all that talent on the Vikings and might very well have same record as the Pack..
How many times in a row has Brett had a rating over 100? Rodgers?
Agreed.I think your just an angry elf
hmm Interesting did not know this Hes had a helluva year I gotta give him thatThis year?
7 for Brett
Rodgers 5
LOL
your pissed at the hatred for Brett on here and I am making a comparison on the other side of the coin..To show it it happens and its just stupid to base things on hatred..Why can't I show you that???
I know because your trying to rub it in my face how Brett had a over 100 rating in the cold and I am taking away from you trying to rub it..I understand now..
And I never said Brett SUCKS in Dec, show me please?
I said it ( 3 times now)
His rating dips below his standard in the cold games, never said will make the team lose.
Its a broken record..
http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/18814-i-called-8.html#post261518
READ it once again please
HIS standard..Take away the cold games stats....8203 atts 270 ints thats REALLY good....every 30 passes an int.. his normal standard..
48 games in the cold 925 atts
47 ints..19th pass is an int... thats really not that good....right?
Make more sense now?
Here check this out
Brett Favre, Like Most Old Men, Doesn't Enjoy ColdWeather - SB Nation
Its not just us saying its every analyst in the NFL almost
hmm Interesting did not know this Hes had a helluva year I gotta give him that
Uh, nobody likes cold weather and it affects everybody. However, last nite the weather proved hit had less effect on Brett Favre than the Bears defense and Childress' lack of foresight.
Once Chilly let Brett be Brett and let go of the silly notion that All Day can carry a team, suddenly the Bears defense became pedestrian and Favre ate them alive.
You guys can either continue with the urban myth stuff or you can use the brain the Good Lord gave ya'll and wake up and smell the coffee. You either live your life with your head stuck in the sand, or you live it with eyes wide open. You choose.
But not enough to win the game.Once Chilly let Brett be Brett and let go of the silly notion that All Day can carry a team, suddenly the Bears defense became pedestrian and Favre ate them alive.
You guys can either continue with the urban myth stuff or you can use the brain the Good Lord gave ya'll and wake up and smell the coffee. You either live your life with your head stuck in the sand, or you live it with eyes wide open. You choose.
Why r u taking this so much to heart man live a little and have fun. Of course everyone here is going to complain about Favre no matter what. After being a franshise QB for the Packers and then you jump ship to a Rival team is going to stir up emotion in everyone.
But not enough to win the game.
All he had to do was get the team into F.G. range. He failed to do that.
And he had tons of chances. Even in O.T.
So da Bears D-Fence did not fail.
Child please.
In case you don't know, you are on a Green Bay Packer fan forum. You are not on the Brett Farv msg board where they worship their golden boy and kiss his toes and think he's the greatest thing since sliced bread.
That's the place to be for your kinds of posts.
Do you really think that you are going to win any pro-Farv arguments on here? Or get any Pack fan to agree with you? Especially since he is a traitor to our beloved team? And since they lost to a team that the Pack beat twice this season both home and away?
You need to heed your own advice which I've reposted below:
Because I don't care for misinformation - it destroys all things good.
I expect Packers fans to embody class and integrity and character. Favre is a helluvan NFL QB and to fabricated lies and falsehoods to somehow make Green Bay out to be better really disappoints and sometimes infuriates me.
Expect nothing but the best and settle for nothing less.
Well ya sorta got me there.You're obviously writing these things just to get a reaction because you prove you are not a very smart guy.
Whatever.You are a very unreliable poster and you have proven that what you say about the Brett Favre situation is based on all speculation and conjecture and no facts.
So you can dish it out but you can't take it. Buh buy. :bye:As a result, I can no longer - in good faith - reply to any additional posts you provide on Brett Favre. I hope you can appreciate my position.
Oh. And one more thing. Vikes lost. That's all that matters and that speaks volumes. :viksux:
This is where you lose guys like me because this didn't seem to matter to you and others when Minnesota won both games against Green Bay this season.
This is the very essence of what I am getting at - you guys let your hate overrule your common sense and good judgment. It happens, but it that certainly doesn't make it justified.
For example, almost 90% of the haters' argument on or after December 13 was that Favre sucked in December. Now that Favre dominated an opponent ON THE ROAD, IN THE COLD and IN DECEMBER, somehow now, the argument gets conveniently switched from Favre sucking in December to only wins and losses matter. It's classic straw-man arguments in their most obvious forms.
Exactly.Sorry to hop in on this convo but I just gotta say that he didnt "dominate" anyone...if he did they would have won. Looks like the Vikes O-line is just about as bad as ours was at the beginning of the year 9 sacks in the past 3 games....ouch!
Sorry to hop in on this convo but I just gotta say that he didnt "dominate" anyone...if he did they would have won. Looks like the Vikes O-line is just about as bad as ours was at the beginning of the year 9 sacks in the past 3 games....ouch!
Sorry to hop in on this convo but I just gotta say that he didnt "dominate" anyone...if he did they would have won. Looks like the Vikes O-line is just about as bad as ours was at the beginning of the year 9 sacks in the past 3 games....ouch!
I don't care if you wanna play the childish, "I know what I did, but look at what so-and-so did...." games, but I'd prefer it not be on a thread that targets ONE SPECIFIC AREA.
Well it's more exciting to win than to lose.This is where you lose guys like me because this didn't seem to matter to you and others when Minnesota won both games against Green Bay this season.
This is the very essence of what I am getting at - you guys let your hate overrule your common sense and good judgment. It happens, but it that certainly doesn't make it justified.
For example, almost 90% of the haters' argument on or after December 13 was that Favre sucked in December. Now that Favre dominated an opponent ON THE ROAD, IN THE COLD and IN DECEMBER, somehow now, the argument gets conveniently switched from Favre sucking in December to only wins and losses matter. It's classic straw-man arguments in their most obvious forms.
Well it's more exciting to win than to lose.
And when the team your pulling for loses, you take a step back, anyalize, asess, become more contemplative, look at the stats etc.
And when the team you want to win, wins, one doesn't need to look at the stats. They won and that's all that matters.
So Child, I have a feeling your posts would be a lot more different had the Vikes won and if the Pack had lost this week.
You would be all over here rubbing that in our faces. (Stats be damned.)
But since it's the other way around, the best you can do is to try to show us that Burnt is still the best QB, ever. Even when his team loses. And I ain't buyin that. (For now I think the best ever was Joe Montana.)
He did make a good effort. But face it. Da Bears were the better team last night.
Vikes fan or not ya gotta give Jay Cutler props for throwing THE winning TD in O-Time. It was a pass that Farve and his fans could only look on with defeat and envy.
Child please. You are doing nothing but just reaching for an argument that is irrelevant on this forum.