L
Lunchboxer
Guest
Rodgers led the packers to the Super Bowl in less time than Old #4.
Favre started in 1992 we did not get to the Super Bowl till 96-97 season.
Favre started in 1992 we did not get to the Super Bowl till 96-97 season.
Rodgers led the packers to the Super Bowl in less time than Old #4.
Favre started in 1992 we did not get to the Super Bowl till 96-97 season.
its hard to compare the two properly. they played on different packers teams against different opponents. it would be one thing if you were comparing them like the eagles can compare kevin kolb and michael vick
Anyone who is not happy with the Brett divorce is insane. Favre would still be with the Packers if we didn't finally cut him loose. Safe to say I'd doubt we'd be getting ready for the Super Bowl in that case.Well said...
I for one am tired of this Brett talk to be honest...Yeah its fun but he doesnt matter for this game coming up
I see on some sites the hatred for Ted STILL to this day from some and its just stupid.
Almost 4 years now
Favre, last NFC Championship game as a Packer.
35 att 19 comp 236 yards 2 tds 2 ints 70.7 rating.
Rodgers first NFC Championship game as a Packer
30 att 17 comp 244 yards 0 tds 2 ints 55.3 rating.
Just saying. Where's the difference?
You all need to move on from Favre.
I agree about the int being counted in the ratings..
But at what point to you make a cut off? Yeah Drivers was his fault,
but in GENERAL for ALL q/b, some have been tipped that were so far out of reach that it was the q/b fault for throwing the pass..
So how does someone determine what is the q/b fault or not
Another difference is that one is a drug addict who was probably stoned while playing.
(How else can you explain all the game losing INTs?)
The other is not.