Fire Bisaccia?

Should He Stay Or Should He Go Now?

  • He Should Have Been Fired Monday

    Votes: 6 54.5%
  • Give Him a Few More Games

    Votes: 2 18.2%
  • Wait Until After The Season Is Over to Evaluate

    Votes: 3 27.3%
  • Absolutely Not, Bisaccia Is the 2nd Coming of Lombardi

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    11

El Guapo

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
7,100
Reaction score
2,471
Location
Land 'O Lakes
Removing him as ST coach means you promote his long time assistant, Byron Storer or find someone else within or outside. Not a lot of good options in season. Strang thing about Storer. He has been a Special Teams assistant coach since 2010! He has been with Bisaccia since 2018. I find it odd that the assistant under a supposed great ST coach, hasn't advance past "assistant".
Some people understand their strengths and weaknesses really well, so this may not be odd at all. I too am one of those people that has been a leader in many different organizations, but if I have my choice, I'll be the guy behind the scenes making everything work for the head honcho. Not everyone wants to be Batman - they're content to be Robin.
 
OP
OP
Pokerbrat2000

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
35,895
Reaction score
10,486
Location
Madison, WI
For some reason the sensors here block part of the name of the city I live in here in FL. P U N T A Gorda. I have to use my county for my location. lol

I haven't heard Puntang used in a long time! One of my college buddies used to use it excessively, the word that is. ;)
 

El Guapo

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
7,100
Reaction score
2,471
Location
Land 'O Lakes
Anyway, I would like to blame some of the issues with youth, but lets not forget that these guys have been playing football for years, this isn't their first experience. I also don't like some of the decisions that Bisaccia seems to give his units.
Actually, that's not accurate. Most of these guys were the studs on their high school and college teams. They weren't playing special teams. Now they made it to the NFL and are told that they aren't good enough to start. That is a HUGE mental blow to any 20yr old.

If they can mentally get past the "demotion," they then need to learn their parts on special teams.
 
OP
OP
Pokerbrat2000

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
35,895
Reaction score
10,486
Location
Madison, WI
Some people understand their strengths and weaknesses really well, so this may not be odd at all. I too am one of those people that has been a leader in many different organizations, but if I have my choice, I'll be the guy behind the scenes making everything work for the head honcho. Not everyone wants to be Batman - they're content to be Robin.

Good point and Storer might be comfortable to spend the rest of his professional coaching career as an assistant Special Teams guy. I guess it just doesn't seem like the normal path of NFL and NCAA coaches for a now 41 year old to spend 15 years in the NFL as "just an assistant". If that is the case and he is content, so be it. Not sure I would be content to be under Bisaccia at the moment....and when I say "under", I do mean in the hierarchy way. ;)
 
OP
OP
Pokerbrat2000

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
35,895
Reaction score
10,486
Location
Madison, WI
Actually, that's not accurate. Most of these guys were the studs on their high school and college teams. They weren't playing special teams. Now they made it to the NFL and are told that they aren't good enough to start. That is a HUGE mental blow to any 20yr old.

If they can mentally get past the "demotion," they then need to learn their parts on special teams.
I might debate that if I had the desire to dig deep and follow the career paths of H.S. and college players, but I don't. I do know this, when you are a freshman and even a sophomore, you usually cut your teeth on special teams.

Even still, as you said, most of the NFL players were elite studs in the levels below the NFL. Given that point, I would expect that most of them have the ability to learn how to block without holding, make proper decisions on fielding punts and kicks etc. Such things are what your coaches teach you, to date, we lack those skills under Bisaccia. If you don't believe that, ask the coaches of other special teams in the NFL, that aren't having the same issues.
 

El Guapo

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
7,100
Reaction score
2,471
Location
Land 'O Lakes
I might debate that if I had the desire to dig deep and follow the career paths of H.S. and college players, but I don't. I do know this, when you are a freshman and even a sophomore, you usually cut your teeth on special teams.

Even still, as you said, most of the NFL players were elite studs in the levels below the NFL. Given that point, I would expect that most of them have the ability to learn how to block without holding, make proper decisions on fielding punts and kicks etc. Such things are what your coaches teach you, to date, we lack those skills under Bisaccia. If you don't believe that, ask the coaches of other special teams in the NFL, that aren't having the same issues.
You're right. These things shouldn't be happening and IMO a good coach would be able to take advantage of the July-Sept camp to do all of the teaching, and utilize the first few games of the season to correct mistakes and fine tune. There is still time for this to happen, so we will see how Bisaccia handles several bad weeks of play under his command.
 

