Team Changes for Next Season

DoURant

Go Pack Go!
Joined
Mar 25, 2017
Messages
2,928
Reaction score
2,405
Location
Michigan
Shouldn't it be about time the Packers dedicated their WR #6 position to be a kick returner. This past season the Packers averaged only 5.6 yards per punt return on only 26 returns in 17 regular season games.

If they went out and drafted a proven punt returner or got one via a trade or free agency, the value would be tangible. For example, if they finally had somebody who could average ablut 10 yards per punt return, they could realistically also take fewer fair catches. Instead of fielding 1.5 punts at 5.6 yards per return, a good returner could field 2 punts per game and give you 20 return yards (2×10 ypr).

That would be close to 12 yards of additional field position per game or two additional drives per game that start 6 yards closer to the end zone increasing the chances of a successful scoring drive.

Does a WR #6 who bounces between the roster and the practice squad give those higher scoring odds n 2 drives per game? Very doubtful.

Finding a good punt returner isn't easy, but spending the staff time and draft resources sure seems to be worth the effort when you compare the impact of a typical WR #6 with a good punt returner.
We did sign Micole Hardman as a FA last year, I would think it was in hopes he could be that returner for us. However, he was cut after the last Preseason game. He also turned the ball over on a punt return attempt, I believe in the last preseason game.
 

gopkrs

Cheesehead
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
7,783
Reaction score
2,744
We did sign Micole Hardman as a FA last year, I would think it was in hopes he could be that returner for us. However, he was cut after the last Preseason game. He also turned the ball over on a punt return attempt, I believe in the last preseason game.
That's really not the same as having that last receiver as the returner. We hoped, but he was really there as a receiver.
 

mradtke66

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
2,113
Reaction score
854
Location
Madison, WI
...would that not be worth rostering instead?
I'd like to have this guy. We just haven't found him, at least not since Nixon got too valuable on defense.

Now we're down the rabbit hole of have we not found him vs. have we not looked for him vs. whatever roster construction issue lead us here vs. is being a better returner a coachable skill or an innate ability.
 

DoURant

Go Pack Go!
Joined
Mar 25, 2017
Messages
2,928
Reaction score
2,405
Location
Michigan
That's really not the same as having that last receiver as the returner. We hoped, but he was really there as a receiver.
Not sure about that, since we drafted 2 guys, one in the 1st rd, plus we had Watson. Reed, Doubs, and Wicks already on the roster. Heath beat him out for the 6th spot, with Watson starting on on IR
 

gopkrs

Cheesehead
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
7,783
Reaction score
2,744
Not sure about that, since we drafted 2 guys, one in the 1st rd, plus we had Watson. Reed, Doubs, and Wicks already on the roster. Heath beat him out for the 6th spot, with Watson starting on on IR
Then another reason not to keep Biachi. He cannot pick out key special team pkayers. He has to luck into them
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
21,066
Reaction score
10,834
I think the Packers need to draft a center but handing a starting job to a rookie if you let Ryhan walk could be a disaster.
Well sure asking any Rookie is a risk.
Now that said, Both Corey Linsley and Josh Myers started in their Rookie seasons and neither looked back.

As with most players nothing is guaranteed, that said if we’re going to go Center imo we’d need to strongly consider a Day2 prospect that played against Power 5 level competition and that’s ranked in that Top 75-100 overall type feel. Call it best 2-3 Centers at the collegiate level. Parker Brailsford is an intriguing prospect from Alabama


I am a little surprised Monk hasn’t come along better. He had 5 years of college Center experience and at 2nd team ACC conference level
 
Last edited:

Heyjoe4

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 30, 2018
Messages
10,824
Reaction score
4,509
He is a FA so just like Walker we cannot really know if he is going to be here or not.
Thanks for clarifying. Could be a case similar to Slaton's, where the Packers just aren't willing to pay a lot of money for inconsistent or one-dimensional production. It may end up being inexpensive to keep him. Hard to say what will happen in FA.

Gluten tried and faltered with Banks last year. Maybe find a C later in the draft. However they do it, Love deserves to have a steady C who will work with him for years.
 
