Playoff scenarios

JBlood

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
3,159
Reaction score
467
From acmepackingcompany.com

0.) Both GB and CHI win out until the rematch. If GB wins the rematch, then we win the division: same record, split head-to-head, same division record, but GB will have the better conference record.


1.) GB and CHI lose one more each until the rematch, but GB wins the rematch. Then we win the division. The likely losses? Say GB loses at NE, CHI loses vs NE. Again, GB wins the conference record tie-breaker. Say GB loses to NE, CHI loses vs NYJ. Then the same applies. Say GB loses to NYG, CHI loses vs NE (so we both beat NYJ). Then we have the same conference record, but GB wins strength of victory tie-breaker since GB would have beaten SF and NE, while CHI would have only beaten CAR and MIA. Finally, say GB loses to NYG, CHI loses to NYJ. Then we win the division based on strength of victory via the win over the Jets.


2.) GB and CHI lose two more each until the rematch, but GB wins the rematch. Again, the likely losses are GB loses to NE and NYG, CHI loses to NE and NYJ. We still win the strength of victory tie-breaker via the win-percentage of NYJ over MIA and SF over CAR.


3.) If GB loses one less game than CHI before the rematch, then a win in the rematch decides the division winner straight up.




Option 1) most likely imo; but it is comforting that we own most of the tiebreakers over the Bares.
 

gatorpack

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 26, 2010
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
235
Location
Florida
From acmepackingcompany.com

0.) Both GB and CHI win out until the rematch. If GB wins the rematch, then we win the division: same record, split head-to-head, same division record, but GB will have the better conference record.


1.) GB and CHI lose one more each until the rematch, but GB wins the rematch. Then we win the division. The likely losses? Say GB loses at NE, CHI loses vs NE. Again, GB wins the conference record tie-breaker. Say GB loses to NE, CHI loses vs NYJ. Then the same applies. Say GB loses to NYG, CHI loses vs NE (so we both beat NYJ). Then we have the same conference record, but GB wins strength of victory tie-breaker since GB would have beaten SF and NE, while CHI would have only beaten CAR and MIA. Finally, say GB loses to NYG, CHI loses to NYJ. Then we win the division based on strength of victory via the win over the Jets.


2.) GB and CHI lose two more each until the rematch, but GB wins the rematch. Again, the likely losses are GB loses to NE and NYG, CHI loses to NE and NYJ. We still win the strength of victory tie-breaker via the win-percentage of NYJ over MIA and SF over CAR.


3.) If GB loses one less game than CHI before the rematch, then a win in the rematch decides the division winner straight up.




Option 1) most likely imo; but it is comforting that we own most of the tiebreakers over the Bares.
The most important game left other than the bears is this week vs the lions. If we lose to the lions we need the bears to lose to the vikes to keep us within 1 game in the divison record. Or have the bears lose one more time than us leading up to the game vs them.
 
OP
OP
JBlood

JBlood

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
3,159
Reaction score
467
"The most important game left other than the bears is this week vs the lions."

Yes, in the NFL each game carries 10 times the value of a major league baseball game. They're all important.
 

FrankRizzo

Cheesehead
Joined
May 2, 2010
Messages
5,858
Reaction score
771
Location
Dallas

YoKramer

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
319
Reaction score
29
Location
Charlotte, NC
I dunno I dont see the Saints taking that Division from the Falcons :dunno:


This is how I see it playing out

You must be logged in to see this image or video!
 

PackersRS

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
8,450
Reaction score
969
Location
Porto Alegre, Brazil
Here’s my prediction:
NFC
#1 seed. ATL 13-3 (W at CAR, W at SEA, L vs NO, W vs CAR)
#2 seed. GB 11-5 (W at DET, L at NE, W vs NYG, W vs CHI)
#3 seed. PHI 11-5 (W at DAL, L at NYG, W vs MN, W vs DAL)
#4 seed. SEA 8-8 (W at SF, L vs ATL, L at TB, W vs STL)
#5 seed. NO. 12-4 (W vs STL, L at BAL, W at ATL, W vs TB)
#6 seed. NYG 10-6 (L at MN, W vs PHI, L at GB, W vs WAS)

AFC
#1 seed. NE 14-2 (W at CHI, W vs GB, W vs BUF, W vs MIA)
#2 seed. PIT 13-3 (W vs CIN, W vs NYJ, W vs CAR, W at CLE)
#3 seed. KC 11-5 (L vs SD, W at STL, W vs TEN, W vs OAK)
#4 seed. JAX 10-6 (W vs OAK, L at IND, W vs WAS, W at HOU)
#5 seed. BAL 12-4 (W at HOU, W vs NO, W vs CLE, W vs CIN)
#6 seed. NYJ 11-5 (W vs MIA, L at PIT, L at CHI, W vs BUF)

Wildcard round:
NFC:
NYG at PHI: PHI
NO at SEA: NO

AFC:
NYJ at KC: NYJ
BAL at JAX: BAL

Division round:
NFC:
PHI at GB: GB
NO at ATL: NO

AFC:
NYJ at NE: NE
BAL at PIT: PIT

Conference Championship:
NO at GB: GB
PIT at NE: PIT

SB:
PIT vs GB: GB!!!!!
 

gbpack12_2_89

Bleeding Green and Gold
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
702
Reaction score
133
Location
Green Bay Wisconsin
Here’s my prediction:
NFC
#1 seed. ATL 13-3 (W at CAR, W at SEA, L vs NO, W vs CAR)
#2 seed. GB 11-5 (W at DET, L at NE, W vs NYG, W vs CHI)
#3 seed. PHI 11-5 (W at DAL, L at NYG, W vs MN, W vs DAL)
#4 seed. SEA 8-8 (W at SF, L vs ATL, L at TB, W vs STL)
#5 seed. NO. 12-4 (W vs STL, L at BAL, W at ATL, W vs TB)
#6 seed. NYG 10-6 (L at MN, W vs PHI, L at GB, W vs WAS)

AFC
#1 seed. NE 14-2 (W at CHI, W vs GB, W vs BUF, W vs MIA)
#2 seed. PIT 13-3 (W vs CIN, W vs NYJ, W vs CAR, W at CLE)
#3 seed. KC 11-5 (L vs SD, W at STL, W vs TEN, W vs OAK)
#4 seed. JAX 10-6 (W vs OAK, L at IND, W vs WAS, W at HOU)
#5 seed. BAL 12-4 (W at HOU, W vs NO, W vs CLE, W vs CIN)
#6 seed. NYJ 11-5 (W vs MIA, L at PIT, L at CHI, W vs BUF)

Wildcard round:
NFC:
NYG at PHI: PHI
NO at SEA: NO

AFC:
NYJ at KC: NYJ
BAL at JAX: BAL

Division round:
NFC:
PHI at GB: GB
NO at ATL: NO

AFC:
NYJ at NE: NE
BAL at PIT: PIT

Conference Championship:
NO at GB: GB
PIT at NE: PIT

SB:
PIT vs GB: GB!!!!!

I like you style!!:clapping:
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Top