Packers vs Bears Game Thread: More icky Bear droppings Edition

[Pkrjones]

Jacobs was being dragged backwards while the Bears were clawing at the ball. Is stopped forward motion a 90's thing & no longer exists?

 

[melvin dangerr]

Why that play?? Jacobs averages one touchdown per game with the Packers in his career…he is literally our best in the red zone weapon once Love went down….

Well he did a bad turnover with no TD

 

[OldSchool101]

How do we let a guy run 10 yards up the gut? With 9 in the box!

 

[GreenBaySlacker]

Why that play?? Jacobs averages one touchdown per game with the Packers in his career…he is literally our best in the red zone weapon once Love went down….

He never fumbles .

 

[tynimiller]

Well he did a bad turnover with no TD

You’re purely using hindsight to attack the play call. Anyone saying handing the ball to Jacobs was dumb isn’t right in their head

 

[OldSchool101]

Quay! HUUUUGE!

 

[Cornelius Weems]

How do we let a guy run 10 yards up the gut? With 9 in the box!

Exactly!

 

[GreenBaySlacker]

Never fumbles? I actually thought someone broke down he and Jones fumbled relatively similar in the frequency when we signed him but I could be wrong

Not sure about historical. But I don't remember the last time he fumbled

 

[GreenBaySlacker]

Great stop. Wow that's huge there.

 

[OldSchool101]

HUGE stop!!!

 

[Zartan]

Will this be the drive where we get a TD...

 

[OldSchool101]

Good field position. Let’s get a 6-7 minute and 7 points

 

[SeahawkFan80]

WTF, there should be snow. Is this in Florida?

 

[Aussie Lambeau]

I absolutely love Hafley and our D.

 

[Sanguine camper]

You’re purely using hindsight to attack the play call. Anyone saying handing the ball to Jacobs was dumb isn’t right in their head

Aside from the fumble, Jacobs just seems to lack burst in his legs. He's getting a lot runs with few if any yards. The O line is also responsible but the other Packer runners look quicker.

 

[Aussie Lambeau]

I absolutely love Hafley and our D.

 

[GreenBaySlacker]

Good field position. Let’s get a 6-7 minute and 7 points

6 or 7

 

[OldSchool101]

Or just a quick 7 points. I’m ok with that too!

 

[Cornelius Weems]

Good field position. Let’s get a 6-7 minute and 7 points

Why I would love that, 6-7 minutes at that field position would be crazy.

 

[tynimiller]

Aside from the fumble, Jacobs just seems to lack burst in his legs. He's getting a lot runs with few if any yards. The O line is also responsible but the other Packer runners look quicker.

He literally just a few drives ago bounced twice outside without breaking movement and burst around edge for nine when it looked bottled up. He doesn’t have long speed but dude can cut and burst with the best - crazy thing is he’s been hurt all week too

 

[SeahawkFan80]

Aside from the fumble, Jacobs just seems to lack burst in his legs. He's getting a lot runs with few if any yards. The O line is also responsible but the other Packer runners look quicker.

Is that awesome camper for sale???

 

[OldSchool101]

6 or 7

Even 6 would be ok!

12-3

 

[GreenBaySlacker]

Wilson looked 232 there.

 

[melvin dangerr]

You’re purely using hindsight to attack the play call. Anyone saying handing the ball to Jacobs was dumb isn’t right in their head

No one said it was dumb, down here what would you choose? I would go with a Malik run because he is not going to hold the ball long enough for the Bears to try a take away, I not ruling out Jacobs at all in the red zone but Malik is a good option instead

 

[OldSchool101]

The Bears D must be rethinking things. Defended 49 plays and lots of time left.