Last edited:

Heyjoe4

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 30, 2018
Messages
10,824
Reaction score
4,509
I was a bit mistaken as Stenavich did reportedly interview (or is going to) for the Tennessee OC position.

Last year Matt allowed him to interview for multiple lateral moves as well (Houston, Seattle)

I don't know what the incentive is for Matt (other than just doing the guy a solid, I guess) but for Stenavich I have to think that taking an OC job elsewhere is a "promotion," practically speaking (if not in name/title). Kind of feels like he is essentially a glorified offensive assistant for us.
Spot on. Stevanich is a glorified offensive assistant, and I'm not sure what he contributes.

I'd like the Packers to hire a true assistant for MLF. Probably a current offensive assistant elsewhere - and add some new things to the playbook, and help with clock management, a true weakness for MLF.

Stevanich seems better served as an assitant, coaching the OL. I don't think anyone is giving him serious consideration as an OC, much less a HC, anywhere else. Hell the Eagles just hired 33 y/o Packer offensive assistant Sean Mannion as their new OC. How do we lose guys like this? Or was he not worth promoting from within.

At any rate an OC at GB is like a third wheel on a date. Pretty useless. I'd like to think Gannon can help MLF manage some things, but he's a former DC himself.
 

Sanguine camper

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
2,928
Reaction score
1,365
I'd like to have this guy. We just haven't found him, at least not since Nixon got too valuable on defense.

Now we're down the rabbit hole of have we not found him vs. have we not looked for him vs. whatever roster construction issue lead us here vs. is being a better returner a coachable skill or an innate ability.
I really don't think the Packers have used a late round draft picks on a guy who excels at returning kicks but is questionable at the WR position. It looks very much like they just farm it out to who's ever available. That philosophy isn't working and is a big reason the special teams suck every year.

Another hidden but huge impact of a really good punt returner is that you will likely have some coaches taking more chances on 4th down, rather than risking a big punt return.

Make a stop on a 4th down and instead of a 10 yard punt return, you have a 40 yard change in field position. That's like recovering a fumble.
 

Heyjoe4

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 30, 2018
Messages
10,824
Reaction score
4,509
I really don't think the Packers have used a late round draft picks on a guy who excels at returning kicks but is questionable at the WR position. It looks very much like they just farm it out to who's ever available. That philosophy isn't working and is a big reason the special teams suck every year.

Another hidden but huge impact of a really good punt returner is that you will likely have some coaches taking more chances on 4th down, rather than risking a big punt return.

Make a stop on a 4th down and instead of a 10 yard punt return, you have a 40 yard change in field position. That's like recovering a fumble.
I don’t remember the last time the Packers had elite KRs and PRs.
 

Heyjoe4

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 30, 2018
Messages
10,824
Reaction score
4,509
Im going DL double dip. Then iOL maybe, higher end center. Then drop CB later due to Diggs. Im a believer if good things happen on the DL the CBs look better. Plus gotta see FA play out.. it will change things.
Diggs is gone. I agree with comments that the OL needs to be stabilized. I see Morgan at LT, Belton at RG and Tom (hope he overcomes the patella injury) at RT. Still need starters at LG and C.

With pressing needs at corner and iDL, there’s a lot to do for Gluten.
 

McKnowledge

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 29, 2015
Messages
1,483
Reaction score
375
I think O-Line starting five needs to be defined during training camp.

The same needs to happen for WRs.

A clear hierarchy is absolutely necessary for every position group.

However, the biggest change I want to see is MLF developing into a true leader, and establishing a true standard that he won't even break.

It's time to give up play calling.

I would love to see him hire an OC from outside the organization, someone with a fresh
objective perspective.
 

gopkrs

Cheesehead
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
7,783
Reaction score
2,744
I don't know if Allen Rossum was elite, but he's better than what the Packers have tried in the past 8-10 years. He played on the Mike Sherman teams and had some big returns.
Desmond Howard may be the last elite returner.
I'd take a Rossum any day. And he could play DB in a pinch. Not that I'd need him to be multifaceted in that way
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
21,066
Reaction score
10,834
I don't know if Allen Rossum was elite, but he's better than what the Packers have tried in the past 8-10 years. He played on the Mike Sherman teams and had some big returns.
Desmond Howard may be the last elite returner.
Yeah.
Randall Cobb was our last “good” Punt Returner. He was a ~10 yard per guy across a large sample. Hardman was comparable to Cobb, but his days were numbered after we drafted a pair of top 100 selections at WR in an already thick group.
Keisean Nixon was an obvious Premier KR.

