1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

It's go time!!!

Discussion in 'Green Bay Packers Fan Forum' started by GreenBaySlacker, Aug 14, 2019 at 9:36 PM.

  1. GreenBaySlacker

    GreenBaySlacker Cheesehead

    Messages:
    2,871
    Likes Received:
    164
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2014
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    After a little old school coaxing. I realized the Off season whine session needs to be over. Yeaaaaa. It was different.... Its new... Its youth taking the reigns...

    I remember when #12 took over. There was major turmoil in packerdom.
    I was one of the raging mad loyalists who wanted Favre... And didn't get Favre....
    After a good week of straight bitching.... I had a flip. I decided this young qb. If he was ever going to have ANY chance of success. He would need his loyal packer backers.....

    Without all the fog of hatred. I had a clear view of Rodgers rise. And historic success winning the super bowl... It was awesome backing that underdog and winning it all... Better than going 15-1 and steamrolling through the playoffs. Imo. It was a glorious battle... And we won...

    So I think.... Even though these obviously stoned mofos took too much and didn't get my Clemson nose. I am ready to saddle up and get ready for battle... :)

    All this new speed.... We are going to Swarm........

    Its go time!!!
     
  2. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Messages:
    12,486
    Likes Received:
    867
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Packer Fan Since:
    1959
    September 5th. is go time. Given the raggedy play in the NFL the first few weeks, go time might be week 4 at home against the Eagles.
     
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2019 at 8:36 AM
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  3. PackAttack12

    PackAttack12 R-E-L-A-X

    Messages:
    2,818
    Likes Received:
    378
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2016
    Packer Fan Since:
    1919
    Sad, but true.
     
  4. Mondio

    Mondio Cheesehead

    Messages:
    8,930
    Likes Received:
    799
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2014
    Packer Fan Since:
    1980
    I'm glad i'll be at the Stadium for the start of the season :)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. OldSchool101

    OldSchool101 Peerless Beer, Lacrosse WI

    Messages:
    3,589
    Likes Received:
    425
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Packer Fan Since:
    1973
    I always take the blame!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. GreenBaySlacker

    GreenBaySlacker Cheesehead

    Messages:
    2,871
    Likes Received:
    164
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2014
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    You da man old school. :)

    And it was time to end my hold out anyways. Get back to work backing the pack...

    Im optimistic... But my concern is injury..... I'm remembering back to the last championship... If I remember right, we had very few injuries ... The oline stayed intact I think .. The whole team came together midseason and peaked when other teams were breaking down.
    In the same thought on the other side... If there was 10 min more in the game after woodson went out. I doubt we win it...

    So injuries... Thats the missing link. We have the qb. We have the weapons offensive and defensive both. Just need to stay healthy...
    And gute has made choices based on that , I believe... 2nd contract. Good injury histories... All the free agents should be there to contribute week 18 , if the numbers play out properly...

    Gary..... Fastest 40 by a guy his size.... Ever?
     
  7. captainWIMM

    captainWIMM Cheesehead

    Messages:
    22,281
    Likes Received:
    1,122
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Packer Fan Since:
    1995
    According to Football Outsiders Adjusted Games Lost metric the Packers were the third most injured team when they won the Super Bowl in 2010.

    That team had a lot of quality depth though.
     
  8. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Messages:
    12,486
    Likes Received:
    867
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Packer Fan Since:
    1959
    The 2010 injury losses were considerable with several starters missing large chunks of the season. Scroll to the bottom of the following link. Red boxes are missed games:

    https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/gnb/2010_injuries.htm

    As for the O-Line, Taucher missed the back half of the season. Perhaps the biggest loss was Ryan Grant. The running game was anemic all season with Brandon Jackson as the #1 until they plugged Starks in at the end of the season and for the playoffs.

    What the chart does not show is Woodson going out of the Super Bowl in the first half with a broken collar bone. Shields also went out in the first half, but came back for the second and the defense held it together.
     
