenkins relationship sours truly to a degree where we have another weird and complex Jaire situation I think the trade that everyone didn't see coming makes a TON of sense. Would it be betting on a few things - for sure...but that's the life in the NFL.

Sean Rhyan yes is in his final year of a deal, but he is HERE and he has center experience and was the next center up when Myers and Jenkins were out. I know for a fact the staff liked how he did at center work. You have Monk in the background or low cost type free agents with starting experience in a Sam Mustipher or a Daniel Brunskill for a one year deal also either to start or back up Rhyan.

Arguably if there is a team out there that suffers a guard go down, or has a need now, Jenkins would look EXTREMELY attractive....and we don't need another unhappy body in the building.

Now I'm still of the mindset there is a logical world where the two sides come together, ensure Jenkins somewhat that he is not on a deadend contract to be cut next year, while not mortgaging too much of the future - risking the ability to sign Tom long term. Given where Jenkins is in his career vs Tom, the team would be wise to choose Tom everyday that ends in y and roll that dice rather than the older one.
 

mradtke66

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
1,768
Reaction score
596
Location
Madison, WI
Elgton Jenkins folks.

....and we don't need another unhappy body in the building.

I think the decision is more complicated that it looks.

Presumably, the team likes Jenkins. He's a good player and letting him leave makes the team worse.

From Jenkins point of view, this is his last year. Technically he's under contract for 2026, but he has 0 guaranties left and his base salary balloons. There is approximately zero chance he plays under that deal. And he's changing positions, so if he starts slowly or has a bad game or two, it probably hurt his free agency after he's cut. Similarly, he isn't the most attractive trade piece because who ever trades for him is doing so as either a 1 year rental OR has to trade for him and then give him a new deal.

I don't know what the magic number is, but I suspect he'd be happy a 2-3 year extension that ties him to the team for those 2-3 years. The risk for the Packers is that Jenkins is starting to age out, so he might not be good for 3 more years.
 

Pkrjones

Cheesehead
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
4,359
Reaction score
2,200
Location
Northern IL
Jenkins base salaries are $11.7mil in '25, & $18.5mil in '26. Don't see anyway that he's worth $30.2mil even over the next 3 yrs, so GB extending him looks not feasible. Adding a '27 for $2mil base salary, & converting some of his '26 base salary to a bonus might be possible? It gives him some more $ now, but also ties him to GB thru '27 (for $32mil) even if his play declines or major injury.
 

gopkrs

Cheesehead
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
6,311
Reaction score
1,756
Thing is. I don't know if he is going to be a really good center.
 

gopkrs

Cheesehead
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
6,311
Reaction score
1,756
I'm reading that some people think the guard we paid (Banks) is not as good as Jenkins. I sure hope that is not the case. I think he is supposed to be a really good run blocker and an adequate pass protector. That would work for me. We paid him a lot. I hope he's good. He sure is big.
 

mradtke66

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
1,768
Reaction score
596
Location
Madison, WI
Jenkins base salaries are $11.7mil in '25, & $18.5mil in '26. Don't see anyway that he's worth $30.2mil even over the next 3 yrs, so GB extending him looks not feasible. Adding a '27 for $2mil base salary, & converting some of his '26 base salary to a bonus might be possible? It gives him some more $ now, but also ties him to GB thru '27 (for $32mil) even if his play declines or major injury.

We (likely) don't have to give him a raise. An extension that changes his 2026 cap number and ties him to the org for more years is probably all he's after. Banks is 2 years younger, but his 2026 (and 2027) cap number is roughly the same as Jenkins 2026.

Jenkins wants guaranteed money so he doesn't get cut as soon as the 2025 season ends.
 

mradtke66

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
1,768
Reaction score
596
Location
Madison, WI
I'm reading that some people think the guard we paid (Banks) is not as good as Jenkins. I sure hope that is not the case. I think he is supposed to be a really good run blocker and an adequate pass protector. That would work for me. We paid him a lot. I hope he's good. He sure is big.

This sentiment is partially why I wondered if they might slide Banks to RG, keep Jenkins at LG, and find the best center on our roster among whoever is left. You can generally hide a weaker pass protector easier at RG vs. LG, though not always.

They have since stated that it's Jenkins to center, so that idea is dead.
 

gopkrs

Cheesehead
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
6,311
Reaction score
1,756
Actually, I feel like they are doing things the right way so far. Although those 2 early picks have to be good
 
Last edited:

Dantés

Gute Loot
Joined
Jan 21, 2017
Messages
12,446
Reaction score
3,370
...........here's a twist for everyone....really curious to @Dantés your thoughts.

So, who is the one guy that all of us included are ignoring might be the perfect trade piece?

