Robin Yount
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2005
- Messages
- 265
- Reaction score
- 0
I am some what confused with the situation.
Favre recently stated that he could play longer than this next season.
If he plays "five more years" as the fans over the weekend were chanting, where does that put us with Rodgers? Favre could do it, but than Rodgers is an expensive back up?
If Favre plays for 1 or 2 more years that would be a perfect time table for Rodgers' growth. But Favre would only be 36/37. He could realistically play until 38/39. That would be 3 to 4 years into the Rodgers contract. There is also no guarantee Rodgers will work out.
Are we heading for a QB train wreck or will the Packers organization and Favre work something out. It sure seems as if Favre and the Pack were not clear on a time table at the time of the draft.
Maybe I am thinking too much.
Favre recently stated that he could play longer than this next season.
If he plays "five more years" as the fans over the weekend were chanting, where does that put us with Rodgers? Favre could do it, but than Rodgers is an expensive back up?
If Favre plays for 1 or 2 more years that would be a perfect time table for Rodgers' growth. But Favre would only be 36/37. He could realistically play until 38/39. That would be 3 to 4 years into the Rodgers contract. There is also no guarantee Rodgers will work out.
Are we heading for a QB train wreck or will the Packers organization and Favre work something out. It sure seems as if Favre and the Pack were not clear on a time table at the time of the draft.
Maybe I am thinking too much.