Unomee
Cheesehead
How is it that the team has not yet clinched HFA? They do own tie breaker with the Saints and why would the 49er's get it assuming the pack were to lose it's final two games?
How is it that the team has not yet clinched HFA? They do own tie breaker with the Saints and why would the 49er's get it assuming the pack were to lose it's final two games?
Home field is overrated anyway.
I guess I agree with that.
I just have BAD memories of our last 4 HOME playoff games. We lost 3 of them: Giants, Vikings, Falcons...... as 7+ point favorites.
Meanwhile we ran the table last year on the road.
COMPROMISE? http://packersinsider.com/2011/12/packers-should-move-lambeau-to-miami/
Home field is overrated anyway, as if us winning 4 post-season games just last year didn't prove, our us losing our last HOME playoff game to the Giants in 2008, who also won 4 playoff games away from their home, to win the Super Bowl.
For a team like the Saints, they've struggled away from their dome though... losing at Seattle somehow.
OK, go back 30 years and tell me how many times the #1 seeds make the Super Bowl. I bet it's no more than half the time.don't be so short sighted, the numbers over many many many years of playoffs greatly FAVOR the HOME team
Well playing a month at home with a bye week in there sure as hell can't hurt.OK, go back 30 years and tell me how many times the #1 seeds make the Super Bowl. I bet it's no more than half the time.
OK, go back 30 years and tell me how many times the #1 seeds make the Super Bowl. I bet it's no more than half the time.
No matter what, you would rather be at home. And you would rather force dome teams to come to the cold and stuff like that.OK, go back 30 years and tell me how many times the #1 seeds make the Super Bowl. I bet it's no more than half the time.
In taking a closer look at the seed slots, the No. 2 seed has produced the most Super Bowl champions. When grouped together, the top two seeds -- who would own first-round byes -- have a 66.6 percent change of making it to the Super Bowl and a 27.8 percent chance of taking home the Lombardi Trophy. Keep in mind that there has not been a No. 1 seed vs. No. 1 seed Super Bowl matchup in this nine-year span. A No. 1 seed has faced a No. 2 seed three times, and the No. 2 seed has won the Super Bowl all three times. It happened in 2001, when the New England Patriots defeated the St. Louis Rams in Super Bowl XXXVI. It happened the following year, when the Tampa Bay Buccaneers beat the Oakland Raiders in Super Bowl XXXVII. And, it happened again in 2004, when the Patriots defeated the Philadelphia Eagles in Super Bowl XXXIX.
The chances of winning a Super Bowl from the No. 3, 4, 5 or 6 seeds are the same. The best "wild-card" stories involved the No. 6-seeded 2005 Pittsburgh Steelers defeating the No. 1-seeded Seattle Seahawks in Super Bowl XL. The No. 5-seeded New York Giants defeated the No. 1-seeded -- and previously unbeaten -- Patriots in Super Bowl XLII. The only No. 1 seed to hoist the Lombardi Trophy were the 2003 Patriots, who defeated the No. 3-seeded Carolina Panthers in Super Bowl XXXVIII.
The 14-0 Colts have already clinched the AFC's top seed this year. The Saints can clinch the NFC's No. 1 seed with a win on Sunday at home against the 2-12 Buccaneers. There will be a lot of talk about how great a Colts-Saints Super Bowl matchup would be if the two could meet in South Florida in early February. However, keep in mind the trends of the past nine years. The No. 1 seeds have just a five percent chance of winning the Super Bowl. Two No. 1 seeds have yet to meet in the Super Bowl this decade, and haven't done so since the 1993 season when the Dallas Cowboys and Buffalo Bills met in Super Bowl XXVIII.
The Colts and Saints have looked like great teams all season, but the biggest mountain has yet to be climbed. It would be wise to pay closer attention to the teams that finish in the No. 2 seed, which at this point appears to be the San Diego Chargers and Minnesota Vikings.