P-E-Z
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2011
- Messages
- 602
- Reaction score
- 51
It seems to todays fumble was bleep happens one. Helmet right on the ball. He had 5 fumbles but most weird hit type things. Should he have been pulled?
It seems to todays fumble was bleep happens one. Helmet right on the ball. He had 5 fumbles but most weird hit type things. Should he have been pulled?
I don't know how you can put James Starks back on the field. His fumbling is becoming a huge problem. That being said, I don't know if we're going to have a choice with the way Lacy is feeling right now with the rib(?) injury..he certainly looked like in was in a lot of discomfort. Boy, there is not one position group on this team that I feel great about right now
Not Ok he one few pieces that actually was gaining made screens workAnd....that's ok?
Not Ok he one few pieces that actually was gaining made screens work
Brings back memories of poor speech after MadDog 20/20."sent from my smartphone"?
The two fumbles he's had were great defensive plays. Woodson ripped him hard last week just before he hit the ground. Yesterday he just got popped with a major league hit just like the one Matthews forced in the SB. Just because Lacy goes in does not guarantee no fumbles. Heck, Adrian Peterson fumbled against us a month ago at a crucial time. And from what I can tell he's still on the field.It seems to todays fumble was bleep happens one. Helmet right on the ball. He had 5 fumbles but most weird hit type things. Should he have been pulled?
Bad things just tend to happen when the ball goes to Adams. Starks has provided us many sparks, while Adams has the opposite effect.This has been MM's policy for years, if a RB fumbles he needs to earn his way back onto the field. Starks is a much more boom/bust runner, however, and generally makes something (good) happen regularly, so a struggling Packer offense can NOT afford to bench him "on principle".
I vehemently oppose this policy NOT being used on Adams, who stays in games only to continue killing drives. Great example at end of 3rd quarter in the AZ game: Adams lets TD pass fly through his fingers, and next play AR went right back to him short of the endzone for a turnover on downs. I'm an OK lip reader and I believe AR was saying to himself "F__ing play call" when Adams was stopped short.
Either McCarthy uses this policy for every player or discontinue it... to remove a weapon from the field for a mistake doesn't help the big-picture of winning a game.
I agree with you partly azrsx05. It's a double-standard regarding the RBs vs QB. Rodgers had three fumbles yet stayed in the game until McCarthy became concerned for his health. Obviously I don't want Rodgers pull but RBs need a little slack. We need production right now with the risk of turnovers vs occasional production (Starks vs Lacy). There must be another way to penalize RBs for turnovers that doesn't violate the CBA.Tailback James Starks fumbled for the fourth time in as many games Sunday against the Cardinals and his playing time quickly dissipated.
Starks played just seven of a possible 72 snaps while fellow running back Eddie Lacy earned 45 snaps. His reps could remain on the low side until he regains the trust of the coaches in practice.
"If you don't take care of the football you won't play," McCarthy said. "That goes without being said. James has put the ball on the ground consecutive weeks now and that's got to stop.
"It obviously affected his reps in the Arizona game."