ram29jackson
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2008
- Messages
- 316
- Reaction score
- 21
Thats @robdog areaBut, HEY MODS, can we add another little icon thingy at the bottom that looks like a panic button? That way we could just signify a post seemed like it was mashing the panic button without going to the effort of making a reply.
Huh
Ok, I understand folks getting anxious about an injury to Rodgers. Heck, every time he runs the ball, I hold my breath. He's the face of the franchise and all that. But injuries happen. That is why every team has a bench. It's next man up and the team will just have to coach up Wallace enough to get through this spell without the normal Commander of the offense.
But, HEY MODS, can we add another little icon thingy at the bottom that looks like a panic button? That way we could just signify a post seemed like it was mashing the panic button without going to the effort of making a reply.
read bottom of picture
It's not panic to think a 33 year old QB won't suddenly improve in a week. He completed 2 percent fewer passes than his career average and was 0.1 yards lower than his career yards/attempt average. What exactly is he going to improve in six days that he hasn't been able to in the previous eight YEARS?
Lol... You really expect Files to do that again? No way. Not with Lacy and Starks eating up the clock.No way man.... now that the eagles have Nick Foles back and he tossed 7 TD's in his return game and threw for 400+ yards.....We are in trouble.
Packers to sign Flynn if he proves he's healthyThey had their chance with Flynn when he was released from the Raiders but stuck with Wallace..
He will have a week of practice reps now, vs Philly should be better game for him...
If he doesnt play better then, then I expect them to get someone else
Packers to sign Flynn if he proves he's healthy
Packers to sign Flynn if he proves he's healthy
ESPN’s Ed Werder expects the Packers to sign free agent Matt Flynn “if convinced he’s healthy.” This came from a tweet that Werder wroter earlier today.
the Packers' decision not to put in a claim for Flynn is a good indication they have no plans to bring him back at this time.
Theres a difference between being realistic and just having Packer blinders on...i'm realistic with a bit of optimism. If Rodgers is out for a significant amount of time? With the qb situation we have now? we'd be lucky to win another game the rest of the season. I don't care what you TT lovers say but 80% of the blame goes to him, Rodgers hasn't had an adequate backup since Flynn left and that is a FACT.
Vince Young came in and did a solid job but then they cut the dam guy? not only that they cut the guy's they ended up keeping over Young. I knew thiswould happen sooner or later and now we have gone from the best qb situation to the worse qb situation in the league without Rodgers. If we kept Young he could've been up to speed with the playbook and actually gave us a chance to win last night. This is unreal smh.
If he's going to go that route, I would rather have Tebow, at least he could run the read-option with Lacy.
Lol... You really expect Files to do that again? No way. Not with Lacy and Starks eating up the clock.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
What is it with some posters on here ??? "TT is the greatest thing since sliced bread !", as soon as there is an unforseen injury, BAM !!! " TT should be run out of town, he has screwed this team (no pun intended)". Then we get "The defense were brilliant, every player stepping up to the plate", and next its "The defense need a rocket up the ***, and are killing us every week !".
We`ve just got to work with the hand we have been dealt here, and stop *****ing about how the world has got it in for us