http://www.packers.com/news-and-eve...f9-48ec-8d6f-9afe2e19b6c8?campaign=sf16446401
just FYI. didn't see this coming at this point of the season
just FYI. didn't see this coming at this point of the season
I'd believe it's more likley he heard rumblings of changes coming, especially since MM said it after the last game, so he wrote an article about it, rather than TT and MM responded to an article McGinn wroteSame day that McGinn releases a scathing article calling out, you guessed it, McCarthy & Thompson for not tinkering with the roster enough in season. Blaming them for becoming too complacent. Interesting
Swapping out one guy who won't dress for another guy who won't dress. TT is living on the edge today!!!Same day that McGinn releases a scathing article calling out, you guessed it, McCarthy & Thompson for not tinkering with the roster enough in season. Blaming them for becoming too complacent. Interesting
I'm glad Jake is getting a look.Per Ian Rapport on Twitter, Packers are giving Jake Ryan an expanded role at ILB.
http://gnb.247sports.com/Bolt/Packers-look-to-expand-Jake-Ryans-role-three-weeks-too-late-41687349
5 carries, 22 yardsSwapping out one guy who won't dress for another guy who won't dress. TT is living on the edge today!!!
He looked pretty good. I like what I saw. Why did Lacy sit so much?
You nailed that oneSwapping out one guy who won't dress for another guy who won't dress. TT is living on the edge today!!!
As the author notes, what took so long? It would be one thing if they were getting good play out of the ILB not named Clay Matthews but they weren't. When there's a more physically talented rookie on the roster at a spot where the vet isn't getting it done, play the rookie! What's the difference if the rookie is out of position vs. the vet not being able to make a play? The difference is the rookie is likely to get better with experience.Per Ian Rapport on Twitter, Packers are giving Jake Ryan an expanded role at ILB.
Was the disaster on the TD to the Det. TE his bad? Just asking, wish him the best.
IIRC, Crockett was the most well-rounded of the RBs not name Lacy or Starks in preseason. I too was surprised they kept Harris instead of Crokett. He looked good in limited snaps last night, but I though Harris did too when he got the ball previously.I always liked Crockett and was really surprised when they cut him. And he looked good. But to be fair to Lacy; Crockett actually had a couple of holes to run through. Lacy had nothing but stacked lines.
Was the disaster on the TD to the Det. TE his bad? Just asking, wish him the best.