I certainly hope TT can do better than a much slower, 34 yr. old (next month b-day) former Packer. Pass...
Why waste a roster spot on an old player you didn't want 3 years ago. The Browns are not awash in superior talent and he couldn't hang on there.
might as well get Woodson back while we're at it. Wonder how we would have ended up if we hung onto Heyward....
The annual posts to sign a known name player.. No matter how horrible he looked last year
Fixed your response to fit my line of thinking. We desperately need CB's but Tramon, IMHO, offers us very little....if you brought him in on a 1 year deal to help bridge the gap for some of the youngercornersOLB to improve and provide depth as well, and couple that with an early round pick atcornerOLB I think collectively we might be in much better shape than we were this year.
If you're looking for a big FA splash signing at corner, I think you'll be disappointed.
I somewhat understand what you are saying but you were already given the only reason you need, he was cut by the browns...Because our entire secondary didn't look horrible last year, to the point where Tramon would probably be a low priced upgrade over the production we have if used properly?
Seriously, corner was by far our weak link last year, he'll be cheap and in TTs price range, he won't require a long-term deal, he wouldn't count against the comp pick formula, he left on good terms, and he already knows the system.
Those are a ton of reasons that it makes sense beyond 'knowing his name. ' If you'd like to point out reasons it doesn't by all means disagree with it, but there's no reason to mock a perfectly reasonable and inexpensive suggested veteran add at a position of terrible weakness which lacks any veterans. It's not like I am suggesting adding Ryan Fitzpatrick here. Obviously I'd love to add Malcolm Butler and AJ Bouye but I'm trying to be realistic about who Thompson may kick the tires on.
Fixed your response to fit my line of thinking. We desperately need CB's but Tramon, IMHO, offers us very little.
I definitely think a vet OLB needs to be brought in on a reasonable 1 or 2 yr deal to bridge the gap. Don't think TT will pay what Perry will get, and the savings of $11.1Mil on the cap by cutting CM3 would help strengthen other positions. Don't want to derail this thread, just liked your idea but at a different position.
It is finally time for Thompson to stop shopping for bargains and address the cornerback and outside linebacker positions with veterans in their prime. Tramon Williams isn´t the solution to the Packers woes in the secondary.
I like it, fixing the pass rush might be the beat way to start fixing the secondary.
Ideally yes, but I don't think it will happen. We enter every offseason waiting to see if Thompson will change his stripes, why would he change now?
I somewhat understand what you are saying but you were already given the only reason you need, he was cut by the browns...
There is no reason to bring him back
I've already stated my opinion on this, but I'm tagging on again. Our pass rush must get better or any money spent on the back end of the defense will be largely wasted.I like it, fixing the pass rush might be the beat way to start fixing the secondary. I think Perry will be retained though .
I've already stated my opinion on this, but I'm tagging on again. Our pass rush must get better or any money spent on the back end of the defense will be largely wasted.