1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

All time Dynasty team

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by ivo610, Nov 5, 2014.

  1. ivo610

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    16,590
    Ratings:
    +4,273
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. Packerlifer

    Packerlifer Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,751
    Ratings:
    +514
  3. El Guapo

    El Guapo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,518
    Ratings:
    +1,990
    Curious as the the Kramer/Thurston switch-a-roo but it's probably just a mistake.

    As for Kolb and Russell over Skoronski and Robinson, it was all just to keep the teams balanced.

    No matter how you slice it though, the "dynasty team" that they created here could easily go toe-to-toe with any other HOF team they try to assemble.
     
  4. PackerDNA

    PackerDNA Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +937
    IMO, the only dynasty worthy of serious discussion as best ever along with the Packers are the Steelers of the 70's.
     
  5. JBlood

    JBlood Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    3,154
    Ratings:
    +1,312
  6. JBlood

    JBlood Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    3,154
    Ratings:
    +1,312
    Gotta be a typo, since he knew Kramer threw "the block" and everyone knows it was over R guard, where Kenny Bowman had just as much to do with the block on Pugh.
     
  7. PackerDNA

    PackerDNA Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +937
    I think of dynasties in terms of a team dominating in it's era/decade with the basically same group of core players; not totaling up titles over 90 years.
     
  8. Twiddlemylobes

    Twiddlemylobes Fat Tuesday Orleans

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    1,092
    Ratings:
    +511
    Yeah. To me a dynasty would be consecutive championships or a grouping of dominant years in a close chronological order, with an exception for possibly having a year or two separating the Championships but also relying on the majority of personnel remaining the same and intact
     
  9. Packerlifer

    Packerlifer Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,751
    Ratings:
    +514
    Didn't Bowman once say he knew how Paul Revere's horse felt?
     
  10. JBlood

    JBlood Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    3,154
    Ratings:
    +1,312
    Well, when you're talking greatest of all baseball franchises, it's the Yankees with their 27 World Series titles. In the NFL It's the Packers with their 13 Championships. Nobody else is close. Maybe dynasty is not the term.
    I never read that, but it's a great quote.
     

Share This Page