Green_Bay_Packers
Cheesehead
It might explain why its 1:40 over here in the morning and im still posting, i so happy we won that game.
Packers get an ugly win, so of course our Forum ****** decide to flare up again.Packers are "Paper Tigers"....
Beat up on some "tomato can" teams, but are really not that good...
It's funny to hear the "arrogance" of their fans though...haha
Yeah i'm hoping arizona plays minnesota so the queens get eliminated early. After that arizona vs green bay which i think packers win. The real test after that would be new orleans... In the dome.Looks like Green Bay will be playing at Philly or 'Zona - not an easy task. Imagine - Green Bay playing at Arizona week 17 and possibly the following Saturday or Sunday - that's pretty wild.
Of the three in terms of who Minnesota would play, I'd probably prefer Green Bay. Arizona matches up brilliantly against Minnesota and Philly is always tough on #4.
Shaping up to be a stupendous post-season.
Minnesota has a first round bye.Yeah i'm hoping arizona plays minnesota so the queens get eliminated early. After that arizona vs green bay which i think packers win. The real test after that would be new orleans... In the dome.
Minnesota has a first round bye.
The only way your scenario is possible is if Green Bay:
-plays and beats Arizona in round 1
-plays and beats New Orleans in round 2
-Minnesota is beaten by Dallas/New York or Philly in round 2
Packers get an ugly win, so of course our Forum ****** decide to flare up again.
You do remember when we beat Baltimore, right? Because that was last week. You do remember when we beat Dallas, right? Both are hardly "tomato can" teams, whatever the hell that means.
I smell an air of uneasiness in your posts. Something tells me that deep down you're a little scared that this Packer team might prove you wrong this January.
You're the forum syphilis....
Dementia has already set in...
Jeff is just mad that right now this Packer team is a WINNER as it is now 9-4 which is a winning record.
In fact this team is now will have a winning season
Sooooo, you have nothing to refute my arguements with?You're the forum syphilis....
Dementia has already set in...
The explanation is that the refs said he was falling down, and lost control.No word, but it doesnt matter it was definitely a touchdown. He had three feet in and ball control until he stepped out. Thats six all day!
Money quote.League is just covering their own.
The Pack is going to the playoffs IMO so we better get used to the calls, we're not going to be the home team.
Not with that attitude! Didn't you hear? Pack are winning out, and Queens are losing out, giving the division to the Pack Attack.
You guys crack me up.....
"Keep bending towards the ground and reachin' for those ankles"....
Jesus Christ. Can't you say anything without dragging some homosexual reference into it. Damm your annoying.
In my opinion he wasn't in the act of catching the pass, he had already caught it and wasn't going to the ground. After getting two feet down and maintaining possession he was knocked down by the defender.
I'd say the "act of catching the ball" is the time before the ball is securely in possession and both feet are down.
When Jennings went down he was past the "Act of Catching the Ball" IMO. Dude had already caught the damn thing, maintained possession, and gotten both feet down = Touchdown. Nothing that happened after that means anything. That is my opinion.
League is just covering their own.
Jennings' catch reminds me of the game winning TD that Brett threw in the San Franscisco game. The receiver caught it, had both feet in and then stepped out of bounds. If I remember correctly he bobbled it a little in his hand before he finally hit the ground. But you are right about the "Act of catching" part. I just hate how the vikings were able to steal a win off of it and we lost a clear cut TD.