Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

woodson broken collar bone

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by longtimefan, Oct 22, 2012.

  1. Forget Favre Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 27, 2009
    Message Count:
    5,727
    Ratings Received:
    +1,498 / 6
    Looking at your Avatar.:
    I wonder if Woodson is covered by State Farm?
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. faithality Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Message Count:
    11
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 1
    Packer Fan Since:
    2008
    This is an opportunity for our secondary to grow, and see what our secondary post-woodson will look like.
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  3. 98Redbird Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Message Count:
    668
    Location:
    Bears Country... UGH!!
    Ratings Received:
    +143 / 5
    Whatever.... This is how we roll.
  4. mradtke66 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Message Count:
    296
    Location:
    Madison, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +72 / 6
    Agreed. My post from last week talking about the future...well, the future came sooner than I thought. This might actually end Woodson's career in GB. 6 weeks minimum. What if his replacements play balls to the wall?
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Jordyruns Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Message Count:
    282
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    Ratings Received:
    +82 / 4
    Packer Fan Since:
    1997
    From what I have seen of Mcmillian so far I trust him to step up and replace Woodson. We need Raji back this week now
    • Agree Agree x 3
  6. Bensalama21 Ben

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,310
    Location:
    Charlotte
    Ratings Received:
    +469 / 10
    Now there isn't a controversy on who starts between Heyward and Shields! Problem solved :)
  7. 13 Times Champs Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,911
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings Received:
    +838 / 44
    Packer Fan Since:
    1960
    Both Heyward and Shields are corners
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. Brandon Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Message Count:
    114
    Ratings Received:
    +31 / 21
    Packer Fan Since:
    1995
    This is certainly terrible news. Definitely a blow, but is it really going to change the entire dynamic of the defense? I don't think so. As a prior poster pointed out it's going to be his football knowledge we miss most, not necessarily his diminishing skill sets. Woodson has lost a step and there's no doubt about it, and his fragility is an age factor. He is also a land mine when it comes to penalties with his aggressive play style, so him off the field might save some penalty yardage.

    Anyone who replaces him will likely be a better skilled player, but the lack of awareness and intuition will have to be monitored closely--routes he might naturally jump at will likely not be pursued by his younger replacement.
    • Informative Informative x 1
  9. Southpaw Endorphin Junkie

    Member Since:
    Sep 8, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,053
    Location:
    PA
    Ratings Received:
    +356 / 19
    Oh HAI guise don't worry. Remember 2010?

    We can totally go all the way without one of our best players. It's not like we're having trouble covering receivers or anything.



    :cautious:
  10. HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Message Count:
    1,381
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Ratings Received:
    +603 / 16
    Packer Fan Since:
    1959
    Jeez, how many times do we have to say, "next man up"? The good news is the youngster in the D-backfield are playing very well.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,919
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,779 / 50
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Hype Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 12, 2011
    Message Count:
    123
    Location:
    Jersey Shore
    Ratings Received:
    +35 / 2
    C-Wood has always been one of my atheletes of all time. His presence on the field will be missed but he will be there to get the locker ready to play...



    I have faith in our new cast of characters in the secondary.....
  12. IluvGB Killer Queen Cheese!

    Member Since:
    Aug 7, 2006
    Message Count:
    4,006
    Ratings Received:
    +649 / 2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1919
    omgoodness.... couldn't read any more after seeing this!!!!

    :roflmao:

    Charles-cinderella-slipper-woodson!!!!
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,919
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,779 / 50
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    My wife reminded me that yesterday I mentioned why was Rodgers with their last series...

    Then I said same thing when they showed Clay going in on defense. No need for them to be in at all..Now we are down a guy
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,919
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,779 / 50
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975

    If we can not beat the Jags at home with MJD out and either Blaine Gabbert or Chad Henne at q/b..... then we dont deserve to go to the playoffs...

