flapackfan said:
TheEngineer said:
flapackfan said:
I new this would happen. Inconsistent offense, lose turnover battle, lose field position battle, lose time of possession battle. This is Packer Football now so get used to it. The cleansing has begun as they used to say on here.
This is also the preseason, which makes a large percentage of what happened inconsequential and not really indicative of the season performance.
And if the Packers won 34 - 6.......would you say the same thing? Or, would you be saying that the Packers look awesome and are ready to make a playoff push/championship push? It's funny how people say pre season is meaningless only when they lose. If Rodgers went 15/17 for 230 yards and 3 touchdowns would you say "it's just preseason" ? I doubt it.
I would say "Well Rodgers looked pretty good, but there's always something to work on." But thanks for just assuming, in order to prove your hypothesis. You can try and search for some post I made crowing Rodgers as the saviour of the franchise and the Packers going 16-0. But you won't find it. Here's what I wrote in ph.com about the first preseason, if you must know:
"Didn't get to see the game, but it appeared to be an overall decent start. A couple of things here and there to work on.
A couple of questions to those who saw it:
How does Jordy Nelson look as a WR and PR?
Rouse got an interception it seems. Was he impressive during the game? "