Magooch

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 15, 2021
Messages
1,524
Reaction score
1,523
Here's an interesting piece on the topic.

The short of it is... our draft and develop philosophy means that we just don't really care that much to dedicate many resources (in particular veterans/experienced players) to special teams roles...so as has been mentioned, it's hard to say just how much firing Bisaccia will accomplish until that changes... in some ways it is asking to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear...
 
OP
OP
Pokerbrat2000

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
35,895
Reaction score
10,486
Location
Madison, WI
Here's an interesting piece on the topic.

The short of it is... our draft and develop philosophy means that we just don't really care that much to dedicate many resources (in particular veterans/experienced players) to special teams roles...so as has been mentioned, it's hard to say just how much firing Bisaccia will accomplish until that changes... in some ways it is asking to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear...

Not sure I agree or disagree with the author of this article. He is only speculating and doesn't really offer up numbers that prove his theories of "This problem is deeper than a coordinator. It’s about how this franchise structures its entire roster"

While I don't have the numbers either, but I would wager to guess that over the 2 decades which the Packers Special Teams have been at the bottom, they weren't always on the younger side roster wise. Yes, TT was Draft and Develop, but he had some older guys, that also played special teams. Seems like this is just an easy excuse with the current roster "They are the youngest team in the league, so they are gonna suck."

The author kind of double downs on his lack of evidence by throwing out "Beyond just roster construction issues, the 2011 collective bargaining agreement limited practice time even more strictly, which made getting young players ready for the kicking game even more difficult." Well yes, but every team is facing this restriction, not just the Packers.

Show me actual numbers of just how young every teams core of special teams players were over the last 2 decades, then we can have a more knowledgeable conversation. One thing is clear, at least he points it out with some numbers, over the last 2 decades the Packers special teams have been far from special.

Finally, making your Special Teams coordinator a part time guy, by making him an assistant HC isn't the answer to fixing things. If the Packers think that because their special teams guy are so young they are always going to suck, then they should hire more coaches, to teach them how to play special teams better.
 

milani

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
6,490
Reaction score
2,985
Some people understand their strengths and weaknesses really well, so this may not be odd at all. I too am one of those people that has been a leader in many different organizations, but if I have my choice, I'll be the guy behind the scenes making everything work for the head honcho. Not everyone wants to be Batman - they're content to be Robin.
I think they make the change at the end of the season unless the blunders continue to cost us games. The question is do the players believe in Bisaccia or do they blame themselves?
 

gopkrs

Cheesehead
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
6,924
Reaction score
2,123
I am not as worried as some of placing the BEST returner back there. Whether he is a starter or not. It can be a huge game changer to have a long return or a fumble. So put your guy with the best hands, eyes and navigating the field skills back there, especially on punts.

A Special Teams coach needs to be confident in his returners. Now there are situations where they need to be told "Just Fair Catch no matter what." Otherwise, let them make the decision of fielding it or not. Golden right now lets punts hit the ground first too often.
He also needs to explain to his returners the rules. And what they should do if the ball is obviously going to hit very near the goal line. Which is to catch it and return it.
 

El Guapo

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
7,100
Reaction score
2,471
Location
Land 'O Lakes
I hope Bisaccia never installs a PUNT A option, we may never be able to talk about it!
Would the problem be if he has a PUNT AN Gang?

He also needs to explain to his returners the rules. And what they should do if the ball is obviously going to hit very near the goal line. Which is to catch it and return it.
It's possible that he has repeatedly. Imagine that these players are your 14-17yr old kids, that tune you out and never focus on what you want them to focus on. Part of that is just the age and maturity of the kids, but a different person may be able to get the message across better.
 

gopkrs

Cheesehead
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
6,924
Reaction score
2,123
Would the problem be if he has a PUNT AN Gang?


It's possible that he has repeatedly. Imagine that these players are your 14-17yr old kids, that tune you out and never focus on what you want them to focus on. Part of that is just the age and maturity of the kids, but a different person may be able to get the message across better.
It's his job to get the messages across. And Savion did it twice in one game. And with the problems all around in the STs game; his message doesn't seem to be getting through to very many players. When is it his fault? Maybe he doesn't get his plan across to his coaches. Either way, other teams don't have all the problems we have.
 
