With those petulant children, you can never tell! Okay, maybe petulant child is overboard on my part. The message is that emotion is a driving factor in Rodgers behaviors and play. The fact is, the offense looked a lot different last season than the previous two. Another reason could be that Adams was a big component of Rodgers success. Without his presence, the AR or the Packers altered their strategy.
Nope, but I'm admittedly biased because I still think he's maybe the best QB I've ever seen in the Big 10.
I'm most concerned with receivers dropping passes and fumbles. I think that is maybe our greatest offensive vulnerability along with holding penalties out of this inexperienced group of WR's and TE's. I can envision drives being derailed by these types of things.
The party venues just look different in Miami, Atlanta and Green Bay. Inebriation resources are never more than 2 minutes away in Green Bay or virtually any place in Wisconsin where 10,000 people live.Nobody predicted Rodgers would have 2 back to back MVP’s including yourself. That has been the argument you’ve promoted all along.
But thank you Nostradamus!
?? I don’t know why you keep saying this?? It’s so obvious that the odds aren’t in favor of finding a FRANCHISE anything outside of 10 overall. I’m not even sure it guarantees you a HOF Kicker (see Charlie Gogolak). Does that mean we should be scaredy cats and not draft a QB past 10 overall? I don’t know about you but the last thing I want? is an ultra timid GM
But yeah point taken that night life party life in 1992 Green Bay just rivaled Miami and Atlanta! There was a better party life in little old lacrosse WI around that timeframe. Although we had like 100 Bars on 1 street so theres that
PS. I think Some guys I know did flip some cop cars over at City Hall because the cops tried to shut the Bars on 3rd street down early. Don’t mess with the best cause the best don’t mess!
It was all Hearsay though!
My memory is that Favre focused on Sharpe 100%. If a pass went elsewhere, it was the 4th read in the progression because Sharp was the first 3 options. That much focus on Sharpe wasn't good and the offense would have been more effective if the ball was spread around more.
Oh for sure. I know it all too well as I grew up a few miles from a major brewery and I have relatives going back at least 4 generations that made Peerless and eventually G Heilemen.
Links?????
First hand knowledge?
Agree.
Exactly what did it cost the Packers? Another Justin Harrell, Derek Sharrod, Nick Perry, Datone Jones, Ha Ha Clinton Dix, Damarious Randall, Kevin King, Darnell Savage, Eric Stokes, Devonte Wyatt? Or would they have ended up with an above average player like Clay Matthews, Brian Bulaga or Kenny Clark?
I was just going to say that Love mentioned he was being more aggressive than he might be in a critical game scenario. I believe he used the term “testing his limits”
Oh I see. I agree the odds are definitely lower. Some teams go through an entire Platoon of QB’s once they get outside that top 10. Some teams even go through some top 10 overall drafted QBs without them sticking long term.
Amen. It’s pretty rare to get that CM3 type long term impact later Day1 or beyond. Even more rare at QB because it’s generally picked over by #26 overall area.
I’ll never forget that year he threw more INT than TD’s. Obviously those first couple seasons are shaky for many QBs
You guys nailed it. Darn. Hopefully somehow, Watson, Musgrave, Reed, Kraft and Doubs somehow make some sort of impact considering where they were drafted.
Not sure why Stokes and Wyatt made the list. Stokes was very impressive his first year and the 2nd started slowly then he got injured. Wyatt looked very impressive in limited snaps. I am more impressed with his rookie year than Clark's. Took Clark about 3 years to really show he was going to be special.
Great list. Who would the anti-Love pick crowd (formerly known as the anti-Rodgers pick crowd back in the Favre days) rather have than Love? Trade up for Trey Lance? Take Will Levis and play a rookie this season? And don't say Brock Purdy, nobody saw that coming.
I included both, since most of the "shouldn't have picked Love folks", insist that any other player selected would have contributed a lot more than Love. Stokes is a mixed bag. Yeah, good rookie year, but second year, not so much. Wyatt will hopefully develop, but his contributions as a rookie, not much.
I've never met you, Aaron Rodgers, Gute, MLF or any posters in this forum, but I have read/listened to, a lot of what these people have said. So tell me, how does "meeting them" change what they say and how I interpret it? Body language? Messages on their hats or t-shirts?
Lol, just the usual suspects still trying to convince the rest of us that Love was a bad pick because he didn't have the immediate impact that any other player would've had.
