Bus Cook
You're never alone with a schizophrenic
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2013
- Messages
- 464
- Reaction score
- 29
0 superbowls, 0 MVPs. How did Favre do without MM? 2 superbowls, 3 MVPs.How did brett do with MM?
0 superbowls, 0 MVPs. How did Favre do without MM? 2 superbowls, 3 MVPs.How did brett do with MM?
He had one of his best seasons as a qb..sherman polluted him and it took MM to fix his ways0 superbowls, 0 MVPs. How did Favre do without MM? 2 superbowls, 3 MVPs.
That Harrell was the best we could do in the developmental role began as a mystery and ended as a bad habit. At least Coleman had size and arm strength, good starting points, but alas not the head for it. Harrell never had the physical tools.I get it. You were one of the few people that actually knew, before everyone else, that Harrell was incapable of backing up Rodgers.
I was just answering your question. I do assume that "one of his best seasons as a QB" may have been during the three year consecutive MVP years, without MM, but thats one mans opinionHe had one of his best seasons as a qb..sherman polluted him and it took MM to fix his ways
I was just answering your question. I do assume that "one of his best seasons as a QB" may have been during the three year consecutive MVP years, without MM, but thats one mans opinion
0 superbowls, 0 MVPs. How did Favre do without MM? 2 superbowls, 3 MVPs.
So his QB rating had to do with MM but his Ints were all his fault. Very selective. I love TT.MM could have went to two SB with 2 different q/bs...But someone blew a pass in overtime...
That must tick people off, eh?
So the fact that I attribute greatness (not just with Favre) to the players who exhibit greatness and not their coaches is trollish? Got it.Under Holmgren 2 of his mvp years he had 99.5 in 1995 and 95.8 in 1996
2007 rate of 95.7 28 td 15 int this is ranked as 3rd best while in Green Bay.....One of the best can be considered top 3, correct?
The last 10 years with the Pack his lowest int total was 15...Once in 2001 and the other time in 2007..
But the point is MM can get q/b to play better....
Not sure why you insist on being trollish...
But those are the facts
So his QB rating had to do with MM but his Ints were all his fault. Very selective. I love TT.
So the fact that I attribute greatness (not just with Favre) to the players who exhibit greatness and not their coaches is trollish? Got it.
"Stubborn"? "Idiotic"? Why wouldn't they want to do what they feel is best for the Packers team? Their pride? I am guessing that they would rather have their performance bonuses by winning more games than holding out (by not picking up another QB) because they don't want to swallow their pride. Don't be such drama queens. You guys kind of sound like Vikings fans. The Pack will be just fine.
0 superbowls, 0 MVPs. How did Favre do without MM? 2 superbowls, 3 MVPs.
add in prep with qb guru MM wallace never had a coach like him
As I recall, Holmgren (Wallace's coach for the Seahawks) was generally noted as an excellent quarterback coach. Now, he didn't develop any Matt Flynns but Holmgren did develop a few journeymen QBs like Steve Young, Brett Favre and Matt Hasslebeck.
Sorry bro, I cant EVER recall anyone screaming to go get young or wallace.....
I don’t know about troll, but you’re definitely a Favre fan doing a **** poor imitation of a Packers fan.So the fact that I attribute greatness (not just with Favre) to the players who exhibit greatness and not their coaches is trollish? Got it.
3 years and started 12 games in Seattle...
Most starts were in 08... 11 tds and 3 int and out performed Matt Hasselbeck that year (Holmgrens last year coaching there)
He then went to Cleveland in 2010 Holmgren brought him there..So Holmgren MUST have liked him for a reason?