Week 9: Packers in New England

shockerx

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
306
Reaction score
91
Packers special teams have sucked for a while. If Crosby doesn't put it deep in the end zone it seems the other team always seems the get it past the thirty. We can't seem receive a punt or a kick off without a flag for holding or illegal block in the back. Our kick returns seem to never reach the 20. Hiring Ron Zook was NOT the answer.
right on the money!....bullseye
 

BostonBlackie

Cheesehead
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
It isn't between Brady and Rodgers. It's between Brady and Manning.

Manning and Brady played each other seventeen times.[9] Brady led the head-to-head series 11–6. From 2001–2015, the two quarterbacks met at least once every season, with the following exceptions: the Colts and Patriots, longtime AFC East division rivals from 1970–2001, did not meet in 2002 following the NFL's divisional re-alignment; Brady suffered a season-ending knee injury in Week 1 of the 2008 season; Manning missed the entire 2011 season due to recovery from multiple neck surgeries, as well as the 2015 regular-season meeting due to recovery from a torn plantar fascia. Brady led the Colts–Patriots series 8–4[10] and also led the Broncos–Patriots series 3–2,[11] though Manning's two wins with the Broncos both occurred in the AFC Championships in 2013 and 2015. Brady led the series in Foxborough 8–2 (7–2 at Gillette Stadium), while Manning led the series in Indianapolis/Denver 4–3.[11] The home team won each of the final seven games, with the last road win for either quarterback in the rivalry coming in Brady's 2007 win at Indianapolis.

The two quarterbacks met five times in the NFL Playoffs, in which Manning led the playoff series 3–2. Each of the five games was won by the home team. Brady led 2–1 vs. Manning's Colts' teams, while Manning's Broncos' teams led 2–0. Four of the five matchups were in the AFC Championship Game, with Manning winning three out of four, one with the Colts and two with the Broncos.

The winner of the playoff games went on to be the eventual Super Bowl winner, with the exception of the 2014 matchup.[11]
 

rmontro

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Messages
4,618
Reaction score
1,287
I always find it amusing when analysts state there’s no debate because Brady has 5 rings. They ignore the fact that Rodgers has played 8 less seasons than Brady. (Due to younger age) Rodgers has way more time than Brady to add to his resume.
That would make sense if Rodgers was on pace to win five, but he isn't.
There are also those who say that Brady will play until about 45, whereas Rodgers will not because his style of play leads to more injuries.
 

Title Town USA

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
505
Reaction score
51
That would make sense if Rodgers was on pace to win five, but he isn't.
There are also those who say that Brady will play until about 45, whereas Rodgers will not because his style of play leads to more injuries.
”Pace” is not really relevant. Brady won 3 SuperBowls within 4 years. It’s dependent on the whole team.

Also, Rodgers could play until he’s 45 as well. He can throw from the pocket as well as Brady. He chooses to also use his legs because he can, and Brady can’t. He can adjust his game as he ages. He has lots of time.
 
Last edited:

PackAttack12

R-E-L-A-X
Joined
Sep 16, 2016
Messages
6,499
Reaction score
2,157
I always find it amusing when analysts state there’s no debate because Brady has 5 rings. They ignore the fact that Rodgers has played 8 less seasons than Brady. (Due to younger age) Rodgers has way more time than Brady to add to his resume.
That’s definitely the one thing Rodgers has in his favor. Gotta get busy though.
 

BostonBlackie

Cheesehead
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm coming to the conclusion that it's an impossible debate. Brady has Kraft and Belichick, meaning the Patriots hit the trifecta. It's apples and oranges. Can you say Rodgers talent overcomes Brady's work ethic? Don't know.
 

PackAttack12

R-E-L-A-X
Joined
Sep 16, 2016
Messages
6,499
Reaction score
2,157
J.K. Scott is active and punting tonight.

Geronimo Allison is inactive.

Boyle, Kaser, Brown, Toomer, McCray, Light rounds out the inactive list.

For the Patriots, Gronk and Michel inactive along with Mason. Loving it.
 

