Packers vs Seattle Week 2

[ivo610]

So does Kam Chancellor play?

 

[longtimefan]

He is a dork..

3 years left on current and wants a new deal..Seattle shouldnt do anything, and show players not to pull that crap

 

[Croak]

Already? Sheesh. The Chicago game isn't quite over. LOL!

 

[I asked LT to delete my acct]

He is a dork..

3 years left on current and wants a new deal..Seattle shouldnt do anything, and show players not to pull that crap

They did miss him today for sure.

 

[Gutpunch77]

Our defense needs to improve

 

[thepackers1fan4]

we are going to get KILLED by Lynch unless something changes quick.

 

[ivo610]

Already? Sheesh. The Chicago game isn't quite over. LOL!

You missed the dagger when clay got the int? Hmm

 

[ivo610]

we are going to get KILLED by Lynch unless something changes quick.

Thankfully big yardage doesn't always translate to a win

 

[ivo610]

He is a dork..

3 years left on current and wants a new deal..Seattle shouldnt do anything, and show players not to pull that crap

They start 0-2 and they might want to consider it

 

[okcpackerfan]

calling it now 27-21 Packers win vs Seahawks

 

[longtimefan]

we are going to get KILLED by Lynch unless something changes quick.

Did Forte kill us in your opinion?

 

[Half Empty]

Well, 24/141 rushing and 5/25 receiving is a pretty good imitation. If they use him on that 2nd-and-goal at the 2, might have actually committed the homicide.

 

[Vrill]

we are going to get KILLED by Lynch unless something changes quick.

LOL, Forte tore us up last year too and we still won. Nothing new there.

 

[Raptorman]

The question is this. Do believe Wilson/Lynch is better than Cutler/Forte? And is Seattle Defense, even without Chancellor better than the Bears?

 

[HardRightEdge]

So does Kam Chancellor play?

I don't know about that. What I do know is Seattle has only $1 mil in free cap space.

Anyhow, Seattle started 3 - 3 last season, losing to St. Lou on the road in week 6. Bobby Wagner missed the first 5 games, with what you'd reckon at least one game back to find his sea legs.

Seattle gave Wagner a 4 year, $41 million extension which kicks in next season. He's the straw that stirs the drink.

Chancellor is a fine player who has played very well against the Packers. Somehow I'm more concerned the 'Hawks will have their blood up after that St. Louis loss.

The Packers will need to bring their A game. It's good to be playing at home.

 

[Krisco65]

I think we have a good chance against Seattle this year. Not only are we at home now but we have somthing to prove from last years NFC Championship game..

 

[yooperpackfan]

Seattle is going to come into Green Bay madder than fall hornets.
I don't think playing on the hallowed ground of Lambeau is going to make our defense suddenly better.
I chalk this one up as one of our 4 losses on the season.

 

[Packer Fan in SD]

Chancellor is a monster and not having him will be important. Added to that they lost a very good center in the Graham trade and have lost a few pieces lately. I do think Wilson and Lynch are better than Cutler and Forte, but until the end Cutler played like he had a clue.

I don't think it will be easy to beat Seattle, but I do think our defense will play better at home and we will start to get those frontline defensive players back. I see a great chance to go 2-0, but we will have to play near errorless football. GPG!

 

[rodell330]

Did Forte kill us in your opinion?

Yes, yes he did . Seattle is a wayy better team than Chicago and will best us AGAIN unless this sorry defense learns to tackle and stop people.

 

[Krisco65]

Chancellor is a monster and not having him will be important. Added to that they lost a very good center in the Graham trade and have lost a few pieces lately. I do think Wilson and Lynch are better than Cutler and Forte, but until the end Cutler played like he had a clue.

I don't think it will be easy to beat Seattle, but I do think our defense will play better at home and we will start to get those frontline defensive players back. I see a great chance to go 2-0, but we will have to play near errorless football. GPG!

Sorry but I have to disagree. While being at home is always better, its still the same players and the same Dom Capers. Lynch is going to run all over us because we cant do anything against the run. Forte ran for 141 yds and a TD. Lynch is more of a beast than him so there's no reason to think he wont at least do the same. We just hope we can do better on offense and outscore them because they are going to score a lot on us.

 

[JBlood]

Bears were 11/17 on 3rd downs and 2/3 on 4th down conversions. If you can't get off the field you're going to have trouble beating good teams. Our defense kept the Bears in the game until they Cutlered. We'll have to be better next week, and the rest of the season.

 

[Packer Fan in SD]

Sorry but I have to disagree. While being at home is always better, its still the same players and the same Dom Capers. Lynch is going to run all over us because we cant do anything against the run. Forte ran for 141 yds and a TD. Lynch is more of a beast than him so there's no reason to think he wont at least do the same. We just hope we can do better on offense and outscore them because they are going to score a lot on us.

No problem with you disagreeing. I do think offensively we will play much better at home, I think last year we were fairly close to doubling our offensive output. It was 39.8 at home vs 21.0. Defensively we gave up 20.4 at home and 26 on the road. Now obviously that doesn't show who we played on the road vs at home, and having joined (at least in spirit) some of our overseas Packer lovers in the indulgence of liquid libations during and after the game, I am not confident to post links with my iPad, at least I am not confident those links would not reference "The Devil and Ms. Jones" videos and pictures. But off google those are the numbers I found, so yeah, for whatever reasons, we score more and give up less at home. That's MY story, and I am sticking with it. And I don't know how to make a smiling face on my iPad here. So...

And apparently I do know how to make a smiling face.

 

[Krisco65]

No problem with you disagreeing. I do think offensively we will play much better at home, I think last year we were fairly close to doubling our offensive output. It was 39.8 at home vs 21.0. Defensively we gave up 20.4 at home and 26 on the road. Now obviously that doesn't show who we played on the road vs at home, and having joined (at least in spirit) some of our overseas Packer lovers in the indulgence of liquid libations during and after the game, I am not confident to post links with my iPad, at least I am not confident those links would not reference "The Devil and Ms. Jones" videos and pictures. But off google those are the numbers I found, so yeah, for whatever reasons, we score more and give up less at home. That's MY story, and I am sticking with it. And I don't know how to make a smiling face on my iPad here. So...

And apparently I do know how to make a smiling face.

Lmao. Your sense of humor is very similar to mine. Do you have twitter?

 

[Packer Fan in SD]

Lmao. Your sense of humor is very similar to mine. Do you have twitter?

No, but my wife does call me a twit, does that count?

 

[Packer Fan in SD]

Lmao. Your sense of humor is very similar to mine. Do you have twitter?

Not sure where you come from, but I grew up with a product called "Crisco" that my mother used for baking, I think. I found other uses for it, but that is neither here nor there. So, a like for the name and the mammories it brings me. Oops. Spellcheck at work, methinks.