Who has proven to be an NFL starter for likely any team in the league...
Still has some great football ahead of him....
Other teams would want......
And the Packers have reserves in place to let him walk....


Elgton Jenkins folks.

IF Green Bay and Jenkins relationship sours truly to a degree where we have another weird and complex Jaire situation I think the trade that everyone didn't see coming makes a TON of sense. Would it be betting on a few things - for sure...but that's the life in the NFL.

Sean Rhyan yes is in his final year of a deal, but he is HERE and he has center experience and was the next center up when Myers and Jenkins were out. I know for a fact the staff liked how he did at center work. You have Monk in the background or low cost type free agents with starting experience in a Sam Mustipher or a Daniel Brunskill for a one year deal also either to start or back up Rhyan.

Arguably if there is a team out there that suffers a guard go down, or has a need now, Jenkins would look EXTREMELY attractive....and we don't need another unhappy body in the building.

Now I'm still of the mindset there is a logical world where the two sides come together, ensure Jenkins somewhat that he is not on a deadend contract to be cut next year, while not mortgaging too much of the future - risking the ability to sign Tom long term. Given where Jenkins is in his career vs Tom, the team would be wise to choose Tom everyday that ends in y and roll that dice rather than the older one.

I would really like to trade some guys this off-season (e.g. Doubs or another WR, Enagbare), but no one on the offensive line. The unit is too important and depth can dry up too quickly for it to be worth it, in my opinion.

Last season, the demise of the Packers could largely be attributed to poor OL depth who couldn't perform when called upon. I think the FO has made it clear that they see it the same way, given that one of their top two moves in FA was an offensive lineman and one of their top two moves in the draft was an offensive lineman.

I also doubt that Jenkins wants a raise so much as a restructure that won't make him to dispensable, cap-wise, in 2026. He's probably thinking 'I am taking a risk by changing positions, so provide me with some more security in the longer term.'
 

mradtke66

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
1,768
Reaction score
596
Location
Madison, WI
I also doubt that Jenkins wants a raise so much as a restructure that won't make him to dispensable, cap-wise, in 2026. He's probably thinking 'I am taking a risk by changing positions, so provide me with some more security in the longer term.'

This is entirely my read as well. Though he'll likely get more money as typically how this is done is more years and more guarantees.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
17,475
Reaction score
7,984
I really like Elgton just jump him a couple million and extend him 1yr.
He’s a really solid OL. We have the space to do it and he’s very versatile. There’s always a guy that goes down and just make sure he knows he’s our go to guy to move around he needs to be ready.

IMO We’re taking a top 15-20 OG across 64 OG. Probably a Top 10-15 Center or chance to be better. I’m 90% he’s better than Myers.

Give the man a PBR. Push the chips in a few extra million and show our commitment to him having a Probowl type season. Get him fired up.

If I’m trading anyone it’s Sean Rhyan. Just rewatched that 1st Eagles game. He might be part of the reason we lost. He had 2 Whiffs on the first possession. Drive killers and just about Josh Jacobs killers.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
tynimiller

tynimiller

Cheesehead
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,395
Reaction score
6,393
I would really like to trade some guys this off-season (e.g. Doubs or another WR, Enagbare), but no one on the offensive line. The unit is too important and depth can dry up too quickly for it to be worth it, in my opinion.

Last season, the demise of the Packers could largely be attributed to poor OL depth who couldn't perform when called upon. I think the FO has made it clear that they see it the same way, given that one of their top two moves in FA was an offensive lineman and one of their top two moves in the draft was an offensive lineman.

I also doubt that Jenkins wants a raise so much as a restructure that won't make him to dispensable, cap-wise, in 2026. He's probably thinking 'I am taking a risk by changing positions, so provide me with some more security in the longer term.'

I also believe this is a very strong possibility.
 

Schultz

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
3,181
Reaction score
1,834
My thoughts. Do not trade any OL this season unless the train has come completely off the tracks. Give Jenkins a small token re-structure with some incentives. Let him know if he adapts to center a more player friendly restructure will come the following offseason. Resign Tom. The decisions on Walker and Rhyan should be based not just on how well they play but more importantly on what they believe they have in Morgan and Belton. Walk and Rhy could turn into decent comp picks. IMO.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
tynimiller

tynimiller

Cheesehead
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,395
Reaction score
6,393
My thoughts. Do not trade any OL this season unless the train has come completely off the tracks. Give Jenkins a small token re-structure with some incentives. Let him know if he adapts to center a more player friendly restructure will come the following offseason. Resign Tom. The decisions on Walker and Rhyan should be based not just on how well they play but more importantly on what they believe they have in Armstrong and Belton. Walk and Rhy could turn into decent comp picks. IMO.
Armstrong?
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top