OP
OP
Pokerbrat2000

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
35,895
Reaction score
10,486
Location
Madison, WI
Either way, other teams don't have all the problems we have.

This is the important part of the situation and it seems some Bisaccia Apologists won't acknowledge it. Bisaccia's special teams have ranked at or around the bottom of 32 teams. That means that a lot of teams are doing it better. While I don't watch a lot of other teams games, I watch some and I watch Packer opponents. It isn't like other teams are putting all there veteran starters out there on special teams. They too are using their backups and young guys for special teams.

The only "excuse" I will accept with Bisaccia is that maybe being an assistant HC doesn't give him enough time to devote to special teams. IF that is the case, than I put this issue on MLF for his coaching structure. Bisaccia doesn't seem to be helping speed things up on offense during games. Plays are still getting in way too slow, there is still questionable clock management and play calling.

So please, lets stop making excuses for Bisaccia and MLF. Poor Special teams play has cost the Packers at least 1 (Cleveland) if not 2 (tie with Dallas) games already this season. That is out of only 4 games! Almost more importantly, we talk about all of the Special Teams mistakes, I can't really think of any special teams highlights, which also can actually win a team a few games (See Cleveland).
 
Last edited:

Thirteen Below

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Messages
1,965
Reaction score
1,807
With regards to his role as assistant head coach... It really makes me curious as to what sort of division of labor we've got going on at the top of the coaching tree. What exactly is Bisaccia doing as assistant HC (or alternatively: What exactly is MLF handing off to him)
That's the whole problem - nobody seems to know what he even does. Makes it hard to put together an informed opinion on whether to fire him. We're basically shooting in the dark, and one thing I love about this group is that are very few people in the habit of offering half-assed opinions.


Bisaccia also seems to be really well-liked amongst the guys in the locker room, so he seems to be doing something right, but idk.
To his credit it did seem like his guys with the Raiders loved him too...
As I recall, Eberflus was quite popular with his players, too.... ;)


Others like guys simply getting blown up on FG protection or something...I don't know how much coaching/scheme can fix guys who are just getting physically manhandled

Perhaps this is big consequence of having one of the youngest teams in the league here - you have a lot of guys with potential for sure, but at the same time a lot of other teams' top ST contributors are experienced/established vets who are "high floor, low ceiling" type guys.
And I think this is highly likely to be the biggest factor, right there. And we're not the only ones who are starting to feel that way, either - I've seen more and more writers suggesting that very thing the last couple of weeks (and especially this past week), as well as some podcasters.

I'm linking one of the podcasts, which I think makes the argument rather well. I have mixed feelings about Peter Bukowski, partly because he's so intense and caustic, and has a tendency to beat a dead horse into a bloody pulp. But he does make some good points sometimes.

And he tends to beat his points to death to get them across, which tends to distract from the fact that some of his points are pretty astute. The gist of the argument is that (apparently) Green Bay is one of the very few teams in the NFL that packs the special teams unit almost exclusively with young players, as a part of the "draft and develop" model - setting aside the ST roster spots for young players in order to give them a couple of extra years to show what they've got. But (according to this theory) that absolute commitment to D&D and putting younger players out there in crucial situations is hurting us on special teams.

Accurate data on the age profile of every club's special teams unit is hard to find, but it does seem that most other organizations make it a point to assemble a core of veterans on ST to play key roles and establish a stable foundation for the unit. They use rotational players or even starters in crucial areas (especially the blocking and kick-rushing units), rather than rookie or sophomore linemen who are third-string at their normal position. From what I've been able to find, Brandon McManus and Matt Orzech are the only players over 29, and the only other veteran teams players are LBs Eric Williams and Kristian Welch, with an occasional snap for Corey Ballantine.

This seems to be very unusual compared to elite clubs who have top-ranked special teams units. Richard Sherman was a core special teams player for years even when he was an all-pro, Cooper Dejean is a regular punt returner, Penei Sewell is a ST regular - and 2-time 1st team All-Pro and 3-time pro-bowler.

Other upper-level teams are using their roster to put their best players in key roles in order to give their team the best chance to win, and we clutch our pearls and worry about Keisan Nixon or Bo Melton risking an injury.



You must be logged in to see this image or video!
 
OP
OP
Pokerbrat2000

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
35,895
Reaction score
10,486
Location
Madison, WI
That's the whole problem - nobody seems to know what he even does. Makes it hard to put together an informed opinion on whether to fire him. We're basically shooting in the dark, and one thing I love about this group is that are very few people in the habit of offering half-assed opinions.

