RB FA or not

[chibiabos]

:feedback: Whether GB gets a RB in FA or not, there will be a couple of good choices in the draft probably in rd. 2 . There is also a decent TE that could be available at 1st rd. 16. Think the Pack could make a decent draft choice at 16 and still get a good RB later. Thoughts?

 

[Mortfini]

Green bay r real good at using their draft picks even in low rounds so if we dont get any 1 in F.A it wont be bad

 

[agopackgo4]

If I could pick any way for the Pack to get a RB I would try to pull off a trade. But I am not sure how realistic that is to get a decent RB. Id say if there is a good RB available at our time, go for him!

 

[Danreb]

I can pretty much guarantee that the Pack will end up with Peterson, Lynch, Irons, or Bush. If they don't, they messed up with their draft planning.

I wouldn't mind bringing in Corey Dillon. He's old, but he's strong, and Morency can pick up with the speed he posesses.

 

[robkeg]

I would like to see GB bring in a good FA RB and then draft a RB in second round. I believe we need some experience in the back field to guide the young guys. There should still be some decent RB in second round.