    Same with the Cards..Their defense is not to bad..But they have no real good q/b..They are down to their 3rd or 4th string rb...no real te either

    Colts at least had half way decent q/b and good wr's
  13. milani Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 11, 2012
    Message Count:
    235
    Ratings Received:
    +49 / 8
    Packer Fan Since:
    1959
    You wonder why Woodson had to be on the field with less than 3 minutes to play and we are up by 14. But it could have happened at any time. You can probably pencil in losses to Detroit, NY, and maybe even Minnesota in that 3 game stretch unless ARod can put up 35 points or so. I can see Manning sending Victor Cruz long every play and Stafford doing the same for Megatron. Against the Vikings we will stack the box to slow up Peterson and it will put our safeties in single coverage long as well.
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  14. BrettsFavor Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 10, 2012
    Message Count:
    46
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 2
    Guys, we're fine.
  15. FrankRizzo Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2010
    Message Count:
    4,235
    Location:
    Dallas
    Ratings Received:
    +994 / 22
    #1- "Woodson made of glass"..... he's been very durable for us, but they say once you break that collar bone, it's easier to break it again. We're lucky he lasted all of last year then. Remember, he was always injured in Oakland, but for us, he's been REMARKABLY durable, luckily.

    #2- The timing of this could not be any better.
    As long as it's 6 weeks or close to it. Next 3 weeks: vs crappy Jags. vs crappy (now) Cardinals. bye.
    Yes the 3 weeks after that are tough & important: at Detroit, at NYG, vs Minny.
    Then it's the Lions and Bears after that.

    It's good we have 2 guys at safety in MD Jennings and Jeron McMillian, who have been playing plenty back there at safety. I really wish we had Collins though dammit. What bad luck.

    I want to know who's the next safety after those 3... in case Morgan Burnett gets hurt. Knowing our luck, we can't be surprised if that happens. And don't blame me if it happens ;)
  16. Trapped In Vikingville Trapped

    Member Since:
    Oct 6, 2010
    Message Count:
    213
    Location:
    Hudson WI. / Mason WI.
    Ratings Received:
    +80 / 1
    Charles may be sidelined but he still has something to add standing on the sidelines. These boy's look up to him. He will be motivating, just not on the field.
  17. SpartaChris Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,941
    Ratings Received:
    +862 / 26
    I was gonna paste that link for anyone panicking over Woodson not being in the lineup for the next few weeks. We're better with him than without, but I don't believe it's going to be all that noticeable.

    Also- Adam Schefter said he broke his other collarbone, not the same one he broke in the Super Bowl. He also said it's not believed to be overly serious.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,919
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,779 / 50
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    He said maybe a month? Least I thought that is what I heard on MNF just now
  18. LZ13 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 13, 2012
    Message Count:
    209
    Ratings Received:
    +89 / 7
    Packer Fan Since:
    1958
    Time for others to step up. Woodson was always my favorite on defense, but age has started to catch up a little bit. No doubt it was Woodson that helped the team in a big way turn the corner in 2010 and win it all.
  19. BorderRivals.com Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 12, 2012
    Message Count:
    342
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Ratings Received:
    +225 / 12
    It's not doom and gloom with him out of the lineup. The bottom line is Woodson is not the same player we've been accustomed to over these past seven years. He has 1 pick, 1 FF (not recovered b/c we somehow, inexplicably, have yet to recover a fumble), and 1.5 sacks. Even still, he hasn't passed the eye test much during the games. He's been called for more holdings and pass intereferences than ever before. I think much of that has to do with his slowing down game.

    With the quartet of Tramon, Shields, Hayward, and House, I don't think the Packers could be in better position to weather the next six weeks. Frankly, it's fitting Hayward will get Woody's playing time given Haywards playmaking ways so far. And McMillian and Jennings have already gotten plenty of experience manning the safety spot in sub-packages. See here for more on the fill-ins: http://wp.me/p29VCs-ca

    The biggest unknown will be how his loss will affect pre-snap alignment. It will be incumbent upon Tramon, Burnett, and probably even Hawk to make sure the pre-snap adjustments are made. And as others have stated, Woodson should still be on the sideline coaching up the youngsters during games.

    It sucks we'll be without Woodson. But, I'm not overly worried... yet. Just cautiously optimistic in my belief the youngsters are ready.
  20. buggybill2003 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 22, 2012
    Message Count:
    530
    Location:
    Birmingham, England
    Ratings Received:
    +180 / 7
    Packer Fan Since:
    2004
    In England we used to have a comedy programme called Dad`s Army, in which one characters catchphrase was "We`re doomed, we`re all doomed". Jeez it is true......"We`re doomed !" without Woodson we are well and truly shafted !!!!
  21. buggybill2003 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 22, 2012
    Message Count:
    530
    Location:
    Birmingham, England
    Ratings Received:
    +180 / 7
    Packer Fan Since:
    2004
    I totally agree that Woodson isn`t quite the athlete he used to be, but he is the heart and brain of the defense. This is one hell of a blow....IMO

Share This Page