The bigest match up in the the bears game

Packnic

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
2,454
Reaction score
6
Location
Salisbury, NC
Packers running game vs. Bears Defensive Line. If GB can establish the run against the Bears then they should win the game. If not then it'll be another close one.


why bother running the ball ....

their D-line is still strong and they get good pressure... just concentrate on pass protection and pass the ball 50 times.

they have 0-4 starting DBs available... why wouldnt you attack that.

i dont think we should even run the ball.... just passes out to the flats and quick slants as a replacment for the run game.
 

tromadz

Cheesehead
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
999
Reaction score
3
Location
Chicago
porky88 said:
Packers running game vs. Bears Defensive Line. If GB can establish the run against the Bears then they should win the game. If not then it'll be another close one.


why bother running the ball ....

their D-line is still strong and they get good pressure... just concentrate on pass protection and pass the ball 50 times.

they have 0-4 starting DBs available... why wouldnt you attack that.

i dont think we should even run the ball.... just passes out to the flats and quick slants as a replacment for the run game.

Because you have to run the ball no matter what. It's a rule. You run the ball, even if it hurts your team!

Wait, what?
 

porky88

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
3,991
Reaction score
0
Location
Title Town
porky88 said:
Packers running game vs. Bears Defensive Line. If GB can establish the run against the Bears then they should win the game. If not then it'll be another close one.


why bother running the ball ....

their D-line is still strong and they get good pressure... just concentrate on pass protection and pass the ball 50 times.

they have 0-4 starting DBs available... why wouldnt you attack that.

i dont think we should even run the ball.... just passes out to the flats and quick slants as a replacment for the run game.

Your right it does depend on who the Bears have out there. If Vasher, Tillman, and Archuleta all miss this game then the Packers should attack through the air once again.

This is the first time in two weeks that the Packers are facing a team that they could potentially run against. Nobody runs on the Vikings anyways and the Chargers are also weak against the pass. GB game planned that way. I think even if we had a good running game, Green Bay would've thrown 40 times against those two teams because we were attacking their weakness.

My point isn't that we can't win with the Packers throwing 40 to 50 times again. If Favre is efficient we can win that way. I just don't know if the Packers can win BIG that way. With a running game, this team really would have no weakness that I can think of off the top of my head. So that's why the running game is important at least in my mind.
 

brennan1884

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
841
Reaction score
0
You think this is the biggest matchup.......Olsen barely played against the Lions and has been NON-Existant all season. Im not concerned with this in the least.

Id say the biggest matchup will be the special teams play becuase our offense will score and our d will be stout,.....

can we stop devin hester???

peace
 

Aytumious

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 16, 2006
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
Technically he is the 1, packnic, But not really. Berrian is the bigger threat, and has become the #1 target on that team, especially with moose playing banged up. But since he is the #2, whoever of the BIG TWO isn't on Berrian, will take Moose.

Honestly I wouldn't mind seeing it match up like this in 3 WR sets

Moose - Bush
Berrian - Chuck
Hester - Al

Bush CAN easily defend Moose. He is old, and hurt. Unless you have some type of vendetta against Bush and can't think logically.

I think it's funny. This is the worst WR group in the NFL, and people are getting scared.

Hester is barely ever on the field on offense and if he is it is for some blatant gimmick screen or reverse. Davis is their #3.

Moose has looked horrible this year. He can barely run a route that requires any type of sharp cut.

Berrian is dropping passes at an alarming rate and is running a lot of bad routes.

Though not mentioned in your post, Olsen isn't playing all that much either since they don't use 2 TE formations all that often and they leave Clark in there most of the time for some reason in their normal set.

The Bears receiving corp is putrid right now.
 

dhpackr

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
1,635
Reaction score
0
Location
SE Wisconsin
tromadz said:
Technically he is the 1, packnic, But not really. Berrian is the bigger threat, and has become the #1 target on that team, especially with moose playing banged up. But since he is the #2, whoever of the BIG TWO isn't on Berrian, will take Moose.

