DataJ3rk
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2014
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 0
Wealth of information here
Speaking of that challenge, it was a good call, but it's a bad rule.
How is it a bad rule? If the ball hits the ground at any point in the process of the catch it's incomplete. Simple.
He didn't take steps, he was stumbling forward. He couldn't have stayed on his feet if he had tried. Any time you go to the ground in the act of catching the ball (which he did) you MUST maintain possession all the way. Even Aikman agreed with the overturn. Garrett didn't even whine about it as much as he usually does.He took a couple steps and dove forward all while keeping position. To me, he had possession and caught that ball.
We can disagree.
He didn't take steps, he was stumbling forward. He couldn't have stayed on his feet if he had tried. Any time you go to the ground in the act of catching the ball (which he did) you MUST maintain possession all the way.
Why shouldn't a receiver be required to control the ball all the way to the ground?
I hate how they get to dodge the cold. Well guess what Jerry? Its going to be blistering cold.
Im happy to see it will be Dallas to get the super special beat down thats reserved for the team that gets in the way of us going to Seattle.......
Jerry Jones better consult his plastic surgeon before coming to GB? He might crack.
Let's not lose sight of something very important about the ruling on Bryant's play. It was not the last play of the game. There would have been plenty of time for Rodgers to bring the Packers down the field again to regain the lead. The alibi is already getting tiresome. Dallas defense was not exactly holding point against Rodgers and Packer offense in the second half. I'm confident that Rodgers would have succeeded. MVPs can do that.