Packer96

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
313
Reaction score
31
I love our guy, but in my mind Montana is #1. The 80's to mid 90's were as good as football get's. No free agency, teams could be built and held together. Can't remember the year but except for a BS call the Niners had an undefeated team. That was a time when the QB could get smoked.
 

Poppa San

* Team Owner *
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
12,875
Reaction score
2,772
Location
20 miles from Lambeau
he was more than 5 yards off. and made no play on the ball. Its hard to defend packers special teams...everyone knows it.
Posters exaggerate for effect. The camera not so much.
You must be logged in to see this image or video!

Just after the snap of the ball. King back pedals then turns his hips to follow the gunner. Shields puts on the brakes to receive the ball. Again, where would you have King standing at the snap, knowing Shields is faster than King. Also at no time is King further than ten yards from Sam. Kings defense starts at :26
For your information, see those white lines drawn on the field? They denote five yards.
 

Mondio

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
15,893
Reaction score
3,797
It feels like it’s been dark for the past 6 hours already, is it game time yet?
 

shockerx

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
306
Reaction score
91
Posters exaggerate for effect. The camera not so much.
You must be logged in to see this image or video!

Just after the snap of the ball. King back pedals then turns his hips to follow the gunner. Shields puts on the brakes to receive the ball. Again, where would you have King standing at the snap, knowing Shields is faster than King. Also at no time is King further than ten yards from Sam. Kings defense starts at :26
For your information, see those white lines drawn on the field? They denote five yards.
what an up hill battle to to defend zook and special teams play. looks like the in the pic sam has covered few yards. anyhow a punter threw the pass.... must have been a frozen rope...cause king made no play on the ball. if the rams covert that play uncontested....its bad special team play period.
 

Packer Fan in SD

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
827
Reaction score
168
It was 4th and 3 at the Rams 45. While Shields May have lined up behind the line of scrimmage, King was within 5 yards of both the line and of Shields when the ball was hiked.
 
Last edited:

shockerx

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
306
Reaction score
91
opening kickoff. penalty....pats start at 40 yard line...how do you defend special teams.
 

Eduardo Valadares

Cheesehead
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Messages
33
Reaction score
7
This is the best roster we have since last SB win. We have good players both sides of the ball. We just need better game plans, better coaching indeed.
 

TB5XSBW

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 29, 2018
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
I tried to tell you guys.

Your defense isn't very good at stopping what we do best.

Ours definitely matches up well with your offense, because your team likes to pass the ball downfield, and we have the best secondary in the league.



https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-ranking-the-nflstop-defenses-after-week-8

We also play a lot of cover 1, which is an ideal counter to the switch concepts that your team uses.

I don't see why some here think GB's offense matches up well vs NE's defense. Football is all about scheme, personnel, and match ups, not about offensive or defensive rankings.

The Packers don't really do the things on offense that have posed issues for NE's defense. The Packers' RBs are not a threat in the passing game, and their TEs have been mediocre at best. Most of GB's chunk gains have come from their vertical passing game from switch concept, which doesn't really work as well against what NE does on defense - a lot of cover 1 with a safety dropping into robber.

Adams will be a problem, and will probably be double teamed with JMac and a safety. Other than that, I don't see many offensive threats. Graham is soft and has been shut down by Belichick before. Jonathan Jones has been very good as a slot CB, while Cobb hasn't really produced this season. Allison will likely be taken out of the game completely by Gilmore.

On the other side of the ball, GB hasn't shown that they can get to the QB with just 4 consistently. That's the death knell for a zone team against Brady. Their LBs also can't cover RBs or TEs.

A lot of the things GB does on offense with their switch concepts don't really work against a good cover 1 team like NE. I expect them to move the ball between the 20s, but they will likely be held to 24 or under.

And now I am waiting to see how this plays out...

I can see it now.

Before the game: "Patriots' defense sucks. It's the worst Rodgers has played this season!"

After NE's convincing victory: "Brady only beat Rodgers because he has a better defense. Rodgers always has terrible luck and a trash defense. Not his fault!"
 
Top