Another reason I love what the Ravens do. They disguise where the pressure is coming so well and confuse the blocking assignments. For example, they'll bring 6 up to the line which causes the blocking assignments to adjust, drop two out, and bring a blitz with someone you weren't expecting. It's so well designed and disguised and they'll give the same looks and change it up. It's like the Shanahan scheme for defense lol.
I don't know if we have the personal to purely rush four and leave 6 in coverage. It's kind of what we've been doing. Our secondary and inside linebackers aren't good enough.
I was thinking about this today.
I could be totally wrong, but I think that our personnel is closer to the "rush 4" model than a high blitz approach. I say that because disguise tends to depend a lot on guys who are viable both rushing and dropping. The Ravens have pieces like that-- I am thinking specifically of Queen, Smith, Hamilton, and Van Noy.
The only guy that seems to me to fit that mold for GB is Walker. The rest of the guys on the defensive front are guys who I would never trust to drop for the sake of disguise. Plus, they have invested a ton in a front that, maybe with a better approach, should be able to get pressure without blitzing, which is what every defense ought to strive for:
Gary was a 1st round pick and got paid
Smith is on a lucrative veteran contract
Clark was a 1st rounder and got paid
Wyatt was a 1st round pick
Van Ness was a 1st round pick
Brooks and Wooden were lower investments but have flashed
That doesn't mean you rule out a higher pressure DC. I would be refreshed to watch that kind of defense. But I don't know that I would say it fits the current personnel best.
What might be the best option, if we are going to split the difference here, is a DC who understands how to coach up DL games and stunts in a way that's less predictable than GB has been under Barry.