I don't see how me saying that the packers are stuck using what worked for them in 2010 to win the super bowl and are failing to adapt in games when that isn't working anymore has anything to do with the ranking of their scoring offence. It didn't work against the niners, and the running game was doing quite well, so they abandoned the run. this is why the offence failed.
The ranking doesn't mean anything when you are in a playoff game and fail to adjust and lose the game. Stats don't tell the whole story with this offence. A better scoring regular season offence doesn't mean jack come playoff time.
Look at the Niners how they pretty much shut out the falcons 2nd half. the ravens did the same against the best offence in football. did their rankings have anything to do with those games? not a single thing. Your ranking are thrown out the window come playoff time, regular season records don't matter once you make it in, the point is to win the game and the packers failed to do, with a supposed better offence than when they did win in 2010.
I feel they are stuck using (in the playoffs) what won the super bowl in 2010 , and not what got them there in their playoff wins against the eagles, falcons, and bears.
back to the main topic, the offence failed because of poor play calling, rodgers looking for the big play instead of the play to move the chains, and the lack of running the ball. I hate to say it but rodgers to me has regressed a bit this year. He holds onto the ball too long, looks for the big play too often , but he is still a great Qb but needs some work and perhaps that will come with a more balanced attack on offence.