Honestly I wouldn't mind seeing it match up like this in 3 WR sets

Moose - Bush
Berrian - Chuck
Hester - Al

Bush CAN easily defend Moose. He is old, and hurt. Unless you have some type of vendetta against Bush and can't think logically.

I think it's funny. This is the worst WR group in the NFL, and people are getting scared.

Hester is barely ever on the field on offense and if he is it is for some blatant gimmick screen or reverse. Davis is their #3.

Moose has looked horrible this year. He can barely run a route that requires any type of sharp cut.

Berrian is dropping passes at an alarming rate and is running a lot of bad routes.

Though not mentioned in your post, Olsen isn't playing all that much either since they don't use 2 TE formations all that often and they leave Clark in there most of the time for some reason in their normal set.

The Bears receiving corp is putrid right now.

what if after a 1-3 start, the bears go with a dbl te set, and put hester in as the # 3 WR out of the slot?
 

Zero2Cool

I own a website
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Messages
11,903
Reaction score
4
Location
Green Bay, WI
what if after a 1-3 start, the bears go with a dbl te set, and put hester in as the # 3 WR out of the slot?

3 WR
2 TE
1 QB
5 OL

Empty backfield?

The Bears QB then gets to meet our DL and our secondary gets the advantage of snagging some picks from a QB who is not good under pressure. Neither Rex nor Brian are good at handling the blitz.
 

Aytumious

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 16, 2006
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
Aytumious said:
tromadz said:
Technically he is the 1, packnic, But not really. Berrian is the bigger threat, and has become the #1 target on that team, especially with moose playing banged up. But since he is the #2, whoever of the BIG TWO isn't on Berrian, will take Moose.

Honestly I wouldn't mind seeing it match up like this in 3 WR sets

Moose - Bush
Berrian - Chuck
Hester - Al

Bush CAN easily defend Moose. He is old, and hurt. Unless you have some type of vendetta against Bush and can't think logically.

I think it's funny. This is the worst WR group in the NFL, and people are getting scared.

Hester is barely ever on the field on offense and if he is it is for some blatant gimmick screen or reverse. Davis is their #3.

Moose has looked horrible this year. He can barely run a route that requires any type of sharp cut.

Berrian is dropping passes at an alarming rate and is running a lot of bad routes.

Though not mentioned in your post, Olsen isn't playing all that much either since they don't use 2 TE formations all that often and they leave Clark in there most of the time for some reason in their normal set.

The Bears receiving corp is putrid right now.

what if after a 1-3 start, the bears go with a dbl te set, and put hester in as the # 3 WR out of the slot?

It would probably make Bears fans happy. They want to see Olsen and Hester out there a lot more. Some are even calling for Mike Haas to start (do most people even know who he is?).
 

dhpackr

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
1,635
Reaction score
0
Location
SE Wisconsin
dhpackr said:
what if after a 1-3 start, the bears go with a dbl te set, and put hester in as the # 3 WR out of the slot?

3 WR
2 TE
1 QB
5 OL

Empty backfield?

The Bears QB then gets to meet our DL and our secondary gets the advantage of snagging some picks from a QB who is not good under pressure. Neither Rex nor Brian are good at handling the blitz.

i meant two seperate plays

one would feAture a dbl TE set
another would feature hester in tthe slot at WR
at 1-3, the bears may try something new.
 

Zero2Cool

I own a website
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Messages
11,903
Reaction score
4
Location
Green Bay, WI
Zero2Cool said:
dhpackr said:
what if after a 1-3 start, the bears go with a dbl te set, and put hester in as the # 3 WR out of the slot?

3 WR
2 TE
1 QB
5 OL

Empty backfield?

The Bears QB then gets to meet our DL and our secondary gets the advantage of snagging some picks from a QB who is not good under pressure. Neither Rex nor Brian are good at handling the blitz.

i meant two seperate plays

one would feAture a dbl TE set
another would feature hester in tthe slot at WR
at 1-3, the bears may try something new.
Oh. I missed the part about being separate plays. My bad.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top