  9. Half Empty

    Half Empty Cheesehead

    Messages:
    3,449
    Likes Received:
    197
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2014
    Packer Fan Since:
    1958
    Agree on the number and extent of injuries. What I always come back to, though, is that those injuries were either to (1) "who's that?" players, (2) players who were replaced with better options, or (3) players who were replaced with guys who had career years. Obviously, room for debate on certain guys/positions, but, overall, it was the definition of "next man up".
     
  10. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Messages:
    12,486
    Likes Received:
    867
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Packer Fan Since:
    1959
    You evidently did not look at the link in the my post just above yours. There are quite a few guys who were not "who's that?" players that missed half the games or more.

    If it was "next man up" then why assume it would not be this time? Wait, I know the answer.

    2010 had a very strong defensive core playing at the peaks of their careers: Raji, Matthews, Jenkins, Hawk, Woodson, Collins and Tramon Williams, a group that missed only three games between them, all Jenkins. Then Harris came off PUP midseason for the run. The QB and WRs were a strong offensive core as well even if the Finley dynamic wasn't replaced. Good O-Line with only Taucher missing the back half of the season. The notable "next men up" were Bishop for Barnett (addition by subtraction in my opinion), and Starks taking over the #1 RB position though that was a Jackson performance issue not an injury situation.

    In short, the key difference between then and now is the 2010 team had a very strong roster and nearly all the core difference makers missed few games. You might say that team underperformed getting to 10-6 were it not for the lousy running game before Starks was installed.

    This roster? A lot of new vets and unproven talent which makes getting to that critcal mass of core high performers a question mark.
     
  11. Half Empty

    Half Empty Cheesehead

    Messages:
    3,449
    Likes Received:
    197
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2014
    Packer Fan Since:
    1958
    Apparently a situation of two people looking at the same thing and seeing it differently.

    Did look at the link. Agree that there were a number of significant players who were injured. Hence, my (2) and (3) comments.

    Agree that 'next man up' most likely wouldn't work this year, because we don't have the (2) and (3) types of players.

    Biggest disconnect is that I wasn't considering this year when making my comments. I was just reiterating my viewpoint on 2010 injuries.
     
  12. AKCheese

    AKCheese Cheesehead

    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    44
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2014
    Packer Fan Since:
    1960
    It’s a QB (and coach’s) league. We’ve supposedly had the QB with one title/appearance to show for it. If we leave the Favre/Rodgers era without another title it will represent by far the biggest squandering of QB talent in NFL history. Thank god (was it Philly?) missed a short FG so we could even back into the playoffs in 2010. I don’t want to hear about injuries or new systems, youngest roster blah blah blah. In the Army we had a saying. Maximum effective range of an excuse is ZERO meters. Anything other than an NFC North title this year will represent FAILURE.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Messages:
    12,486
    Likes Received:
    867
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Packer Fan Since:
    1959
    None of your (1), (2) and (3) accounted for the number and quality of core players at their peak performance who were not injured.
     
  14. OldSchool101

    OldSchool101 Peerless Beer, Lacrosse WI

    Messages:
    3,589
    Likes Received:
    425
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Packer Fan Since:
    1973
    So that means the 2010 season is deemed a failure? We were a 6th seed and Chicago won our Division. I don’t think you meant that, but lots of ways to have success.

    If we get into the playoffs in any format at 10-6 or
    11-5 etc.. and win at least one playoff game I’d consider that a success. Anything past that (such as making the Championship game or SB) would be considered a huge success for a 1st year coach.
     
  15. captainWIMM

    captainWIMM Cheesehead

    Messages:
    22,281
    Likes Received:
    1,122
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Packer Fan Since:
    1995
    Well, the impressive thing about the 2010 team was that Thompson had put together a roster with a ton of quality depth capable of making up for several key injuries.
     

Share This Page

-->