Packers resign Walden

[Bensalama21]

I personally think this is a good move. We can always have him compete with the other Packers and rookies in camp.

 

[Southpaw]

I don't like it. Walden is pretty bad. I just hope that we get rid of Zombo. The man cannot stop getting injured. Ugh there is nobody on that right side with any longevity. They are all below average talents. None of them are going to provide any improvement in our defense.

 

[13 Times Champs]

He's horrible. meh

 

[Bensalama21]

He's horrible. meh

What linebacker besides Matthews, Bishop, and maybe Hawk isn't horrible? haha

 

[13 Times Champs]

Hawk sucks too.

 

[MackemPacker]

What linebacker besides Matthews, Bishop, and maybe Hawk isn't horrible? haha

I thought DJ Smith and Francois both looked fairly capable in their starts last season.

 

[IluvGB]

I thought this was a political move! lol the difference between resign and re-sign!

 

[Bensalama21]

I thought DJ Smith and Francois both looked fairly capable in their starts last season.

I believe so too. But What rookie that we draft in the first round will NOT start over Smith or Francois? and if people are calling Hawk "Horrible" (Which I don't agree) then what do you call 2 backups to him?

 

[13 Times Champs]

I didn't say Hawk was "horrible" I said he sucks.

 

[TJV]

If the report that Walden signed for near the league minimum with little or no guaranteed money is true there's no harm in bringing him back. And just like releasing Clifton, I don't think this means anything regarding the draft as neither Clifton nor Walden were going to be relied upon (for entirely different reasons of course). In one of the stories on Walden's contract it was reported that the rosters have been expanded to 90 but all unsigned draftees will count toward that limit. That means if the Packers pick 12 draftees, there'll be 14 spots available for UDFAs.