Dantés
Gute Loot
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2017
- Messages
- 12,447
- Reaction score
- 3,373
Really disappointed Dallas Goedert isn't going to run a 40 at all.
Meh... I don't really care about the 40 when it comes to TE's.
Really disappointed Dallas Goedert isn't going to run a 40 at all.
Meh... I don't really care about the 40 when it comes to TE's.
Meh... I don't really care about the 40 when it comes to TE's.
Depends how they play imo.
In-line...eh. Slot, or move, I care a bit.
Goedert had a very good 3-cone and vert, so he's probably fine.
Goedert also had a faster short shuttle 4.06 than Gesicki 4.10Goedert had a very good 3-cone and vert, so he's probably fine.
Goedert also had a faster short shuttle 4.06 than Gesicki 4.10
Speaking of Dallas Goedert, I just looked at his pro day results. I was sad there wasn't a 40 time, but Holy Crap!
Dallas Goedert:
Height: 6'4.5"
Weight: 256lbs
Arms: 34"
Hands: 10"
Vertical: 35"
Broad Jump: 10'1"
3-cone: 6.87 seconds
Bench: 24 reps
To put this into prospective, here's Gronk and Kelce.
Gronk:
Height: 6'6"
Weight: 264lbs
Arms: 34 1/4"
Hands: 10 3/4"
Vertical: 33 1/2"
Broad Jump: 9'11"
3-cone: 7.18 seconds
Bench: 24 reps
Kelce:
Height: 6'5"
Weight: 255lbs
Arms: 33 3/4"
Hands: 9 5/8"
Vertical: 35"
Broad Jump: 10'4"
3-cone: 7.09 seconds
And for kicks, here's Zach Ertz:
Height: 6'5"
Weight: 249lbs
Arms: 31 3/4"
Hands: 9 3/4"
Vertical: 30.5"
Broad Jump: 9'3"
3-cone: 7.08 seconds
Bench: 24 reps
So looking at the numbers, Dallas has a better 3-cone time that any of the tight ends listed, by a lot! His vertical is better than Gronk and equal to Kelce, and blows Ertz away. He doesn't have T-Rex arms like Ertz and his broad jump is almost as explosive as Kelce. I'd really love to see the straight line speed, but the kid is a serious athlete at that size. I doubt he lands with us, but I'm still loving this kid as a prospect.
And then there's this guy for comparison sake.
Height: 6'-6"
Weight: 260lbs
Arms: 35"
Hands: 10 5/8"
Vertical: 38.5"
Broad Jump: 10'
3-cone: 6.90 seconds
Bench: Dnp injury
I'd say this guy has the best physical skill set of them all as he also ran the fastest 40 of the group at 4.56 seconds.
Jimmy Graham
That being said I like goedert but not before the end of the 4th round. I think there's gonna be better players available at positions of greater need and importance prior to that. Considering goedert will likely be long gone by the end of the 4th round. I prefer guys like Troy fumagali and or Christopher Herndon from Miami in the 5th round. Or another option would be to bundle some of those late picks and accumulate an additional 3rd or 4th rounder or both
Goedert isn't going to be there at pick #45, but if he is, I hope we pull the trigger. He's been my #1 2018 draft crush since before the 2017 draft. I saw highlights of him when I was looking at TE's for last years draft, and fell in love with this guy. I've been praying for this guy to be a Packer for over a year.One thing I know for sure, Goedert isn't going to be there past late second.
Fumagalli is the same guy as Richard Rodgers. A little better at blocking, but super meh.
If we took Goedert at 45, I'd be fine with that.
Jordan Mailata. 6'8" 348 lbs
Rugby player. Google him and watch him run with the ball. I can't imagine trying to tackle him. Not sure how I would use him. Defense is easier to learn. TE if he has any receiving skills.
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-video...off-his-footwork-during-international-pro-day
At 6'8" 350, he doesn't need to outrun anyone.He's trying to learn how to play offensive tackle. He ran a 5.12 so there's no way he can play te.
No way goedert at 45 you'd be passing up a much better player to take him. And Fumagali is a much better blocker than Rodgers. From what I recall Rodgers is big but he's a terrible blocker. I see fumagali as a lot like mark chumura, a possession security blanket. Currently a te that can play inline and block is missing on the roster
Depends how they play imo.
In-line...eh. Slot, or move, I care a bit.
Goedert had a very good 3-cone and vert, so he's probably fine.
Better than Rodgers at blocking? Yeah.
Much better? No.
He's not big, he's not fast, he's just a guy. There are quite a few TE's I'd rather take that can actually block.
Like Fumagali, Dalton shultz is an inline te who can supposedly block well.
Richard Rodgers played in college as a big wr who the Packers turned into a te he basically didn't block at all at Cal. He was and is definitely not a y
Check out Josh Norris and Evan Silva. A lot better. Of course Daniel Jeremiah has to be in there too...same with Lance Zierline.
Even guys like Matt Waldman, the guys from NDT Scouting, Justis Mosqueda...I think you would like them.