ArizonaPackerFan
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2004
- Messages
- 729
- Reaction score
- 0
OK, I'm refreshed now, and ready for next week's game against the Browns. Go Pack!
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
CaliforniaCheez said:1) The defense played better than expected.
a. They will be better if the offense can occaisionally not go 3 & out every series.
b. They will be better with Thomas starting at CB.
c. Satety Mark Roman should not be the Packers leading tackler.
d. Detroit is not an offensive powerhouse so they should look good.
e. They did not get a turnover and penalties sustained drives.
2) Special Teams coverage did better than expected.
a. There were few kick off coverage opportunities but covered well enough.
b. Sander punted 6 times 41.3 average.
c. Longwell hit a 50 yard FG.
3) Miscellaneous
a. On offense Henderson and Tauscher played well
b. Whitticker played adequate with a false start penalty.
c. Ahman Green did not fumble.
Those are the positives as the Packers prepare for next week.
Thanks for that in depth commentary PackerChick.PackerChick said:CaliforniaCheez said:1) The defense played better than expected.
a. They will be better if the offense can occaisionally not go 3 & out every series.
b. They will be better with Thomas starting at CB.
c. Satety Mark Roman should not be the Packers leading tackler.
d. Detroit is not an offensive powerhouse so they should look good.
e. They did not get a turnover and penalties sustained drives.
2) Special Teams coverage did better than expected.
a. There were few kick off coverage opportunities but covered well enough.
b. Sander punted 6 times 41.3 average.
c. Longwell hit a 50 yard FG.
3) Miscellaneous
a. On offense Henderson and Tauscher played well
b. Whitticker played adequate with a false start penalty.
c. Ahman Green did not fumble.
Those are the positives as the Packers prepare for next week.
very good observation.
ArizonaPackerFan said:OK, I'm refreshed now, and ready for next week's game against the Browns. Go Pack!
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Thanks for that in depth commentary PackerChick.Philtration said:PackerChick said:CaliforniaCheez said:1) The defense played better than expected.
a. They will be better if the offense can occaisionally not go 3 & out every series.
b. They will be better with Thomas starting at CB.
c. Satety Mark Roman should not be the Packers leading tackler.
d. Detroit is not an offensive powerhouse so they should look good.
e. They did not get a turnover and penalties sustained drives.
2) Special Teams coverage did better than expected.
a. There were few kick off coverage opportunities but covered well enough.
b. Sander punted 6 times 41.3 average.
c. Longwell hit a 50 yard FG.
3) Miscellaneous
a. On offense Henderson and Tauscher played well
b. Whitticker played adequate with a false start penalty.
c. Ahman Green did not fumble.
Those are the positives as the Packers prepare for next week.
very good observation.
Thanks for that in depth commentary PackerChick.PackerChick said:Philtration said:PackerChick said:CaliforniaCheez said:1) The defense played better than expected.
a. They will be better if the offense can occaisionally not go 3 & out every series.
b. They will be better with Thomas starting at CB.
c. Satety Mark Roman should not be the Packers leading tackler.
d. Detroit is not an offensive powerhouse so they should look good.
e. They did not get a turnover and penalties sustained drives.
2) Special Teams coverage did better than expected.
a. There were few kick off coverage opportunities but covered well enough.
b. Sander punted 6 times 41.3 average.
c. Longwell hit a 50 yard FG.
3) Miscellaneous
a. On offense Henderson and Tauscher played well
b. Whitticker played adequate with a false start penalty.
c. Ahman Green did not fumble.
Those are the positives as the Packers prepare for next week.
very good observation.