dont we have a fire Mike thread?
If this turns into that it will be merged
If this turns into that it will be merged
I agree he was interested in winning the game and not padding stats but it had nothing to do with proving the Pack was not a 1 dimensional team...and to be honest he failed, the goal of the four minute offense is not to give the football back to the opponent or at the very least give it back with hardly anytime left in not good field position...giving the ball back with 2 minutes left and 72 yards to go was not success and it is on MM and how he decided to go about accomplishing the goal smashing the ball into the line vs. 9 man fronts on 2 consecutive plays...and then throwing a 3rd and 7...thank god for the defense...sweet redemption for them...
AGREE We were supposed to play packer football, we got the lead and quit. Packers football is short passes run just enough to hit them with playaction. Today we ran great so to not see the playaction was very disappointing. If any game was perfect for play action it was todays game. Running sets up playaction. Hello MM. We can thank the D for this win the O did just enough to not lose it.
I dont think its that kind of thread call down. Im not a TT basher. so far no harm has been done.dont we have a fire Mike thread?
If this turns into that it will be merged
I think you beat me to it.dont we have a fire Mike thread?
If this turns into that it will be merged
hmm it got merged so there should only be TWO threads on this entire forum they can be titled "SUCK MM OFF" AND "MM SUCKS MASSIVE ****"
I merged it, apparently. Thought it was LTF...hmm it got merged so there should only be TWO threads on this entire forum they can be titled "SUCK MM OFF" AND "MM SUCKS MASSIVE ****"
well I changed mine too so.. there you go.. not like suck its was any better lolI had a bad sentence to go along with you calling me a p***y
but let it slide