D
Deleted member 6794
Guest
Just going by the definition that Rodgers winning only 1 SB has been a waste so far...
Favre, far more than Rodgers, was responsible for the Packers not winning another championship with him starting though.
Just going by the definition that Rodgers winning only 1 SB has been a waste so far...
I heard a funny exchange on Undisputed this morning. Well, I thought it was funny anyway.
They were comparing Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady. Skip Bayless was railing on about Bill Belichick not playing Malcom Butler in the Super Bowl earlier this year.
Skip said: "When's the last time Mike McCarthy held his best defensive end out of a football game?:
Shannon Sharpe said: "Mike McCarthy hasn't had a best defensive end. Well, not since Charles Woodson left".
Sad but true. Laugh or cry.
Dammit, I meant defensive BACK. I fixed it. Stupid brain farts. Ruined the jokeI didn't realize Woodson and Butler were defensive ends
This was a minor story today. Derek Carr, the Raiders quarterback, has been praising Jordy Nelson and expressed shock that the Packers let him go.
Cowherd addressed the story, saying it's an indication that the Packers don't care about keeping Rodgers' favorite guys.
I know releasing Jordy was a mix of opening up cap space and concern about his injuries.
I just hope we don't regret it.
Yeah, I suppose. I want to see Jordy do well with the Raiders anyway (unless it's against us).Better a year early...
Yeah, I suppose. I want to see Jordy do well with the Raiders anyway (unless it's against us).
The only thing that kind of bothers me is Carr said he gets open easily. And that was a supposed knock against him last year, that he wasn't able to get open anymore. I hope that's not an indictment against the way McCarthy structures his routes (as has been discussed a lot), and if it is I hope it's getting fixed this year.
That may say more about the Raiders defense than Nelsons ability.Yeah, I suppose. I want to see Jordy do well with the Raiders anyway (unless it's against us).
The only thing that kind of bothers me is Carr said he gets open easily. And that was a supposed knock against him last year, that he wasn't able to get open anymore. I hope that's not an indictment against the way McCarthy structures his routes (as has been discussed a lot), and if it is I hope it's getting fixed this year.
Yeah, I suppose. I want to see Jordy do well with the Raiders anyway (unless it's against us).
The only thing that kind of bothers me is Carr said he gets open easily. And that was a supposed knock against him last year, that he wasn't able to get open anymore. I hope that's not an indictment against the way McCarthy structures his routes (as has been discussed a lot), and if it is I hope it's getting fixed this year.
Maybe not, but Carr seemed to be impressed by it.There's no reason to put any stock into Nelson getting open in practice.
Maybe not, but Carr seemed to be impressed by it.
Once again, I don't care about coaches or players being impressed by anyone during practice. In my opinion the Raiders paid way too mich money for Nelson. But we'll have to wait and see until the regular season to make a fair assessment of it.
Or maybe it's, "dammit, I meant Cullen Jenkins".Dammit, I meant defensive BACK. I fixed it. Stupid brain farts. Ruined the joke
As an FYI, under the latest rule changes it would be a catch, with the rules now more closely respecting the athleticism. From Rule 8, Article 3 of the 2018 Rule Book:Freaking Skip Bayless is still whining about the Packers beating the Cowboys in the playoffs because "Dez Bryant caught that ball" in 2014...,
Cutting Nelson cleared the cap space to sign Graham.This was a minor story today. Derek Carr, the Raiders quarterback, has been praising Jordy Nelson and expressed shock that the Packers let him go.
Cowherd addressed the story, saying it's an indication that the Packers don't care about keeping Rodgers' favorite guys.
I know releasing Jordy was a mix of opening up cap space and concern about his injuries.
I just hope we don't regret it.
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...-the-packers-ended-up-releasing-jordy-nelson/
Favre, far more than Rodgers, was responsible for the Packers not winning another championship with him starting though.
Rodgers is in the news today because he was critical of some of our wide receivers, calling their effort p!ss poor. I'm seeing this characterized in the media as everything from Rodgers being unhappy that he doesn't have his contract, to him being a poor teammate who kicks WRs under the bus.
Maybe I missed the context of this comment but I'm confused. Are you saying that Favre is responsible for the Packers not winning more Super Bowls during Rodgers' starting career or Favre's?
More importantly, under the rules when the game was played, it was not a catch. Anyway, even if he had caught that ball, the game wasn't over. The Packers would have had the ball back.As an FYI, under the latest rule changes it would be a catch
Rodgers apparently said quite a few things the other day. Talking about how he didn't like the franchise tag, wanted to ditch the hard salary cap in favor of a soft cap plus luxury tax like in the NBA, and said there should be more player mobility. Those comments about the franchise tag and player mobility might sound a little ominous, you could read that as his being frustrated at being stuck in Green Bay. I know he's always said he wants to finish his career here, but still why is he bringing that up? Maybe he just wants to push player rights forward, that seems to be an activist interest of his.
I'm absolutely fine with Rodgers criticizing the rookie receivers for their poor effort in practice. Hopefully it lights a fire under at least one of them. Otherwise it seems Allison, Yancey and Kumerow will stay ahead of them on the depth chart.
Really??? Obviously I was talking about Favre being responsible for the Packers not making it to another Super Bowl while he was the starting quarterback.