Has nothing to do with what I posted now does it? Unless you want to harp on how Matt Flynn averaged more per game for Green Bay than Aaron Rodgers did. It kind of destroys your point if you take Aarpn Rodgers out and out Matt Flynn in and Matt Flynn has a better game than Aaron Rodgers ever had with the same players on offense. So much for your MVP argument.
Quote statistics all you want but it still doesn't mask the fact that Eli Manning is the better and more successful QB.
It kind of is clear as day so just grow up and admit it.
Eli Manning is the better QB and he owns your stadium in the postaeason.
Our QB is already a legend that has more than secured his place in Canton. Your QB is a statistic machine that is little more than an afterthough.
I bELIeve.
It's really not "my" MVP argument. It's more of Peter Kings, the AP, ea sports, MVP voters, PFF, Prisco, nfl players, ect
It's not me that needs to defend my QB. He is consistently ranked as the best QB in the nfl. I rarely if ever see him ranked any lower than 1st. It's eli who the players ranked 31st. It's Eli who prisco rated 15th. It's Eli who was ranked 8th by PFF. I'd be insecure too if I heard all that about my QB. It's ok, the first step is admitting Rodgers is the best QB you have ever seen.
As far as the Flynn thing, our back up played well, but if you think that in anyway discredits Rodgers having the greatest season ever you don't truly understand football. (which is pretty clear at this point that you don't)
I'm half awake and destroying everything you post. It's too easy son.