GreenBaySlacker
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2014
- Messages
- 3,847
- Reaction score
- 603
Nice kick . BWWahahahahahahaha
He’s handed them 30 yards tonight…without his stupidity it’s still a shut out I betHe frustrates the heck out if his opponent and frustrates the fans and frustrates the Refs!
Touching a Ref?! Unacceptable.
No excuses good enough for allowing them +15 and 1st downs. He has single handed let this drive continue.
Agree that was foolish. Letting time roll off the clock wasted at least three potential plays. With the cold weather, time is even more important because kicking distances for FG's decreases.Horrific clock management. You’ve got all 3 timeouts and you’re not going to burn one there to save 2 minutes for your drive?
Agreed, we're telling them that we want a FG.Agree that was foolish. Letting time roll off the clock wasted at least three potential plays. With the cold weather, time is even more important because kicking distances for FG's decreases.
You’re playing for 7-3. I’m playing for 14-3 or at least 10-3. If we’re concerned about the Bears going 80 yards in the 2 minute drill with a minute left and our defense than we have problems.You got 3 timeouts so do Bears. You dont get a 1st down then you want less time if you need to punt.
What was that….Agreed, we're telling them that we want a FG.
Nevermind, apparently the bears are going to leave a WR open.Agreed, we're telling them that we want a FG.
Yeah think it's kind of a six of one, half a dozen of the other type situation. Take your timeouts before 2 minute and you keep more time on the clock but no stoppages other than 2 min warning. Let it ride and you have less on the clock but are in control of clock for the rest of the way.There was only :25 runoff. So our timeouts are variable. 2-minute being fixed without our control. So our timeout is an advantage over a scheduled because we dictate it. It’s probably even Steven there imo.
About thatAgreed, we're telling them that we want a FG.

You’re playing for 7-3. I’m playing for 14-3 or at least 10-3.
Horrible coverage! I'm so happy I was wrong there!What was that….
That play call was looking for chunks if you look at it, just happened the biggest was the clearest open.Nevermind, apparently the bears are going to leave a WR open.
I have to agree with you, I can't believe that the coverage was that bad, but I'm loving that it was.That play call was looking for chunks if you look at it, just happened the biggest was the clearest open.