- May 12, 2014
- Reaction score
If Rodgers won't budge; does he have a no trade clause? Can he veto a trade?
Assuming they can't work things out with Rodgers, which I'm not ready to rule out yet:He is likely to be traded after June 1st I bet Green Bay is thinking if they can get as much salary cap and weapons for a qb on a rookie salary and he turns out they have a window there.
. Every year are new challenges as far as position needs.Love isn't less valuable as quarterbacks coming out of college but the difference being that NFL teams already decided he wasn't worth of being selected in the top 25 last year.
That makes sense.Just to be clear, I don't consider Love being in the Packers' system for a year not as a negative at all. I just don't agree with several posters around here that other teams, which passed on drafting him in last year's draft, would now line up to trade for him while giving up a first rounder in return.
Yes he could. But I believe he would owe GB a lot of money. And that would just be the money he has already taken. There might also be breach of contract and how it has affected revenues for the GBP. Could be much more money than just what he actually owes. imoSomeone around here said no. But he could always "retire" until he gets his way.
Yes he could. But I believe he would owe GB a lot of money. And that would just be the money he has already taken. There might also be breach of contract and how it has affected revenues for the GBP. Could be much more money than just what he actually owes. imo
There is no players contract that has a "no cut" clause.No way...no player has ever been sued for I guess your saying loss of future projected earnings. And that trend won't start with Rodgers. By that logic players could sue teams for cutting them before the end of their contracts
Also I highly doubt they would ask him to repay bonus money. As they would probably want to hold out hope of a reconciliation, like with Favre, at some point...