I think the Packers found their KR. Savion Williams looked really solid and it was instantaneously. What I like about him is he’s nearly smaller TE sized but quick. He doesn’t look fragile anyway.

That leaves PR. Personally I’m looking for one of the top Special Teams players in the Draft that has a proven track record at PR and using one of our 7th Rounders there.

I’d have my attention on Kaden Wetjen
Ranked
# 9 in KR
#1 in PR


You must be logged in to see this image or video!
 
Last edited:

shockerx

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
462
Reaction score
254
Yeah.
Randall Cobb was our last “good” Punt Returner. He was a ~10 yard per guy across a large sample. Hardman was comparable to Cobb, but his days were numbered after we drafted a pair of top 100 selections at WR in an already thick group.
Keisean Nixon was an obvious Premier KR.

I think the Packers found their KR. Savion Williams looked really solid and it was instantaneously. What I like about him is he’s nearly smaller TE sized but quick. He doesn’t look fragile anyway.

That leaves PR. Personally I’m looking for one of the top Special Teams players in the Draft that has a proven track record at PR and using one of our 7th Rounders there.

I’d have my attention on Kaden Wetjen
Ranked
# 9 in KR
#1 in PR


You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Lets just draft all IOWA guys ...Center, Guard , PR and and whoever else..we kinda do it with Georgia so maybe hit a sleeper LOL.
 

Sanguine camper

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
2,928
Reaction score
1,365
Yeah.
Randall Cobb was our last “good” Punt Returner. He was a ~10 yard per guy across a large sample. Hardman was comparable to Cobb, but his days were numbered after we drafted a pair of top 100 selections at WR in an already thick group.
Keisean Nixon was an obvious Premier KR.

I think the Packers found their KR. Savion Williams looked really solid and it was instantaneously. What I like about him is he’s nearly smaller TE sized but quick. He doesn’t look fragile anyway.

That leaves PR. Personally I’m looking for one of the top Special Teams players in the Draft that has a proven track record at PR and using one of our 7th Rounders there.

I’d have my attention on Kaden Wetjen
Ranked
# 9 in KR
#1 in PR


You must be logged in to see this image or video!
I agree adding Wetjen would be a good move if they can get him as a 6th or 7th round draft pick or UDFA.

When was the last time the Packers had a very small player? Under 5 foot 10 and under 185 pounds? Most of the time, the good punt returners are small guys. I think it would be wise to relax the size thresholds for a punt returner.
 

gopkrs

Cheesehead
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
7,783
Reaction score
2,744
I agree adding Wetjen would be a good move if they can get him as a 6th or 7th round draft pick or UDFA.

When was the last time the Packers had a very small player? Under 5 foot 10 and under 185 pounds? Most of the time, the good punt returners are small guys. I think it would be wise to relax the size thresholds for a punt returner.
Relaxing thresholds for everything makes sense to me. I wouldn't mind an xlnt 5'9" corner for instance.
 

Half Empty

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 29, 2014
Messages
4,865
Reaction score
895
Relaxing thresholds for everything makes sense to me. I wouldn't mind an xlnt 5'9" corner for instance.
Don't really know, but, given the overall athletic ability of all those 6'2"+ receivers, wouldn't that just mean heaving a lot of jump balls at the midget?
 

milani

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
8,445
Reaction score
4,098
I agree adding Wetjen would be a good move if they can get him as a 6th or 7th round draft pick or UDFA.

When was the last time the Packers had a very small player? Under 5 foot 10 and under 185 pounds? Most of the time, the good punt returners are small guys. I think it would be wise to relax the size thresholds for a punt returner.
The last small punt returner may have been Willie Wood, who was all of 5'10", but could stuff a basketball.
 
Top