1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

Bulaga reportedly sign with the Packers

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by HardRightEdge, Mar 4, 2015.

  1. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,813
    Ratings:
    +3,750
    With the internets all abuzz over the Cobb situation, little is being said about Bulaga. What happens if his agent comes in with a high ball number in consideration of the thin FA class?
     
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2015
  2. sjb12681

    sjb12681 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2013
    Messages:
    212
    Ratings:
    +151
    I think this is a real possibility. I think TT has a number in mind, and like Cobb, if it isnt in line with what he is willing to go to, he will let him walk and next man up
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Ogsponge

    Ogsponge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2013
    Messages:
    701
    Ratings:
    +602
    I think if we lose both Bulaga and Cobb, things are not going to be as rosy as people might think come next year. However, I have been wrong once or twice before. I personally believe mixing up the continuity of the offensive line that was great last year would hurt us more than losing Cobb though.
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
  4. sjb12681

    sjb12681 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2013
    Messages:
    212
    Ratings:
    +151
    Cobb, while good, is replaceable. I would hate to see the same thing that has occurred with our OL in the past happen again. Every year we seem to find the sweet spot for continuity, we lose our best lineman and we wind up playing shuffle the deck for 2-3 more years again.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Pokerbrat2000

    Pokerbrat2000 Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Messages:
    4,743
    Ratings:
    +2,949
    Kind of like Cobb......I am a Bulaga fan, but as with Cobb and most players, do not break the bank on him or mortgage the future. Which I am confident TT will not do.

    He is replaceable. Look what we did with a Rookie Center last year.

    He doesn't have a great track record with injuries either.....and when he was out, we made do.

    2011: Played 12 games (second team all pro)
    2012: " 9 games
    2013: Didn't play
    2014: Played 15 games
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  6. yooperpackfan

    yooperpackfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,149
    Ratings:
    +568
    Then it's probably bye bye Bulaga.
     
  7. Sanguine camper

    Sanguine camper Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2014
    Messages:
    387
    Ratings:
    +200
    Packers should not overpay for any of their free agents. They can always plug in a rookie or free agent if they have to. If Bulaga wants the the highest RT money in the NFL they should show him the door
     
  8. 7thFloorRA

    7thFloorRA Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2011
    Messages:
    2,266
    Ratings:
    +1,075
    Cobb is responsible for Cobb on the field. Bulaga keeps #12 in one piece. He is pretty important. Remember how awful the line was on the right side when he was hurt? Barclay is a good backup but not really a good starter.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  9. Mondio

    Mondio Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2014
    Messages:
    2,835
    Ratings:
    +1,799
    I'm not really digging any of our backups going out to RT. Fine in a pinch, get us thru a game or two, but I'm not really comfortable with them getting the starting job. Or maybe they'll get better with more time?? I guess that would be the hope, but I'd rather Bulaga stay out there and take care of that spot on his own rather than someone else with "help"
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  10. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,813
    Ratings:
    +3,750
    Without Bulaga, a step down to "adequate" is taken with Barclay and that's assuming no residual affects from the ACL. It's a double whammy since there will be no OL bench strength, in particular no backup who could even sniff at LT.

    In the event of a Bulaga/Cobb departure, Thompson will have a heaping pile of cap to work with. And if a vet ILB is the first move, a vet OT who can at least back up can't be far behind, and that guy's either going to be expensive or not starter material.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Carl

    Carl Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2013
    Messages:
    2,771
    Ratings:
    +1,922
    Barclay was a solid starter to me when Buluga was out two years ago.
     
  12. adambr2

    adambr2 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2012
    Messages:
    2,792
    Ratings:
    +2,175
    I don't know about solid starter, I remember him more as passable, better than Marshall Newhouse type. You could get by with him but you'll have to give him help.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,813
    Ratings:
    +3,750
    Without Bulaga, the backup LT is Derek Sherrod. Maybe he rises from the ashes but I'd not bet on it.
     
  14. Sanguine camper

    Sanguine camper Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2014
    Messages:
    387
    Ratings:
    +200
    If Barkley is a restricted free agent then he may leave as well since TT usually lowballs restricted FA's. Bottom line is if the Packets are going to remain the youngest team in the league then they had better let guys walk and replace them with rookies or free agents. They have been doing that at the center position and RT is likely a similar situation. TT's teams are the youngest or close to the youngest team in the league nearly every season. That is a big priority for him. He had no problem letting veterans walk even if they are elite or above average players.
     
  15. adambr2

    adambr2 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2012
    Messages:
    2,792
    Ratings:
    +2,175
    I don't even think Sherrod is here anymore. Didn't he sign a futures contract with the Chiefs?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. yooperpackfan

    yooperpackfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,149
    Ratings:
    +568
    Didn't he end the season with KC?
     
  17. Dan115

    Dan115 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Sherrod ---is NOT a Packer
     
  18. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,813
    Ratings:
    +3,750
    My bad. I thought the Packers brought him back on a futures contract. It was KC.
     
  19. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,813
    Ratings:
    +3,750
    If the Packers did not resign any of the veterans of interest, and stays among the youngest teams in the league by not signing any free agents to replace them, Thompson will be sitting a a big heap of unused salary cap. I don't see that happening.

    Thompson will never let both Bulaga and Barklay go...the O-Line cupboard will be bare.

    On the bright side...the Packers play in a chronically weak division which shows little sign of improving.
     
  20. ExpatPacker

    ExpatPacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,483
    Ratings:
    +630
    If Bulaga is not re-signed the Packers pretty much have to draft one in the first few rounds if not the first round. Not to do so is to risk the franchise.
     
  21. TJV

    TJV Lifelong Packers Fanatic

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    5,389
    Ratings:
    +4,176
    I don't think having the youngest team - or nearly the youngest team in the league is a "big priority" for Thompson. In fact, letting core and elite players walk for the purpose of having a young team (if that were the big priority) seems incredibly foolish. Thompson's big priority is being a draft and develop team which keeps as many of the core and elite players it develops as it can. Letting a soon to be 26 year old Bulaga (and a 24 year old Cobb) go to "stay young" would be idiotic IMO.
     
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2015
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  22. ivo610

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    16,590
    Ratings:
    +4,274
    How many elite players has he let walk and they remain elite?
    Brett Favre doesnt count
     
  23. PackerDNA

    PackerDNA Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,189
    Ratings:
    +942
    Kind of ironic that Sherrod will be trying out with KC, since it was the game vs KC in 2011 that he suffered that horrific injury.
     
  24. Mondio

    Mondio Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2014
    Messages:
    2,835
    Ratings:
    +1,799
    He is not letting them go to stay "young". If they go, it will be because somebody else over paid, and you have to learn to accept that if you want to be a fan and maintain some sanity. It's going to happen.
     
  25. Sunshinepacker

    Sunshinepacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,923
    Ratings:
    +737
    Bulaga would be nice but let's remember the Packers went 15-1 with Marshall Newhouse starting 13 games at left tackle. I think everyone can agree that a Newhouse-level player is probably the worst case scenario for whoever replaces Bulaga and that left tackle is way more important than right tackle. Losing Bulaga won't be the end of the world, or even close to it.
     

Share This Page