PackAttack12
R-E-L-A-X
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2016
- Messages
- 6,499
- Reaction score
- 2,157
If you always do what you have always done, then you will always get what you have always got.
I could not agree more! along with TT we need to also dump MM. Five years from now it will be the mid 80's all over again and MM will be recognized as the man who made it happen.While the reigning Super Bowl champions are already making moves to improve the team, do nothing Teddy is standing pat, overpaying his own players, and releasing the second best player for the Packers over the past eight years. ******* Thompson is ******* worthless, releasing Cutler has just cost us two wins a year and now we're going to have to compete with three teams for an NFC North title instead of the usual two. How people can keep defending this ******* worthless piece of ******* **** I will never know but I've had it with this ******* ********.
People gave Raji a hard time but he was better than Mike Daniels in every phase of the game.
Absolutely disagree with this statement.
sorry, not Mike McCarthy But Mark Murphy that i was refering to. i should have clarified thatAbsolutely disagree with this statement.
Despising Ted Thompson should in no way be regarded as panic.Relax, there is still ample time for the Packers to finalize next year's roster. There's no reason to panic as of right now.
sorry, not Mike McCarthy But Mark Murphy that i was refering to. i should have clarified that
He even screwed that up!How can you say he has done nothing?!?!?!?!? He picked out the lovely new blue color for the visitors locker room........
I don't believe that. I would say that Belicheck is a better coach than McCarthy. Ask yourself, why do stars from the Patriots get signed as FAs and then appear average? How can NE plug anyone in, and seem to not miss a beat? Its coaching - not talent.
I'm convinced that Rodell hacked into Ogsponge's account to make the initial post. While Ogsponge has been backing away while pointing out it was satire, there is someone carrying that torch....
Which is probably why most of us initially figured it was a serious post.
Every year about this time, we hear that the team is going backwards while the others move forward. It's a sorry and lame record to hear repeatedly, especially when it proves out to be false every year.
Every team has major weaknesses. We aren't the only one. We fixed safety. They are on their way to solidifying ILB, and now it's CB. Not even the Patriots walked into this offseason without weaknesses that need to be fixed.Does it? I'm not so sure. We seem to be the team every year with the elite QB and a major predictible weakness on D that we can't cover up. One year it was safety, then ILB, then corner. We are a team that can make the Super Bowl but need just about every possible circumstance to go right for that to happen and need to stay very healthy.
I'd say we've been that team for at least 5 seasons. I'm not saying we're moving backwards, but we don't appear to be moving forward either.
For the record I am not backing away from anything I 100% standby the satirical nature of my post. I mean come on, the majority of my rant was about Ted Thompson releasing the second best player for the Packers (Jay Cutler) Who was a Chicago bear. Here is the definition of satire:I'm convinced that Rodell hacked into Ogsponge's account to make the initial post. While Ogsponge has been backing away while pointing out it was satire, there is someone carrying that torch....
Which is probably why most of us initially figured it was a serious post.
Every year about this time, we hear that the team is going backwards while the others move forward. It's a sorry and lame record to hear repeatedly, especially when it proves out to be false every year.
Every team has major weaknesses. We aren't the only one. We fixed safety. They are on their way to solidifying ILB, and now it's CB. Not even the Patriots walked into this offseason without weaknesses that need to be fixed.
TT has bested just about every organization out there except for NE. Everyone used to point to San Francisco. Then Seattle was the gold standard, but their foundation is cracking. New Orleans has fallen far with their elite QB. The Ravens haven't competed in a while. Denver fell apart after going all-in. Arizona couldn't stay near the top very long and Carolina took big steps back. You can quibble about the list, but mainly there are three teams that have been consistently good for a long time - Green Bay, New England, and Pittsburgh. Perspective is important. Seattle came later and is fizzling sooner as a potential fourth team.
Yes it's frustrating to not be as good as NE but what we've done is impressive, how TT has done it has been impressive, and not one of us could likely do it better. I'm not complacent but I am very happy with being in this elite group. It shows owners and GMs that think about the long term and make moves -- or don't make moves -- with the future in mind.
I guess that I look forward to hearing the same gripes out of you guys in a few more years. That would mean that we're still at the top and still have a chance. Hopefully we'll win one of them along the way.
You can quibble about the list, but mainly there are three teams that have been consistently good for a long time - Green Bay, New England, and Pittsburgh. Perspective is important. Seattle came later and is fizzling sooner as a potential fourth team.
Cornflower Blue, to be precise.How can you say he has done nothing?!?!?!?!? He picked out the lovely new blue color for the visitors locker room........
Sort of the same way it happens for everyone else too. Don't think the Pats got lucky this season playing the Texans after they had no competent QB? Or that the Texans only got there after beating the Raiders after they lost their QB?We are a team that can make the Super Bowl but need just about every possible circumstance to go right for that to happen and need to stay very healthy.
Sort of the same way it happens for everyone else too. Don't think the Pats got lucky this season playing the Texans after they had no competent QB? Or that the Texans only got there after beating the Raiders after they lost their QB?
Most teams have a bit of luck in who they play and how healthy they are at the time. Health to significant cogs probably counts the most. Wouldn't the Packers have been better over the years with a 10 year starter Nick Collins, 8 year starter Jermichael Finley, 4 year starter Eddie Lacey, not counting the never-weres that really did not get a chance due to injuries? Happens to all teams. Some can overcome them when it happens, most can't.The Pats just got lucky, seriously? What about the other 6 Super Bowls they were in in the BB era?