Sometimes, without all the facts, you have to do things by deduction. So I ask myslef, has the offense and the team performed better since Bisaccia became the Assistant HC? Also, has the Special Teams gotten better or worse since this move?
 
OP
OP
Pokerbrat2000

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
35,895
Reaction score
10,486
Location
Madison, WI
Other upper-level teams are using their roster to put their best players in key roles in order to give their team the best chance to win, and we clutch our pearls and worry about Keisan Nixon or Bo Melton risking an injury.

I guess I am in disagreement with this and Peter's guest, Justis Mosqueda.

BTW, isn't Mathew Golden one of our best WR's? Yet, he looks totally indecisive back there as the punt returner.

One of the big reasons that non-starters are used for Special Teams is practice time. With the new CBA practice time is limited enough, so trying to get special teams units organized to practice, with a lot of starters included, just isn't that smart. Are the special teams guys as good as the starters? No, not at the starters position, that is why they are backups at their position. However, all of these guys, rookies or not, are star players from College Football. They had the skills and talent to make it to the NFL, so now it is time for the coaches to coach them on playing positions they may not be familiar with, whether that is on offense, defense or special teams.

Personally, I think this whole "we need better players on special teams" is an excuse for poor coaching. Because if they did need better players, they may have them (starters), but coaches decided not to use them and that is either due to lack of practice reps or fear of injury.

Are the teams that we are playing against, using starters on their kickoff teams and FG defensive units? I think not, yet our return teams still make too many mistakes and our FG unit isn't blocking well.

Final note. Special teams is usually made up of the lower tier of your roster. Players that suddenly become starters due to injuries. Then you have Practice squad guys get called up and they become Special teams players. The J.O.B. of the Special Teams coordinator is to take the resources he is given and make them play at a high level. Bottom line for me, Bisaccia isn't doing that.
 

gopkrs

Cheesehead
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
6,924
Reaction score
2,123
Sometimes, without all the facts, you have to do things by deduction. So I ask myslef, has the offense and the team performed better since Bisaccia became the Assistant HC? Also, has the Special Teams gotten better or worse since this move?
Absolutely
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
18,968
Reaction score
9,255
I guess I am in disagreement with this and Peter's guest, Justis Mosqueda.

BTW, isn't Mathew Golden one of our best WR's? Yet, he looks totally indecisive back there as the punt returner.

One of the big reasons that non-starters are used for Special Teams is practice time. With the new CBA practice time is limited enough, so trying to get special teams units organized to practice, with a lot of starters included, just isn't that smart. Are the special teams guys as good as the starters? No, not at the starters position, that is why they are backups at their position. However, all of these guys, rookies or not, are star players from College Football. They had the skills and talent to make it to the NFL, so now it is time for the coaches to coach them on playing positions they may not be familiar with, whether that is on offense, defense or special teams.

Personally, I think this whole "we need better players on special teams" is an excuse for poor coaching. Because if they did need better players, they may have them (starters), but coaches decided not to use them and that is either due to lack of practice reps or fear of injury.

Are the teams that we are playing against, using starters on their kickoff teams and FG defensive units? I think not, yet our return teams still make too many mistakes and our FG unit isn't blocking well.

Final note. Special teams is usually made up of the lower tier of your roster. Players that suddenly become starters due to injuries. Then you have Practice squad guys get called up and they become Special teams players. The J.O.B. of the Special Teams coordinator is to take the resources he is given and make them play at a high level. Bottom line for me, Bisaccia isn't doing that.
I think it’s time to move on but not necessarily this minute. Bisaccia and Co have the experience level to make marked changes in minimal time. It’s back to who is going to come in and flip the Teams unit overnight? Be careful for what you wish for.

Personally I think it’s a lack of ongoing training. There’s no other explanation I can think of for Savion Williams allowing 3 consecutive Kickoffs to start at the 20. Anyone on Earth can do that. Heck they can hire me for that! What training do I need to back up and let kicks roll past me.
 
OP
OP
Pokerbrat2000

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
35,895
Reaction score
10,486
Location
Madison, WI
I think it’s time to move on but not necessarily this minute. Bisaccia and Co have the experience level to make marked changes in minimal time. It’s back to who is going to come in and flip the Teams unit overnight? Be careful for what you wish for.

