packerfan1245
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2006
- Messages
- 721
- Reaction score
- 0
From Chris Mortensen ESPN. He thought it was just the right thing to do
I know.....thats what i mean......the odds are getting scary.lol he won't
how many games has he missed?
Hopefully this will bridge the gap all the crap thats been going on has caused. Maybe Favre will like the new kids, and get excited about being here again...............I hope.this is really good news for our offense,
it will help our rookies on offense get better faster because now they can create a good chemistry with Favre early. That goes for everyone, but especially for the rookies, I'm thinking of Brandon Jackson and James Jones in particular.
If you call those that called Brett out for planning to skip camp the Brett Haters, then I can say that I say this is what I wanted all along and that I was right about Favre having time to attend.
what do the Brett haters got to say about this?
Raider Pride said:what do the Brett haters got to say about this?
I am not a Brett Hater. Anyone who has been on this forum for any length of time knows that. Anyone who was from the old NC forum knows that.
bozz_2006 said:WATCH IT BUD, I'M NO BRETT HATER! AND I'M NOT GAY EITHER, SO JUST LEAVE IT ALONE, ALRIGHT!!!!
Raider Pride said:Zero2Cool said:what do the Brett haters got to say about this?
I am not a Brett Hater. Anyone who has been on this forum for any length of time knows that. Anyone who was from the old NC forum knows that.
I don't quite understand the defensive approach by a few people here. I didn't even specify any one person. If you're not a Brett hater, you don't need to claim your innocence to it.
Raider Pride said:Raider Pride said:Zero2Cool said:what do the Brett haters got to say about this?
I am not a Brett Hater. Anyone who has been on this forum for any length of time knows that. Anyone who was from the old NC forum knows that.
I don't quite understand the defensive approach by a few people here. I didn't even specify any one person. If you're not a Brett hater, you don't need to claim your innocence to it.
Zero,
I understand how you feel, I have felt that way myself. However, one day I looked at the NUMBER OF READS per post compared to the NUMBER OF RESPONSES per post and I found that there are hundreds of people who read but do not post and many, many of those people are new readers.
The bottom line is there is a ton of people who read here but are not the regulars. It is not a defensive approach if one thinks outside the box.
R.P.
Raider Pride said:Raider Pride said:Zero2Cool said:what do the Brett haters got to say about this?
I am not a Brett Hater. Anyone who has been on this forum for any length of time knows that. Anyone who was from the old NC forum knows that.
I don't quite understand the defensive approach by a few people here. I didn't even specify any one person. If you're not a Brett hater, you don't need to claim your innocence to it.
Zero,
I understand how you feel, I have felt that way myself. However, one day I looked at the NUMBER OF READS per post compared to the NUMBER OF RESPONSES per post and I found that there are hundreds of people who read but do not post and many, many of those people are new readers.
The bottom line is there is a ton of people who read here but are not the regulars. It is not a defensive approach if one thinks outside the box.
R.P.
Raider Pride said:Zero2Cool said:Raider Pride said:Zero2Cool said:what do the Brett haters got to say about this?
I am not a Brett Hater. Anyone who has been on this forum for any length of time knows that. Anyone who was from the old NC forum knows that.
I don't quite understand the defensive approach by a few people here. I didn't even specify any one person. If you're not a Brett hater, you don't need to claim your innocence to it.
Zero,
I understand how you feel, I have felt that way myself. However, one day I looked at the NUMBER OF READS per post compared to the NUMBER OF RESPONSES per post and I found that there are hundreds of people who read but do not post and many, many of those people are new readers.
The bottom line is there is a ton of people who read here but are not the regulars. It is not a defensive approach if one thinks outside the box.
R.P.
Do you know why they read and not post? I'm sure you do and I'm sure you can understand how and why its one of the reasons I started my own little Packers page.
Not many people like negative nancies.
Raider Pride said:Zero2Cool said:Raider Pride said:Zero2Cool said:what do the Brett haters got to say about this?
I am not a Brett Hater. Anyone who has been on this forum for any length of time knows that. Anyone who was from the old NC forum knows that.
I don't quite understand the defensive approach by a few people here. I didn't even specify any one person. If you're not a Brett hater, you don't need to claim your innocence to it.
Zero,
I understand how you feel, I have felt that way myself. However, one day I looked at the NUMBER OF READS per post compared to the NUMBER OF RESPONSES per post and I found that there are hundreds of people who read but do not post and many, many of those people are new readers.
The bottom line is there is a ton of people who read here but are not the regulars. It is not a defensive approach if one thinks outside the box.
R.P.
I like box
bozz_2006 said:that's not what you told me in your last PM.