ThinkICare
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2009
- Messages
- 711
- Reaction score
- 15
So, you don't think Carr would've been better with a "good enough" O-Line?
So you figure it out by yourself what this so called EXPERTS know about anything...
How is he after 2 years with the Giants, with arguably a very good OL?????????So, you don't think Carr would've been better with a "good enough" O-Line?
That is what I thought.!!!!!:hunter:First of all........I do figure it out myself........and when we picked Harrell, I was looking at the guys still there at that position, and was like........what the hell are the Packers thinking. I am not saying I am always right, Kiper is always right........or whoever. I was just making the statement that I thought their were guys left on the board........that most people had way above Harrell. As far as the experts are concerned...........ha...ha...ha....look at the draft back when Tony Mandrich was picked before......Barry Sanders.........Dieon Sanders just to name a couple.
But this post is about Dexter McCluster. I think adding Dexter McCluster would be like........well check out the pick....
How is he after 2 years with the Giants, with arguably a very good OL?????????
Yeah, it is a good gauge, for a FIRST OVERALL. He doesn't get any consideration from teams desperate to get QBs.Well, one could argue he got really shook up after those years with the Texans. Being one of the most sacked QB's in that span of time where he was with the Texans. The fact that he had 4 different Offensive Coordinators with the Texans didn't help at all either. Am I suppose to believe Carr is suppose to thrive after what he went through with the Texans, that he'll automatically be the QB he was suppose to be with the Texans and go from there? Last time I checked, Eli Manning was the starting QB for the Giants, so I don't know where you're going with that argument. Like watching a few halves of preseason games is a good gauge on how he would've actually performed with the Giants as a starter.
He sits on the bench.......how will anyone know???????How is he after 2 years with the Giants, with arguably a very good OL?????????
FOOTBALL OUTSIDERS: Innovative Statistics, Intelligent Analysis | Bruce Campbell Runs A 4.77 40-Yard DashAndre, Kitchener, ON, Canada
4:08 PM ET
Gil, Favorite combine drill? Least favorite/meaningful in your opinion?
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Gil Brandt, NFL.com
Andre, every drill is done for a reason. I think what interests me the most is what interests most everyone the most: the 40-yard dash. It answers the most questions for me. The one that maybe answers the least questions for me is the broad jump.
Year Player 40 Time 2007 Allen Barbre 4.84 2009 Lydon Murtha 4.88 2005 Khalif Barnes 4.92 2007 Joe Thomas 4.92 2006 Eric Winston 4.94 2007 Jermon Bushrod 4.95 2006 Guy Whimper 4.96 2004 Adrian Jones 4.97 2004 Robert Gallery 4.98 2003 Jon Stinchcomb 4.99 2008 Jeremy Zuttah 4.99
BECAUSE THIS WASN'T ABOUT CARR! YOU MADE IT OUT TO BE!Sanchez looked pretty good down the stretch with that great OL, but they're much more a running team. Stafford looked terrible with one memorable game against a bad team. Where are you going with this?
Putting the blame on just the QB is really easy also. You've been doing it through this whole argument. Throwing out words people are sorta familiar with, trying to knock a QB for getting picked 1st overall when he had no control over it. I'm not saying he was totally worth the pick, but saying he was a complete bust and putting all the blame on him is lame to me.
Why do you bring up Kiper's and Casserly's names? What does that have to do with Carr's abilities?
Every EXPERT had CM3 as an early 2nd round pick...
TT had CM3 as #15...
Mike Mayock has Earl Thomas ahead Eric Berry.
Todd McShay (A.k.a. tanned man) doesn't have Clausen as a 1st rounder, because "he's not sure what's his upside". Are you kidding me? He's had monstruous sucess in a pro offense, in a bad team, and you don't rank him at the 1st round because you're "not sure about his upside"?
And about Kiper, here's a little nugget:
So you figure it out by yourself what this so called EXPERTS know about anything...
I've been saying that those 4 years with the Texans screwed with Carr's head and now is not a good QB anymore. I think he was a good QB. You guys obviously don't.
BTW RS, how do you know if Harrell wasn't a reach on TT's board? Do you know something we don't?
Not in TT's board. But I don't have the info as to where he was in his board...
He made plenty of bad choices. If you felt like I was idolizing him, I feel offended.I don't really want to argue anymore, but you just contradicted yourself. How do you know every single other player he drafted wasn't a reach on his board? Just don't make TT up to be the GM of all GM's. I think he's a good GM and I'm happy we have him in the Packers organization. It's not impossible that at some times he might have been impulsive at certain times in drafts.
Yeah, and again, I used the never term as an hyperbole...All I was saying is that saying he's NEVER EVER once reached or been impulsive is an exaggeration. I'm aware of TT's intelligence. He's definitely a smart GM.