Personally I think it’s a lack of ongoing training. There’s no other explanation I can think of for Savion Williams allowing 3 consecutive Kickoffs to start at the 20. Anyone on Earth can do that. Heck they can hire me for that! What training do I need to back up and let kicks roll past me.

No doubt, this is about the worst time to try and "move on" from a coach. Quality College and NFL coaches are all currently employed. However, MLF does have an option, he can remove one of Bisaccia's hats and make him focus full time on coaching one thing. At this point, I would say that he should be only coaching Special Teams. That way, come Jan./ Feb., The Packers can see what Bisaccia did as a fulltime Special teams coach and make a decision from there.
 

milani

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
6,490
Reaction score
2,985
That's the whole problem - nobody seems to know what he even does. Makes it hard to put together an informed opinion on whether to fire him. We're basically shooting in the dark, and one thing I love about this group is that are very few people in the habit of offering half-assed opinions.




As I recall, Eberflus was quite popular with his players, too.... ;)





And I think this is highly likely to be the biggest factor, right there. And we're not the only ones who are starting to feel that way, either - I've seen more and more writers suggesting that very thing the last couple of weeks (and especially this past week), as well as some podcasters.

I'm linking one of the podcasts, which I think makes the argument rather well. I have mixed feelings about Peter Bukowski, partly because he's so intense and caustic, and has a tendency to beat a dead horse into a bloody pulp. But he does make some good points sometimes.

And he tends to beat his points to death to get them across, which tends to distract from the fact that some of his points are pretty astute. The gist of the argument is that (apparently) Green Bay is one of the very few teams in the NFL that packs the special teams unit almost exclusively with young players, as a part of the "draft and develop" model - setting aside the ST roster spots for young players in order to give them a couple of extra years to show what they've got. But (according to this theory) that absolute commitment to D&D and putting younger players out there in crucial situations is hurting us on special teams.

Accurate data on the age profile of every club's special teams unit is hard to find, but it does seem that most other organizations make it a point to assemble a core of veterans on ST to play key roles and establish a stable foundation for the unit. They use rotational players or even starters in crucial areas (especially the blocking and kick-rushing units), rather than rookie or sophomore linemen who are third-string at their normal position. From what I've been able to find, Brandon McManus and Matt Orzech are the only players over 29, and the only other veteran teams players are LBs Eric Williams and Kristian Welch, with an occasional snap for Corey Ballantine.

This seems to be very unusual compared to elite clubs who have top-ranked special teams units. Richard Sherman was a core special teams player for years even when he was an all-pro, Cooper Dejean is a regular punt returner, Penei Sewell is a ST regular - and 2-time 1st team All-Pro and 3-time pro-bowler.

Other upper-level teams are using their roster to put their best players in key roles in order to give their team the best chance to win, and we clutch our pearls and worry about Keisan Nixon or Bo Melton risking an
No doubt, this is about the worst time to try and "move on" from a coach. Quality College and NFL coaches are all currently employed. However, MLF does have an option, he can remove one of Bisaccia's hats and make him focus full time on coaching one thing. At this point, I would say that he should be only coaching Special Teams. That way, come Jan./ Feb., The Packers can see what Bisaccia did as a fulltime Special teams coach and make a decision from there

You must be logged in to see this image or video!

That's the whole problem - nobody seems to know what he even does. Makes it hard to put together an informed opinion on whether to fire him. We're basically shooting in the dark, and one thing I love about this group is that are very few people in the habit of offering half-assed opinions.




As I recall, Eberflus was quite popular with his players, too.... ;)





And I think this is highly likely to be the biggest factor, right there. And we're not the only ones who are starting to feel that way, either - I've seen more and more writers suggesting that very thing the last couple of weeks (and especially this past week), as well as some podcasters.

I'm linking one of the podcasts, which I think makes the argument rather well. I have mixed feelings about Peter Bukowski, partly because he's so intense and caustic, and has a tendency to beat a dead horse into a bloody pulp. But he does make some good points sometimes.

And he tends to beat his points to death to get them across, which tends to distract from the fact that some of his points are pretty astute. The gist of the argument is that (apparently) Green Bay is one of the very few teams in the NFL that packs the special teams unit almost exclusively with young players, as a part of the "draft and develop" model - setting aside the ST roster spots for young players in order to give them a couple of extra years to show what they've got. But (according to this theory) that absolute commitment to D&D and putting younger players out there in crucial situations is hurting us on special teams.

