CM_Awesome
Cheesehead
Wow you really don't understand the context of the argument do you? i suggest a critical thinking class next semester and a reading comp as well.
Can we please try to remain civil and not throw insults out at eachother?
Wow you really don't understand the context of the argument do you? i suggest a critical thinking class next semester and a reading comp as well.
Wow you really don't understand the context of the argument do you? i suggest a critical thinking class next semester and a reading comp as well.
Gee.Wow you really don't understand the context of the argument do you? i suggest a critical thinking class next semester and a reading comp as well.
How could you not have known this yet continue to tow the haters' company line that Favre sucks?
This proves my theory that the vast majority of Americans have no clue what is going on in this country - no clue whatsoever. They watch 10 minutes of Sportscenter and drive-by-media reports per day and think they have it all figured out.
As Charlie Brown so perfectly bemoaned, "Ughhhhhhh!!!"
You really taking a guy named....forget favre serious?
LOL
Well I'm not pacing the floor over it. I get where he is. But I have to call out rediculousness when I see it.
Only when it's those not on your side.I have to call out rediculousness when I see it.
Well at least he didnt say Bretts fumble was not a reason for the loss
that would be beyond ridiculous...
Ah ... - Please show me where I've posted that Aaron Rodgers was *directly* responsible for any loss ? ... What I have in fact written time and again, was that he had part (some times less some times more part) in the loss ... - Mostly due to not being able to survey the field fast enough, nor get the ball out quickly when the pocket was collapsing ...
*That* is what I have been saying ... - Would serve you well to perhaps *read* the posts you are referring to before making yourself look like a fool ?
And if you cared to actually read what I wrote, you would clearly or should be able to actually comprehend I was replying to an already posted comment about "wins versus loses" ... - Some how that seemed to have eluded you ... But then again ... you as well seem to be "blinded" by rage and hatred that old #4 is actually still playing well despite it being late in the season and December ... ?, something that is evidently "tearing you up" atm ...
Would seem *You* are the "clueless" one here my friend ...
lol ^^^
fyi
We are packer fans
We have a rival in Minny
Their q/b was OUR q/B, OUR face of the Packers
And you find it odd that we will bash, tear down, and ridicule him every chance we get?
And people say "we" dont have any football knowledge?
I dont find it odd at all. Of course they are a rival and things are not going to be all warm and fuzzy. But the thing is since he left GB many of the fans that loved the guy and defended him now sound like the rest of nation who hated him. And they use the same arguments while discarding what he had done here all those years. I just seems there is a lot of revision going on by *some* fans, not all but some.
There were a lot of fans that loved and respected him when he left. It's not that he was traded away that made us not like the guy anymore, it's the way he conducted himself.
Put that number in your hate pipes and smoke it, *****es!!!
106.4 rating, 321 yards, 2 TD's and ZERO picks - ON THE ROAD, IN DECEMBER and IN THE COLD.
And to echo as others have pointed out:Favre plays great in a loss. Good for him. They still lost. They've lost 3 of 4, 2 of those to teams that won't be in the Playoffs. They can't run the ball, they can't defend the pass, they're looking more and more vulnerable by the week. All 5 of the other playoff teams in the NFC can pass the living hell out of the ball. Minnesota's in a bad way. Right now, they're looking primed for an early exit from the playoffs.
So, good for Brett. Good for him for having a great game. Doesn't matter. The rest of the team was exposed by a 6-9 team. Their defense was exposed by Brett Jr. and a receiving corps led by Devin Aromashadu. They're in trouble, despite however you try to spin what happened last night.
Well pending how this week plays out they may have to wait for week 2 to be bumped by the PackersAnd to echo as others have pointed out:
If this is the Vikes team the Pack plays, the Pack would win the playoffs against them.
But hopefully the Vikes will be taken out in the first round, which also looks likely.
This is a different Vikes team, and they aren't starting as strong as they did. They are getting weaker and weaker by the week.
And to echo as others have pointed out:
If this is the Vikes team the Pack plays, the Pack would win the playoffs against them.
But hopefully the Vikes will be taken out in the first round, which also looks likely.
This is a different Vikes team, and they aren't starting as strong as they did. They are getting weaker and weaker by the week.
Favre plays great in a loss. Good for him. They still lost. They've lost 3 of 4, 2 of those to teams that won't be in the Playoffs. They can't run the ball, they can't defend the pass, they're looking more and more vulnerable by the week. All 5 of the other playoff teams in the NFC can pass the living hell out of the ball. Minnesota's in a bad way. Right now, they're looking primed for an early exit from the playoffs.
So, good for Brett. Good for him for having a great game. Doesn't matter. The rest of the team was exposed by a 6-9 team. Their defense was exposed by Brett Jr. and a receiving corps led by Devin Aromashadu. They're in trouble, despite however you try to spin what happened last night.
To call the Vikings "weak" is a little far fetched, even at this point ... - While the Vikings certainly seem to have some issues it just seems a little too premature to rule them out ... Especially considering that they are still the single ONLY NFL team that hasn't been beat at home ... And a possible wild card game *will* be played in Minnesota ...
And I would like to point out that a GB d was exposed by a struggling Pitt team just days ago...
I would agree with that. I pointed out some problems the Vikes have in my earlier post, but they're still a Super Bowl caliber team. There is no perfect team. New Orleans can't play D anymore, Indy can't run the ball, Philly isn't all that great on D, nobody's perfect. Other teams are peaking right now, though, and I think that's where the Vikings are in a bit of trouble. Even Favre has said they aren't peaking at the right time. We've seen time and time again where it isn't necessarily the best team on paper that gets to the Bowl, it's the team that can get on a hot streak at the right time.
I still wouldn't be completely surprised if Minnesota gets to the Bowl (though right now, I wouldn't bet money on them over Philly/Dallas/Arizona). I remember Arizona getting murdered regularly going into the playoffs last year and they all of a sudden flipped a switch. I don't see why Minny can't do the same.
Agreed.I would agree with that. I pointed out some problems the Vikes have in my earlier post, but they're still a Super Bowl caliber team. There is no perfect team. New Orleans can't play D anymore, Indy can't run the ball, Philly isn't all that great on D, nobody's perfect. Other teams are peaking right now, though, and I think that's where the Vikings are in a bit of trouble. Even Favre has said they aren't peaking at the right time. We've seen time and time again where it isn't necessarily the best team on paper that gets to the Bowl, it's the team that can get on a hot streak at the right time.
I still wouldn't be completely surprised if Minnesota gets to the Bowl (though right now, I wouldn't bet money on them over Philly/Dallas/Arizona). I remember Arizona getting murdered regularly going into the playoffs last year and they all of a sudden flipped a switch. I don't see why Minny can't do the same.
And I would like to point out that a GB d was exposed by a struggling Pitt team just days ago...