PackerTraxx
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2005
- Messages
- 1,028
- Reaction score
- 0
It appears the defense was much better prepared and played a much better game than the offense, especially considering the personell on each. Kudos to Bates.
digsthepack said:He may get yet another chance to take over mid-season if MS keeps this **** up!
Are he and TR lovers or something?
SlickVision said:digsthepack said:He may get yet another chance to take over mid-season if MS keeps this **** up!
Are he and TR lovers or something?
Lets make a prediction ... week 13 bates will be interim hc
SlickVision said:I stand by my comment saying the contract was a good thing. Now I am not saying him fullfilling those two years is a good thing and I didn't say that before.
Packman4Favre said:No question Bates did the most with the least and Sherman did the least with the most.
I would have been really upbeat about the defense if the offense did not stink up the place so bad.
I feel really good how Bates has these guy's playing considering their very average athletic ability.
Sherman continues to fail in the area of quality control, (the little things) where his teams regularly fail.
Considering the entire picture, this is the worst the Packers have looked since the mid 80's I feel a long season unless # 4 can bail Sherman out again.
brewcrew1702 said:What I was most disappointed in from the coaching staff was the play calling. There were numerous 3rd and shorts where they would call a pass play which obviously wasn't working. Green was running the ball well and yet they only gave him around 15 touches. Then there were 3rd and longs and we would be doing screen plays. The play calling in my mind was awful.
digsthepack said:DePack...you know my longstanding position on Sherman...much to like, but his faults are killers. He killed us yesterday. Completely unprepared to compete offensively..let's not even get into Ahman getting the ball only 15-16 times on what has been modeled into a power running team!