Right...because using the word "turnover" that describes how much of the roster actually "changed" as "change" is ridiculous.
Let's go over the timeline here. First you tried to say Ted didn't like change. Then you were given examples of how wrong that was. Then you changed your story to say that Rodgers replacing Favre didn't really count as "change" because Rodgers' was "his guy" (as opposed to any other draft pick or FA that a GM finds, apparently, who aren't "their guy").
Then you tried to say that given stats saying that 20% of the roster turned over every year were "way off"...then you were provided a link showing how the turnover rate was actually even higher than that. So at that point you tried to change your story again and say that you really meant other team's FA's brought in as change.
You tried to make a point, and you were showed to be wrong, then when you continued, you were given a link to show why you were wrong.
YOU'RE wrong. Suck it up and deal with it instead of trying to backtrack every time one of your points goes up in smoke.