Believes it’s a one year deal but structured a way that easy to move on this year
Andrew Brandt
- Thread starter longtimefan
- Start date
OP
OP
He was on 97.3 the game here in Milwaukee. Talked for 20 mins?
AKCheese
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2014
- Messages
- 2,326
- Reaction score
- 733
What is?
OP
OP
Drew & KB - Andrew Brandt (Former Packers Executive) - Drew & KB | iHeart
Andrew Brandt (Former Packers Executive) joined the show to discuss the state of the Packers, the Rodgers contract and transition, and more!
www.iheart.com
Andrew Brandt (Former Packers Executive) joined the show to discuss the state of the Packers, the Rodgers contract and transition, and more!
www.iheart.com
OP
OP
He thought they would separate this year with a trade
He hasn’t looked at contract in a while but recalls it isn’t 3 year deal or a 2 year deal it is basically a year deal for 42 mill ( which a ton of experts said at the time )
Dead money goes up rather than down the longer he plays which he said is odd
He hasn’t looked at contract in a while but recalls it isn’t 3 year deal or a 2 year deal it is basically a year deal for 42 mill ( which a ton of experts said at the time )
Dead money goes up rather than down the longer he plays which he said is odd
D
Deleted member 6794
Guest
The only way Rodgers' deal ends up being a one-year contract is if he retires after this season. Otherwise his option bonus and base salary for a total of close to $60 million for the 2023 season are fully guaranteed.
The Packers can move on from Rodgers by trading him after this season with a total of $40.3 million of dead money counting against their cap in either 2023 or the next two seasons. But they would need to find another team willing to give up massive draft compensation on top of them paying him $60 million next year.
The Packers can move on from Rodgers by trading him after this season with a total of $40.3 million of dead money counting against their cap in either 2023 or the next two seasons. But they would need to find another team willing to give up massive draft compensation on top of them paying him $60 million next year.
OP
OP
Spanky
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 623
- Reaction score
- 392
What is a one year deal? Was this thread broken out from another one that was already in progress? There is no context.
OP
OP
OP
OP
@SpankyDrew & KB - Andrew Brandt (Former Packers Executive) - Drew & KB | iHeart
Andrew Brandt (Former Packers Executive) joined the show to discuss the state of the Packers, the Rodgers contract and transition, and more!
www.iheart.com
OP
OP
Yup
He was right.
He was right.
OP
OP
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
OP
OP
Knew they would trade but didn't tell rodgers
Spanky
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 623
- Reaction score
- 392
Every time I hear Andrew Brandt talk, it sounds like he's constipated.
That's all I got...
That's all I got...
I tend to think BOTH sides knew and it is working like they thought it would. It forced BOTH sides to seriously consider their commitment to one another each year. Placing the payment where they did forced both sides to address the issue again. Rodgers and Team BOTH had to commit and restructure that deal to continue this year or it put enough of it out the team could be done after 1 year and have some hurt, like they should when you get rid of a player of that stature and contract it's just going to, but also kept a lot of it off their books if they moved on from him.
Even I could see it was a 1 year deal that was going to have to be looked at by both sides to continue going into this year and decided it was best to part ways. I think everyone involved knew a parting of the ways was a very real possibility when they re-upped the contract.
Even I could see it was a 1 year deal that was going to have to be looked at by both sides to continue going into this year and decided it was best to part ways. I think everyone involved knew a parting of the ways was a very real possibility when they re-upped the contract.
Guacamole
Full On Cheesehead
think think thinks, if if ifs, but but buts, thought thought thought, IMO IMO IMO, believes believes believes, ..if frogs had wings
If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we’d all have a merry Christmas.”
If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we’d all have a merry Christmas.”
Similar threads
Staff online
-
PikeBadgerModerator
