Gee... I don't know.
Who exactly is blaming a player who is no longer on the team and has not been on the team since week four?
Who started the thread and tried to make a point that the Packers are better off with out Carroll?
Try to keep up.
Well, I was bored, got the highlight video done and uploading so decided to toss some numbers around.
Here are the yards the QB racked up against us...
and Without Ahmad
With Ahmad we gave up 311 passing yards/game.
Without Ahmad we gave up 215 passing yards/game.
Was it Ahmad that made the big difference or was it something else?
I never said he was the reason, I ASKED if it was him that made the big difference or was it something else.
The Packers started the season by losing to the Bears 26-0. Did Carroll some how keep the Packers from scoring in that game? I know that Brett Favre threw 2 INTS and had a QB rating of 40.9 in that one.
Notice QB passing yards was only mentioned in my initial post. Not TD, not Win/Loss and nothing else you decided to throw into this to start an argument. The QB passing yards, thats it! That is all I mentioned. I'm not ignorant enough to think we are winning games SOLEY based on the fact that Carroll is on another team. What do you think I am, a pathetic loser Bear fan? I'd rather eat bleach an die.
They scored a whopping 9 points against the Eagles, which everyone started referring to as the Carroll game. Brett Favre threw 2 INTs and had a QB rating of 44.2 that in game so I guess that someone has to get the blame.
It was because his WR are not tall enough! hah j/k ... Ahmad said he was the reason the Packers lost, it was the first time the kid actually took accountability for his crappy play an big mistakes. Brett threw 3 INT last week and the Packers won, against a inferior team of course.
How about against New Orleans? Drew Brees threw for over 300 yards in that game. Was that Carroll? The guy has only thrown for over 300 in a game 8 times this year and those other seven teams did not have Carroll in the secondary. You think that maybe is was not Carroll after all?
How about the two games after that? 157 and 150 yards?
Why don't you wait until the Packers actually stop giving up 30 points a game on a regular basis before you claim that they are better off with out a guy who has not played for the them for almost 3 months.
I'm not talking about points in a game. Did I post those stats or was it QB passing yards? Try to keep up. Stop adding things to make an argument for yourself.
Carroll is long gone so get over it. You guys said the same crap about Darren Sharper last year even though he went to the pro bowl with the Vikings.
I believe we are over it. I was bored, compiled some QB passing yards and posted a question. I don't see why you have to be childish an make an argument out of it. I never said the same thing about Darren Sharper. I liked the guy and thought he was a good player. Just not good enough to earn what his salary he was projected to make.
Since pinky here doesn't understand basic english I'll try to get everyone back onto the actual purpose of this thread. Sorry for engaging in an argument with whiny Bear fan.
The total yards gained by the QB are posted above (in the main thread post).
The first four games vs the last 10 games the passing yards for the QB have dropped by nearly 100 yards.
Do you think that has anything to do with Ahmad being here those four games and gone the ten? Or is it something else?