Accurate data on the age profile of every club's special teams unit is hard to find, but it does seem that most other organizations make it a point to assemble a core of veterans on ST to play key roles and establish a stable foundation for the unit. They use rotational players or even starters in crucial areas (especially the blocking and kick-rushing units), rather than rookie or sophomore linemen who are third-string at their normal position. From what I've been able to find, Brandon McManus and Matt Orzech are the only players over 29, and the only other veteran teams players are LBs Eric Williams and Kristian Welch, with an occasional snap for Corey Ballantine.

This seems to be very unusual compared to elite clubs who have top-ranked special teams units. Richard Sherman was a core special teams player for years even when he was an all-pro, Cooper Dejean is a regular punt returner, Penei Sewell is a ST regular - and 2-time 1st team All-Pro and 3-time pro-bowler.

Other upper-level teams are using their roster to put their best players in key roles in order to give their team the best chance to win, and we clutch our pearls and worry about Keisan Nixon or Bo Melton risking an injury.



You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Bisaccia reminds me of a barking dog who sits out on your front porch. You cannot tell if he wants to come inside or go down the road for a run.
 

Zartan

Cans.wav
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
2,835
Reaction score
1,250
With all the ST coordinators they came through and have sucked there's gotta be a common denominator somewhere.
 

Thirteen Below

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Messages
1,965
Reaction score
1,807
I too am one of those people that has been a leader in many different organizations, but if I have my choice, I'll be the guy behind the scenes making everything work for the head honcho. Not everyone wants to be Batman - they're content to be Robin.
I completely relate to that! I was the same way... I never liked being in the limelight; I always wanted to be the drummer, not the guitar hero or lead singer.

It often didn't work out that way, because in almost every job (over 5 separate careers) I'd quickly get promoted into supervisory or manager positions, ultimately retiring as the operations manager of a department of ~110 employees. That's the one from which I took early retirement at the start of covid.

But I learned to get past the internal conflicts by viewing my department as a team, and making my management style more that of a coach than a hardassed "boss". I borrowed liberally from Big Chief Buddha, Phil Jackson. I made it my role to constantly look for ways to help my people do the best job they could. Got excellent results, still felt like I was working low-profile and behind the scenes.

The thing about football coaches, though, is that they often tend to be aggressive, competitive guys - I'm not sure how many of them would be content to play second fiddle if they had a chance to move up a rung.
 

Magooch

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 15, 2021
Messages
1,524
Reaction score
1,523
I guess I am in disagreement with this and Peter's guest, Justis Mosqueda.

BTW, isn't Mathew Golden one of our best WR's? Yet, he looks totally indecisive back there as the punt returner.

One of the big reasons that non-starters are used for Special Teams is practice time. With the new CBA practice time is limited enough, so trying to get special teams units organized to practice, with a lot of starters included, just isn't that smart. Are the special teams guys as good as the starters? No, not at the starters position, that is why they are backups at their position. However, all of these guys, rookies or not, are star players from College Football. They had the skills and talent to make it to the NFL, so now it is time for the coaches to coach them on playing positions they may not be familiar with, whether that is on offense, defense or special teams.

Personally, I think this whole "we need better players on special teams" is an excuse for poor coaching. Because if they did need better players, they may have them (starters), but coaches decided not to use them and that is either due to lack of practice reps or fear of injury.

Are the teams that we are playing against, using starters on their kickoff teams and FG defensive units? I think not, yet our return teams still make too many mistakes and our FG unit isn't blocking well.

Final note. Special teams is usually made up of the lower tier of your roster. Players that suddenly become starters due to injuries. Then you have Practice squad guys get called up and they become Special teams players. The J.O.B. of the Special Teams coordinator is to take the resources he is given and make them play at a high level. Bottom line for me, Bisaccia isn't doing that.
I don't know that it has to be so black-and-white, this-or-that though, does it?

We can say "Bisaccia hasn't done good enough with the resources at his disposal"
And we can also say "The way we structure our roster/allocate resources to special teams makes the job of the ST coach more difficult"

Both can be true at the same time...

Like I said before I think Bisaccia in a vacuum has done enough to merit getting fired, but I'd also ask what we believe to be a reasonable expectation for our ST units to be at this point? If Zook, Menenga, Drayton, and now Bisaccia couldn't fix things...what should our expectation be of the next guy?
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top