Whats their record? In the time frame
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
I am just curious what big spending, crappy teams have anything to do with a great team like the Packers, filling a few holes with reasonable free agents?
Oh wait, the answer is absolutely nothing...
I believe the Packers have the highest winning % during that time whilst shelling out the 31st most guaranteed money.
I believe the Packers have the highest winning % during that time whilst shelling out the 31st most guaranteed money.
I am just curious what big spending, crappy teams have anything to do with a great team like the Packers, filling a few holes with reasonable free agents?
Oh wait, the answer is absolutely nothing...
The Packers (.653) are second in the league in winning percentage over the last 10 years behind the Patriots (.775).
Right, and I am with you on that point all the way. I think most fans, even us who are vocal about our displeasure in lack of use of free agency, understand that yet a lot of people seem to think we dontNot saying good reasonable spending shouldn't be done at all.. Im with you.
It was interesting stat I saw on Twitter... But it does show spending a butt load isn't a guarantee to win...
Right, and I am with you on that point all the way. I think most fans, even us who are vocal about our displeasure in lack of use of free agency, understand that yet a lot of people seem to think we dont
I spend a lot of time around Poker players. There are those that consistently go all in and sure once in a great while, they win a tournament, but for the most part they are sitting and watching the rest of us play. Then there are players like TT, they sit back, let other guys bust out, slowly playing their best hands and building up their chip stacks. Now this kind of player doesn't always win, maybe even a bit boring to watch, but for the most part, they are sitting at the table at the end of the night with a legit shot at winning.
So I guess its for you as a fan to decide for yourself, do you like watching that flashy player who risks it all and occasionally wins it all or is it more entertaining to sit back and watch the slow methodical player who usually hangs in to the end? You may not like the way TT "plays" but don't expect him to change his strategy anytime soon.
No middle ground? Can we watch a player move in aggressively, but not all in? And, (personal choice, obviously) I don't consider that the Pack has been hanging in to the end since 2010 - they've left the table earlier than others.