Zero2Cool said:
So if Fergie, so what's the diff?
At least this guy can fly...
Zero2Cool said:
TomAllen said:Zero2Cool said:
So if Fergie, so what's the diff?
At least this guy can fly...
TomAllen said:Zero2Cool said:
So if Fergie, so what's the diff?
At least this guy can fly...
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:24 amSuperRat said:Wow I was waiting for somebody to bring up getting Pinkston but after it didn't happen right away I figured the forum members had enough sense not to mention it.
SuperRat said:It isnt you that is ridiculous in this thread. That is understandable if you dont know much about the reciever and were just wondering. The people talking about how pinkston is better than ferguson and gardner and say that he would be a good pickup that are nuts. Pinkston is known for not wanting to be hit. He is known for missing a wide open catch i think last year or the year before because he "lost the ball in the lights" though it looked like he was just scared there as well, not to mention this more recent case of not trying to catch the ball because he is scared. I dont like Ferguson at all but I would rather have him than Pinkston.
tromadz said:so bring in another suckbag? TT did that with Boreigter and you guys bashed him. But ..do it again, right?
wow.
TomAllen said:tromadz said:so bring in another suckbag? TT did that with Boreigter and you guys bashed him. But ..do it again, right?
wow.
This suckbag is a little better than the 2 suckbags on the Packer roster now.
TomAllen said:Yeah..
HOw many interceptions did Robert Ferguson cause by not going for the ball?
Answer: Quite a few.
I really don't care about Pinkston, just get rid of Fergusen TT, and go after Porter or Branch...or someone decent...jeez!
pyledriver80 said:Go get him TT. This would be a good signinig IMO.
TomAllen said:Yeah, if you see my initial post, I said i wasn't that hot on him..but I really do believe he'd be an upgrade over Fergie and Gardner.
arrowgargantuan said:cmon, you don't think the eagles cut him for health reasons?
Stallworth is their #1 for god sake. they wouldn't cut a healthy Pinkston imo.
arrowgargantuan said:1. Pinkston is coming off a season ending injury.
2. He was just cut by a team with Less talent in the WR dept. than the Pack.
that speaks volumes to me.